Gender, tobacco and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis of the 2020 National Health Interview Survey.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Alexander W Steinberg, Jenny E Ozga, Zhiqun Tang, Cassandra A Stanton, James D Sargent, Laura M Paulin
{"title":"Gender, tobacco and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis of the 2020 National Health Interview Survey.","authors":"Alexander W Steinberg, Jenny E Ozga, Zhiqun Tang, Cassandra A Stanton, James D Sargent, Laura M Paulin","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Recent studies describe an increasing prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and higher COPD exacerbation rates among women compared with men despite lower average cigarette use, which has raised the question of whether women are more susceptible to the effects of tobacco smoke. We examined associations between gender, cigarette smoking and COPD in a national dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional data for US respondents aged ≥40 years from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Weighted multivariable logistic regressions assessed the relationship between gender and respondent-reported physician-diagnosed COPD, adjusting for tobacco use and sociodemographic covariates. Additional analyses were performed to determine if the relationship between cigarette smoking and COPD was modified by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had a higher COPD prevalence (7.8%) than men (6.5%) despite lower cigarette smoke exposure. Women were less likely to have ever smoked, and among respondents who had smoked, women had a lower average pack-year history compared with men. In multivariable regressions, female gender was associated with a higher risk of COPD (adjusted risk ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.65) and the relative risk was similar for respondents both with and without a history of smoking. Moreover, there was no significant interaction between gender and smoking status or gender and pack-year exposure relating to COPD prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults aged ≥40 years, women had a roughly 50% greater risk of COPD than men. Higher susceptibility to cigarette smoking in women did not explain the difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Recent studies describe an increasing prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and higher COPD exacerbation rates among women compared with men despite lower average cigarette use, which has raised the question of whether women are more susceptible to the effects of tobacco smoke. We examined associations between gender, cigarette smoking and COPD in a national dataset.

Methods: We used cross-sectional data for US respondents aged ≥40 years from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Weighted multivariable logistic regressions assessed the relationship between gender and respondent-reported physician-diagnosed COPD, adjusting for tobacco use and sociodemographic covariates. Additional analyses were performed to determine if the relationship between cigarette smoking and COPD was modified by gender.

Results: Women had a higher COPD prevalence (7.8%) than men (6.5%) despite lower cigarette smoke exposure. Women were less likely to have ever smoked, and among respondents who had smoked, women had a lower average pack-year history compared with men. In multivariable regressions, female gender was associated with a higher risk of COPD (adjusted risk ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.65) and the relative risk was similar for respondents both with and without a history of smoking. Moreover, there was no significant interaction between gender and smoking status or gender and pack-year exposure relating to COPD prevalence.

Conclusions: Among adults aged ≥40 years, women had a roughly 50% greater risk of COPD than men. Higher susceptibility to cigarette smoking in women did not explain the difference.

性别、烟草和慢性阻塞性肺病:对2020年全国健康访谈调查的分析
理由:最近的研究表明,尽管平均香烟使用量较低,但与男性相比,女性慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患病率上升,COPD恶化率更高,这就提出了一个问题,即女性是否更容易受到烟草烟雾的影响。我们在全国数据集中研究了性别、吸烟和慢性阻塞性肺病之间的关系。方法:我们使用来自2020年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)的年龄≥40岁的美国受访者的横断面数据。加权多变量逻辑回归评估了性别与受访者报告的医生诊断的COPD之间的关系,调整了烟草使用和社会人口统计学协变量。还进行了其他分析,以确定吸烟与COPD之间的关系是否受到性别的影响。结果:尽管吸烟暴露较低,但女性COPD患病率(7.8%)高于男性(6.5%)。女性不太可能曾经吸烟,在吸烟的受访者中,女性的平均吸烟史比男性低。在多变量回归中,女性与COPD的高风险相关(调整后的风险比为1.47,95% CI为1.30至1.65),有和没有吸烟史的受访者的相对风险相似。此外,性别与吸烟状况或性别与包年暴露与COPD患病率之间没有显著的相互作用。结论:在年龄≥40岁的成年人中,女性患COPD的风险比男性大约高50%。女性更容易吸烟并不能解释这一差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信