Mohamed Elfil, Hazem Ghaith, Eris Spirollari, Ariel Sacknovitz, Ankita Jain, Jon Rosenberg, Andrew Bauerschmidt, Stephan A Mayer, Chirag Gandhi, Fawaz Al-Mufti
{"title":"Enhancing Outcomes in Subdural Hematoma: The Role of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization.","authors":"Mohamed Elfil, Hazem Ghaith, Eris Spirollari, Ariel Sacknovitz, Ankita Jain, Jon Rosenberg, Andrew Bauerschmidt, Stephan A Mayer, Chirag Gandhi, Fawaz Al-Mufti","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition with increasing incidence, especially among the elderly. The pathophysiology of cSDH is multifactorial, involving inflammation, fibrinolysis, and angiogenesis, with fragile neovascularization contributing to recurrent microbleeding and hematoma persistence. While burr-hole evacuation remains a standard surgical approach, recurrence rates remain high, necessitating adjunctive strategies such as subdural drain placement, subdural-peritoneal shunting, and pharmacologic interventions. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising adjunctive therapy for cSDH by targeting the abnormal neovascularization of the dura and within the hematoma's outer membrane. In this meta-analysis, we pooled data from 4 recent clinical trials (EMBOLISE, STEM, MAGIC-MT, and MEMBRANE) to evaluate MMAE's efficacy and safety. Our results demonstrate that MMAE plus usual care significantly reduces recurrence or residual cSDH compared with standard care alone (RR = 0.56, P = 0.001), and is associated with lower mortality (RR = 0.54, P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in functional outcomes, serious adverse events, or major disabling stroke. These findings highlight MMAE as an effective adjunct in cSDH management. Future studies should aim to further assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness, as well as refine the optimal patient selection criteria for MMAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":"470-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition with increasing incidence, especially among the elderly. The pathophysiology of cSDH is multifactorial, involving inflammation, fibrinolysis, and angiogenesis, with fragile neovascularization contributing to recurrent microbleeding and hematoma persistence. While burr-hole evacuation remains a standard surgical approach, recurrence rates remain high, necessitating adjunctive strategies such as subdural drain placement, subdural-peritoneal shunting, and pharmacologic interventions. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising adjunctive therapy for cSDH by targeting the abnormal neovascularization of the dura and within the hematoma's outer membrane. In this meta-analysis, we pooled data from 4 recent clinical trials (EMBOLISE, STEM, MAGIC-MT, and MEMBRANE) to evaluate MMAE's efficacy and safety. Our results demonstrate that MMAE plus usual care significantly reduces recurrence or residual cSDH compared with standard care alone (RR = 0.56, P = 0.001), and is associated with lower mortality (RR = 0.54, P = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in functional outcomes, serious adverse events, or major disabling stroke. These findings highlight MMAE as an effective adjunct in cSDH management. Future studies should aim to further assess long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness, as well as refine the optimal patient selection criteria for MMAE.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal