Deep learning for automated segmentation of brain edema in meningioma after radiosurgery.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Huai-Che Yang, Tzu-Chiang Peng, Zhi-Hong Chen, Cheng-Chia Lee, Hsiu-Mei Wu, I-Chun Lai, Ching-Jen Chen, Syu-Jyun Peng
{"title":"Deep learning for automated segmentation of brain edema in meningioma after radiosurgery.","authors":"Huai-Che Yang, Tzu-Chiang Peng, Zhi-Hong Chen, Cheng-Chia Lee, Hsiu-Mei Wu, I-Chun Lai, Ching-Jen Chen, Syu-Jyun Peng","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01660-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is commonly used to treat benign brain tumors, such as meningioma, irradiating the surrounding brain tissue can lead to perifocal edema within a few months after the procedure. Volumetric assessment of perifocal edema is crucial for therapy planning and monitoring. Post-radiosurgery changes in perifocal edema, appearing as hyper-dense areas in magnetic resonance T2-weighted (T2w) images, are clearly identifiable; however, physicians lack tools to segment and quantify the volume of these T2w hyper-dense areas. This has hindered not only the quantification of severity but also research on edema growth and case differentiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we trained a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) to replace manual pre-processing in designating regions of interest. We also applied transfer learning to the DeepMedic deep learning model to facilitate the automatic segmentation and quantification of brain edema regions in images. The resulting quantitative findings were used to explore the effects of GKRS treatment on brain edema caused by meningioma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 21 patients with meningiomas who had undergone GKRS treatment based on 154 regularly tracked T2w scans. From this group, we selected 130 scans for random assignment to a training set (80 scans), validation set (30 scans), and test set (20 scans). The actual range of the edema in the T2w images was labeled manually by a clinical radiologist to serve as the gold standard in supervised learning. The trained model was tasked with segmenting the test set for comparison with the manual segmentation results. The average Dice similarity coefficient in these comparisons was 84.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed scheme for the automated segmentation and quantification of brain edema post-radiosurgery demonstrated excellent results, suggesting its applicability to the development of predictive models.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01660-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is commonly used to treat benign brain tumors, such as meningioma, irradiating the surrounding brain tissue can lead to perifocal edema within a few months after the procedure. Volumetric assessment of perifocal edema is crucial for therapy planning and monitoring. Post-radiosurgery changes in perifocal edema, appearing as hyper-dense areas in magnetic resonance T2-weighted (T2w) images, are clearly identifiable; however, physicians lack tools to segment and quantify the volume of these T2w hyper-dense areas. This has hindered not only the quantification of severity but also research on edema growth and case differentiation.

Methods: In this study, we trained a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) to replace manual pre-processing in designating regions of interest. We also applied transfer learning to the DeepMedic deep learning model to facilitate the automatic segmentation and quantification of brain edema regions in images. The resulting quantitative findings were used to explore the effects of GKRS treatment on brain edema caused by meningioma.

Results: We studied 21 patients with meningiomas who had undergone GKRS treatment based on 154 regularly tracked T2w scans. From this group, we selected 130 scans for random assignment to a training set (80 scans), validation set (30 scans), and test set (20 scans). The actual range of the edema in the T2w images was labeled manually by a clinical radiologist to serve as the gold standard in supervised learning. The trained model was tasked with segmenting the test set for comparison with the manual segmentation results. The average Dice similarity coefficient in these comparisons was 84.7%.

Conclusions: The proposed scheme for the automated segmentation and quantification of brain edema post-radiosurgery demonstrated excellent results, suggesting its applicability to the development of predictive models.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

深度学习在脑膜瘤放射术后脑水肿自动分割中的应用。
背景:虽然伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)通常用于治疗良性脑肿瘤,如脑膜瘤,但在手术后几个月内,对周围脑组织进行照射可导致病灶周围水肿。局部水肿的体积评估对治疗计划和监测至关重要。放射术后病灶周围水肿的改变,在磁共振t2加权(T2w)图像上表现为高密度区,可清晰识别;然而,医生缺乏工具来分割和量化这些T2w高密度区域的体积。这不仅阻碍了严重程度的量化,也阻碍了水肿生长和病例鉴别的研究。方法:在本研究中,我们训练了一个基于Mask区域的卷积神经网络(Mask R-CNN)来代替人工预处理来指定感兴趣的区域。我们还将迁移学习应用到DeepMedic深度学习模型中,以促进图像中脑水肿区域的自动分割和量化。定量结果用于探讨GKRS治疗脑膜瘤所致脑水肿的效果。结果:我们研究了21例接受GKRS治疗的脑膜瘤患者,基于154例定期追踪的T2w扫描。从这一组中,我们选择了130次扫描随机分配到训练集(80次扫描)、验证集(30次扫描)和测试集(20次扫描)。T2w图像中水肿的实际范围由临床放射科医生手动标记,作为监督学习的金标准。训练模型的任务是对测试集进行分割,以便与手动分割结果进行比较。在这些比较中,Dice的平均相似系数为84.7%。结论:提出的放疗后脑水肿自动分割与定量方案效果良好,适用于预测模型的开发。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信