Denis J Wakeham, Sauyeh K Zamani, Andrew P Oneglia, Matthew M Howrey, Samer Majeed, Tiffany L Brazile, Joshua A Beckman, James P MacNamara, Mark J Haykowsky, Vlad G Zaha, Benjamin D Levine, Christopher M Hearon, Satyam Sarma, Michael D Nelson
{"title":"Circumferential strain and strain rates of the descending aorta as novel measures of aortic stiffness and wall mechanics from standard cardiac MRI.","authors":"Denis J Wakeham, Sauyeh K Zamani, Andrew P Oneglia, Matthew M Howrey, Samer Majeed, Tiffany L Brazile, Joshua A Beckman, James P MacNamara, Mark J Haykowsky, Vlad G Zaha, Benjamin D Levine, Christopher M Hearon, Satyam Sarma, Michael D Nelson","doi":"10.1113/EP092585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) the horizontal long-axis cine image (i.e., 4-chamber) is captured which includes a cross-section of the descending aorta. The aortic cross-section can be used to assess aortic stiffness (distensibility; ∆area/pressure) or circumferential strain (percentage vascular deformation). We examined whether descending aortic strain from traditional CMR is sensitive to age- and disease-related (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF) arteriosclerosis. We recruited 83 participants into three groups: (1) 34 young individuals (age: 22 ± 3 years; body mass index (BMI): 24.3 ± 2.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); (2) 19 older individuals (age: 69 ± 5 years; BMI: 26.9 ± 4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and (3) 26 patients with HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 years; BMI: 35.8 ± 6.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). All participants were studied in the same 3 T scanner (Phillips, Achieva). Descending aortic cross-sectional area and circumferential strain were measured using cvi<sup>42</sup> software. Blood pressure was measured via a brachial oscillometric cuff. Data were compared via ANOVA. All data are reported as means ± standard deviation. Compared to the young group (71 ± 5 mmHg), mean arterial pressure was higher in the older (83 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) and HFpEF groups (86 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001). Minimum and maximum aortic areas were greater in the older and HFpEF groups (both, P < 0.01). Peak descending aortic strain (young: 11.4% ± 2.2%; older: 4.8% ± 1.6%; HFpEF 3.8% ± 1.6%) and absolute distension were lower (all, P < 0.02) in the older and HFpEF groups compared to the young. Peak descending aortic strain and strain rates are sensitive to age and may provide a novel assessment of arterial stiffness for longitudinal studies that utilize or have utilized CMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) the horizontal long-axis cine image (i.e., 4-chamber) is captured which includes a cross-section of the descending aorta. The aortic cross-section can be used to assess aortic stiffness (distensibility; ∆area/pressure) or circumferential strain (percentage vascular deformation). We examined whether descending aortic strain from traditional CMR is sensitive to age- and disease-related (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF) arteriosclerosis. We recruited 83 participants into three groups: (1) 34 young individuals (age: 22 ± 3 years; body mass index (BMI): 24.3 ± 2.8 kg/m2); (2) 19 older individuals (age: 69 ± 5 years; BMI: 26.9 ± 4.7 kg/m2) and (3) 26 patients with HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 years; BMI: 35.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2). All participants were studied in the same 3 T scanner (Phillips, Achieva). Descending aortic cross-sectional area and circumferential strain were measured using cvi42 software. Blood pressure was measured via a brachial oscillometric cuff. Data were compared via ANOVA. All data are reported as means ± standard deviation. Compared to the young group (71 ± 5 mmHg), mean arterial pressure was higher in the older (83 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) and HFpEF groups (86 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001). Minimum and maximum aortic areas were greater in the older and HFpEF groups (both, P < 0.01). Peak descending aortic strain (young: 11.4% ± 2.2%; older: 4.8% ± 1.6%; HFpEF 3.8% ± 1.6%) and absolute distension were lower (all, P < 0.02) in the older and HFpEF groups compared to the young. Peak descending aortic strain and strain rates are sensitive to age and may provide a novel assessment of arterial stiffness for longitudinal studies that utilize or have utilized CMR.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.