A comparative evaluation of salivary and plasma bisphenol-A levels in patients released from four different orthodontic appliances: ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry study. A non-randomized clinical trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Serdar Cik, Nihat Kilic, Alptug Atila
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of salivary and plasma bisphenol-A levels in patients released from four different orthodontic appliances: ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry study. A non-randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Serdar Cik, Nihat Kilic, Alptug Atila","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the amount of bisphenol-A (BPA) released from different orthodontic appliances into saliva and plasma and to compare BPA levels between orthodontic appliance groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized clinical trial included 78 patients, and they were divided into four groups: fixed appliance, temporary anchorage devices (TADs), removable appliance, and functional appliance groups. Saliva and plasma samples were collected before treatment/appliance wear (T0) and one day (T1), one week (T2), and one month (T3) after treatment/appliance wear. Saliva and plasma BPA levels were analysed using Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Data was analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests with Bonferroni correction. Correlations between saliva and plasma BPA levels at different time points were evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BPA levels ranged from 0.07-7.28 ng/ml in saliva samples and from 0.17-12.51 ng/ml in plasma samples in all groups. Within-group comparisons showed no significant changes over time (p > 0.0125) in each group. Between-group comparisons showed significantly higher saliva BPA levels in the fixed appliance group compared to the other groups (p < 0.017), with no significant differences in plasma BPA levels between groups (p < 0.0175). Positive correlations were observed between saliva BPA measurements, whereas positive correlation was observed only between T0 and T3 plasma PBA levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research obviously demonstrated that the orthodontic appliances we investigated release BPA into the saliva. However, the BPA levels detected in both saliva and plasma are consistently within the acceptable safety limits. However, precautions should be taken to minimize BPA release during orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the amount of bisphenol-A (BPA) released from different orthodontic appliances into saliva and plasma and to compare BPA levels between orthodontic appliance groups.

Methods: This non-randomized clinical trial included 78 patients, and they were divided into four groups: fixed appliance, temporary anchorage devices (TADs), removable appliance, and functional appliance groups. Saliva and plasma samples were collected before treatment/appliance wear (T0) and one day (T1), one week (T2), and one month (T3) after treatment/appliance wear. Saliva and plasma BPA levels were analysed using Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Data was analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests with Bonferroni correction. Correlations between saliva and plasma BPA levels at different time points were evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results: BPA levels ranged from 0.07-7.28 ng/ml in saliva samples and from 0.17-12.51 ng/ml in plasma samples in all groups. Within-group comparisons showed no significant changes over time (p > 0.0125) in each group. Between-group comparisons showed significantly higher saliva BPA levels in the fixed appliance group compared to the other groups (p < 0.017), with no significant differences in plasma BPA levels between groups (p < 0.0175). Positive correlations were observed between saliva BPA measurements, whereas positive correlation was observed only between T0 and T3 plasma PBA levels.

Conclusion: This research obviously demonstrated that the orthodontic appliances we investigated release BPA into the saliva. However, the BPA levels detected in both saliva and plasma are consistently within the acceptable safety limits. However, precautions should be taken to minimize BPA release during orthodontic treatment.

四种不同正畸矫治器释放患者唾液和血浆双酚A水平的比较评估:超高效液相色谱-质谱研究一项非随机临床试验。
目的:评价不同正畸矫治器释放到唾液和血浆中的双酚a (BPA)含量,并比较不同矫治器组间BPA含量的差异。方法:78例患者随机分为固定矫治器组、临时锚固器组、可移动矫治器组和功能矫治器组。分别于治疗前(T0)、治疗后1天(T1)、1周(T2)、1个月(T3)采集唾液和血浆样本。采用超高效液相色谱-质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)分析唾液和血浆双酚a水平。数据分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey HSD多重比较检验,并进行Bonferroni校正。采用Pearson相关分析评价不同时间点唾液和血浆BPA水平的相关性。结果:各组唾液样本中BPA含量为0.07-7.28 ng/ml,血浆样本中BPA含量为0.17-12.51 ng/ml。组内比较显示各组随时间无显著变化(p > 0.0125)。组间比较显示,固定矫治器组的唾液BPA含量明显高于其他组(p)。结论:本研究明显表明,我们所研究的正畸矫治器向唾液中释放BPA。然而,在唾液和血浆中检测到的BPA水平始终在可接受的安全范围内。然而,在正畸治疗期间,应该采取预防措施,尽量减少双酚a的释放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信