Alberto Jorge de Sousa Guimarães, Nelson Sass, Adalberto Kiochi Aguemi, Eliana Bonilha, Eneida Ramos Vico, Marina de Freitas, Mirna Namie Okamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Liliam Cristine Rolo, Maria Regina Torloni
{"title":"Intervention using the Robson classification as a tool to reduce cesarean section rates in six public hospitals in Brazil.","authors":"Alberto Jorge de Sousa Guimarães, Nelson Sass, Adalberto Kiochi Aguemi, Eliana Bonilha, Eneida Ramos Vico, Marina de Freitas, Mirna Namie Okamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Liliam Cristine Rolo, Maria Regina Torloni","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effectiveness and safety of a multifaceted intervention to reduce cesarean section (CS) rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interrupted time series study involved six public hospitals with pre-intervention CS rates>35 %. We collected monthly data on overall and Robson group CS rates of 37,031 women who gave birth at the six hospitals during 30 months in the pre-intervention (12 months, n=14,836 women), intervention (6 months, n=6,431 women), and post-intervention (12 months, n=15,764 women) study periods. The intervention bundle included six components: audit and feedback using the Robson classification, goal setting for overall CS rate, distribution of evidence-based guidelines, informative meetings with hospital coordinators, newsletters, and inter-hospital mentoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant changes in mean overall CS rates between the three periods. However, five of the six hospitals had a significant decrease in CS rates in at least one Robson group during the study period: groups 1 and 5a (2 hospitals), group 2a (1 hospital), groups 4 and 4a (1 hospital), and group 5b (1 hospital). There were no significant increases in adverse events (maternal and perinatal mortality, neonatal asphyxia) in any of the hospitals with reductions in CS rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifaceted intervention did not significantly reduce the overall CS rate in the participating hospitals. However, five of the six hospitals had significant reductions in CS rates in at least one Robson group, without increasing adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of a multifaceted intervention to reduce cesarean section (CS) rates.
Methods: This interrupted time series study involved six public hospitals with pre-intervention CS rates>35 %. We collected monthly data on overall and Robson group CS rates of 37,031 women who gave birth at the six hospitals during 30 months in the pre-intervention (12 months, n=14,836 women), intervention (6 months, n=6,431 women), and post-intervention (12 months, n=15,764 women) study periods. The intervention bundle included six components: audit and feedback using the Robson classification, goal setting for overall CS rate, distribution of evidence-based guidelines, informative meetings with hospital coordinators, newsletters, and inter-hospital mentoring.
Results: There were no significant changes in mean overall CS rates between the three periods. However, five of the six hospitals had a significant decrease in CS rates in at least one Robson group during the study period: groups 1 and 5a (2 hospitals), group 2a (1 hospital), groups 4 and 4a (1 hospital), and group 5b (1 hospital). There were no significant increases in adverse events (maternal and perinatal mortality, neonatal asphyxia) in any of the hospitals with reductions in CS rates.
Conclusions: The multifaceted intervention did not significantly reduce the overall CS rate in the participating hospitals. However, five of the six hospitals had significant reductions in CS rates in at least one Robson group, without increasing adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.