Comparative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics for the differential diagnosis of breast mass lesions.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yangping Yang, Jiong Liu, Jian Shu
{"title":"Comparative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics for the differential diagnosis of breast mass lesions.","authors":"Yangping Yang, Jiong Liu, Jian Shu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01654-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer's diagnostic challenge is amplified by its heterogeneity. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) offers promising avenues for precise tumor characterization through Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) metrics.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic utility of advanced ADC metrics in distinguishing breast lesions using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis of MRI data from 125 pathologically confirmed breast tumors was conducted. ADC values were independently measured by two physicians at the lesion sites and reference points (contralateral normal breast parenchyma, pectoralis major, and interventricular septum), from which advanced ADC metrics were calculated. Statistical analyses were applied to differentiate ADC metrics between malignant and benign groups. ROC curves assessed the diagnostic efficacy of individual ADC metrics. A binary logistic regression model incorporating ADC metrics and age was developed, with its diagnostic superiority evaluated through multidimensional comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 125 lesions, 77 were malignant and 48 benign. Significant differences in ADC metrics were found between malignant and benign tumors. Diagnostic analysis showed minimum ADC value (ADC_min) as the most effective single indicator, while the combined model, including age and average ADC value (ADC_avg), outperformed individual ADC metrics, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.964). The combined model nomogram also showed improved clinical utility and a significant increase in diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced ADC metrics significantly enhance the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. The development of a combined model further refines breast cancer diagnostics, supporting the advancement towards precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01654-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer's diagnostic challenge is amplified by its heterogeneity. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) offers promising avenues for precise tumor characterization through Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) metrics.

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic utility of advanced ADC metrics in distinguishing breast lesions using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of MRI data from 125 pathologically confirmed breast tumors was conducted. ADC values were independently measured by two physicians at the lesion sites and reference points (contralateral normal breast parenchyma, pectoralis major, and interventricular septum), from which advanced ADC metrics were calculated. Statistical analyses were applied to differentiate ADC metrics between malignant and benign groups. ROC curves assessed the diagnostic efficacy of individual ADC metrics. A binary logistic regression model incorporating ADC metrics and age was developed, with its diagnostic superiority evaluated through multidimensional comparisons.

Results: Of the 125 lesions, 77 were malignant and 48 benign. Significant differences in ADC metrics were found between malignant and benign tumors. Diagnostic analysis showed minimum ADC value (ADC_min) as the most effective single indicator, while the combined model, including age and average ADC value (ADC_avg), outperformed individual ADC metrics, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.964). The combined model nomogram also showed improved clinical utility and a significant increase in diagnostic performance.

Conclusions: Advanced ADC metrics significantly enhance the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. The development of a combined model further refines breast cancer diagnostics, supporting the advancement towards precision medicine.

表观扩散系数(ADC)指标对乳腺肿块病变鉴别诊断的比较分析。
背景:乳腺癌的异质性加大了其诊断难度。扩散加权成像(DWI)通过表观扩散系数(ADC)指标为精确表征肿瘤提供了有希望的途径。目的:探讨先进ADC指标在磁共振成像(MRI)鉴别乳腺病变中的诊断作用。方法:回顾性分析125例经病理证实的乳腺肿瘤的MRI资料。ADC值由两名医生在病变部位和参考点(对侧正常乳腺实质、胸大肌和室间隔)独立测量,并以此计算高级ADC指标。应用统计学分析来区分良性组和恶性组的ADC指标。ROC曲线评估个体ADC指标的诊断效能。建立了包含ADC指标和年龄的二元逻辑回归模型,并通过多维比较评估其诊断优势。结果:125例病变中,恶性77例,良性48例。良性肿瘤和恶性肿瘤的ADC指标存在显著差异。诊断分析显示,最小ADC值(ADC_min)是最有效的单一指标,而包括年龄和平均ADC值(ADC_avg)的组合模型优于单个ADC指标,显示出更高的诊断准确性(曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.964)。联合模型图也显示出改善的临床效用和诊断性能的显着增加。结论:先进的ADC指标显著提高了乳腺良恶性病变的诊断准确性。联合模型的开发进一步完善了乳腺癌诊断,支持了精准医学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信