Efficacy of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma: a self-control study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wenqing Ye, Xiaowei Xu, Haishuang Lin, Jinxin Li, Shuqing Zhu, Yanqian Xie, Shaodan Zhang, Yuanbo Liang
{"title":"Efficacy of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma: a self-control study.","authors":"Wenqing Ye, Xiaowei Xu, Haishuang Lin, Jinxin Li, Shuqing Zhu, Yanqian Xie, Shaodan Zhang, Yuanbo Liang","doi":"10.1159/000546133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Schlemm's canal-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) are gaining increasing recognition and acceptance, but majority of these MIGSs are recommended in eyes with open angle. Bleb-independent penetrating canaloplasty (PCP) restores physiological aqueous outflow in eyes with both open and closed angles. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative management of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is prospective self-control case series in a tertiary hospital in China. A total of 54 eyes from 27 patients with bilateral primary open angle glaucoma (n=18) or primary angle-closure glaucoma (n=9) were included. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (TRAB) was performed in one eye, while PCP was performed in the contralateral fellow eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, surgery-related complications and postoperative interventions were compared between groups. Complete (without medication) and qualified success (with/without medication) were defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% IOP reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IOP decreased from 32.5±8.87mmHg on 2.3±1.43 medications at baseline to 14.6±4.41mmHg on 0.20±0.58 medications at 12 months in TRAB group (both p<0.0001) and from 30.0±9.61mmHg on 2.7±1.10 medications to 14.8±4.63mmHg on 0.12±0.44 medications in PCP group (both p<0.0001). Equal complete success (84.0%, P>0.999) was achieved at 12 months in two groups. Although not statistically significant, higher qualified success was observed in TRAB (96.0%) than in PCP group (88.0%, p=0.609) at 12 month. However, 63.0% eyes (n=17) in TRAB group needed bleb managements to maintain a lower IOP. Transient IOP spike (>25mmHg, 22.2%) and microhyphaema (22.2%) were the most common complications for PCP, while hypotony (14.8%) and wound leakage (11.1%) were frequently seen after TRAB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Penetrating canaloplasty demonstrates comparable IOP-lowering effect with trabeculectomy in eyes with primary glaucoma, but with less post-operative complications and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Schlemm's canal-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) are gaining increasing recognition and acceptance, but majority of these MIGSs are recommended in eyes with open angle. Bleb-independent penetrating canaloplasty (PCP) restores physiological aqueous outflow in eyes with both open and closed angles. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative management of penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in patients with bilateral primary glaucoma.

Methods: This study is prospective self-control case series in a tertiary hospital in China. A total of 54 eyes from 27 patients with bilateral primary open angle glaucoma (n=18) or primary angle-closure glaucoma (n=9) were included. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (TRAB) was performed in one eye, while PCP was performed in the contralateral fellow eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, surgery-related complications and postoperative interventions were compared between groups. Complete (without medication) and qualified success (with/without medication) were defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% IOP reduction.

Results: Mean IOP decreased from 32.5±8.87mmHg on 2.3±1.43 medications at baseline to 14.6±4.41mmHg on 0.20±0.58 medications at 12 months in TRAB group (both p<0.0001) and from 30.0±9.61mmHg on 2.7±1.10 medications to 14.8±4.63mmHg on 0.12±0.44 medications in PCP group (both p<0.0001). Equal complete success (84.0%, P>0.999) was achieved at 12 months in two groups. Although not statistically significant, higher qualified success was observed in TRAB (96.0%) than in PCP group (88.0%, p=0.609) at 12 month. However, 63.0% eyes (n=17) in TRAB group needed bleb managements to maintain a lower IOP. Transient IOP spike (>25mmHg, 22.2%) and microhyphaema (22.2%) were the most common complications for PCP, while hypotony (14.8%) and wound leakage (11.1%) were frequently seen after TRAB.

Conclusion: Penetrating canaloplasty demonstrates comparable IOP-lowering effect with trabeculectomy in eyes with primary glaucoma, but with less post-operative complications and interventions.

穿透性小管成形术与小梁切除术治疗双侧原发性青光眼的疗效:一项自我控制研究。
导论:Schlemm氏管微创青光眼手术(MIGSs)越来越受到人们的认可和接受,但这些微创青光眼手术大多推荐用于开角眼。不依赖水泡的穿透性小管成形术(PCP)可恢复开闭角度眼的生理性水流出。我们的目的是比较穿透性小管成形术与小梁切除术治疗双侧原发性青光眼的疗效、安全性和术后处理。方法:采用国内某三级医院前瞻性自控病例系列进行研究。共纳入27例双侧原发性开角型青光眼(18例)或原发性闭角型青光眼(9例)的54只眼。单眼行丝裂霉素C (TRAB)小梁切除术,对侧眼行PCP手术。比较两组患者眼压(IOP)、青光眼用药次数、手术相关并发症及术后干预措施。完全(无药物治疗)和合格成功(有/无药物治疗)定义为IOP≤21 mmHg和IOP降低≥20%。结果:TRAB组12个月平均IOP由基线时(2.3±1.43种药物)的32.5±8.87mmHg降至0.20±0.58种药物的14.6±4.41mmHg(均为p25mmHg, 22.2%),微出血(22.2%)是PCP最常见的并发症,TRAB后常见低眼压(14.8%)和创面漏(11.1%)。结论:穿透性小管成形术治疗原发性青光眼的降眼压效果与小梁切除术相当,但术后并发症和干预措施较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信