Is the risk of developing a Crohn's disease increased after appendectomy? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Isabelle Uhe, Eleftherios Gialamas, Christophe Combescure, Christian Toso, Emilie Liot, Guillaume Meurette, Frederic Ris, Jeremy Meyer
{"title":"Is the risk of developing a Crohn's disease increased after appendectomy? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.","authors":"Isabelle Uhe, Eleftherios Gialamas, Christophe Combescure, Christian Toso, Emilie Liot, Guillaume Meurette, Frederic Ris, Jeremy Meyer","doi":"10.1159/000545339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The effect of appendectomy on the development of Crohn's disease (CD) is a matter of debate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to gather the latest published data to determine whether patients with a history of appendectomy have an increased risk of developing CD or not. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for case-control and cohort studies assessing the risk of developing CD after appendectomy. The pooled adjusted and not adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for case-control studies. Heterogeneity was assessed. Studies were ranked using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and were all of good quality. Results Fourteen case-control studies and 6 cohort studies were included. Meta-analysis of case-control studies (33'243 patients) of raw Odds Ratio shows a positive association between appendectomy and CD (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.97 to 2.36, I2=87%), which was not statistically significant (p=0.069). The meta-analysis of adjusted Odds Ratio shows that appendectomy represents a statistically significant risk factor for the development of CD (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.45, p=0.047. I2=89%). Conclusion Appendectomy appears to be a risk factor for the development of CD. However, the discrepant results obtained by meta-analysis of unadjusted OR, the heterogeneity between studies, and the lack of precision of the magnitude of the association mandate confirmation by a large epidemiological study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The effect of appendectomy on the development of Crohn's disease (CD) is a matter of debate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to gather the latest published data to determine whether patients with a history of appendectomy have an increased risk of developing CD or not. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for case-control and cohort studies assessing the risk of developing CD after appendectomy. The pooled adjusted and not adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for case-control studies. Heterogeneity was assessed. Studies were ranked using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and were all of good quality. Results Fourteen case-control studies and 6 cohort studies were included. Meta-analysis of case-control studies (33'243 patients) of raw Odds Ratio shows a positive association between appendectomy and CD (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.97 to 2.36, I2=87%), which was not statistically significant (p=0.069). The meta-analysis of adjusted Odds Ratio shows that appendectomy represents a statistically significant risk factor for the development of CD (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.45, p=0.047. I2=89%). Conclusion Appendectomy appears to be a risk factor for the development of CD. However, the discrepant results obtained by meta-analysis of unadjusted OR, the heterogeneity between studies, and the lack of precision of the magnitude of the association mandate confirmation by a large epidemiological study.

阑尾切除术后患克罗恩病的风险增加了吗?对文献和荟萃分析进行系统回顾。
阑尾切除术对克罗恩病(CD)发展的影响是一个有争议的问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是收集最新发表的数据,以确定有阑尾切除术史的患者是否会增加患乳糜泻的风险。方法检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,检索评估阑尾切除术后发生CD风险的病例对照和队列研究。对病例对照研究计算合并调整和未调整的优势比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)。评估异质性。研究使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行排名,所有研究的质量都很好。结果纳入14项病例对照研究和6项队列研究。病例对照研究(33’243例)的meta分析显示,阑尾切除术与CD呈正相关(OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.97 ~ 2.36, I2=87%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.069)。校正优势比的荟萃分析显示,阑尾切除术是CD发生的具有统计学意义的危险因素(OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01 ~ 3.45, p=0.047)。I2 = 89%)。结论:阑尾切除术似乎是发生CD的一个危险因素。然而,未调整OR的meta分析结果存在差异,研究之间存在异质性,且大型流行病学研究缺乏相关性程度的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信