Intervention using the Robson classification as a tool to reduce cesarean section rates in six public hospitals in Brazil.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alberto Jorge de Sousa Guimarães, Nelson Sass, Adalberto Kiochi Aguemi, Eliana Bonilha, Eneida Ramos Vico, Marina de Freitas, Mirna Namie Okamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Liliam Cristine Rolo, Maria Regina Torloni
{"title":"Intervention using the Robson classification as a tool to reduce cesarean section rates in six public hospitals in Brazil.","authors":"Alberto Jorge de Sousa Guimarães, Nelson Sass, Adalberto Kiochi Aguemi, Eliana Bonilha, Eneida Ramos Vico, Marina de Freitas, Mirna Namie Okamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Liliam Cristine Rolo, Maria Regina Torloni","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effectiveness and safety of a multifaceted intervention to reduce cesarean section (CS) rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interrupted time series study involved six public hospitals with pre-intervention CS rates>35 %. We collected monthly data on overall and Robson group CS rates of 37,031 women who gave birth at the six hospitals during 30 months in the pre-intervention (12 months, n=14,836 women), intervention (6 months, n=6,431 women), and post-intervention (12 months, n=15,764 women) study periods. The intervention bundle included six components: audit and feedback using the Robson classification, goal setting for overall CS rate, distribution of evidence-based guidelines, informative meetings with hospital coordinators, newsletters, and inter-hospital mentoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant changes in mean overall CS rates between the three periods. However, five of the six hospitals had a significant decrease in CS rates in at least one Robson group during the study period: groups 1 and 5a (2 hospitals), group 2a (1 hospital), groups 4 and 4a (1 hospital), and group 5b (1 hospital). There were no significant increases in adverse events (maternal and perinatal mortality, neonatal asphyxia) in any of the hospitals with reductions in CS rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifaceted intervention did not significantly reduce the overall CS rate in the participating hospitals. However, five of the six hospitals had significant reductions in CS rates in at least one Robson group, without increasing adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of a multifaceted intervention to reduce cesarean section (CS) rates.

Methods: This interrupted time series study involved six public hospitals with pre-intervention CS rates>35 %. We collected monthly data on overall and Robson group CS rates of 37,031 women who gave birth at the six hospitals during 30 months in the pre-intervention (12 months, n=14,836 women), intervention (6 months, n=6,431 women), and post-intervention (12 months, n=15,764 women) study periods. The intervention bundle included six components: audit and feedback using the Robson classification, goal setting for overall CS rate, distribution of evidence-based guidelines, informative meetings with hospital coordinators, newsletters, and inter-hospital mentoring.

Results: There were no significant changes in mean overall CS rates between the three periods. However, five of the six hospitals had a significant decrease in CS rates in at least one Robson group during the study period: groups 1 and 5a (2 hospitals), group 2a (1 hospital), groups 4 and 4a (1 hospital), and group 5b (1 hospital). There were no significant increases in adverse events (maternal and perinatal mortality, neonatal asphyxia) in any of the hospitals with reductions in CS rates.

Conclusions: The multifaceted intervention did not significantly reduce the overall CS rate in the participating hospitals. However, five of the six hospitals had significant reductions in CS rates in at least one Robson group, without increasing adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes.

干预使用罗布森分类作为工具,以减少剖宫产率在巴西六所公立医院。
目的:分析综合干预降低剖宫产率的有效性和安全性。方法:采用中断时间序列研究方法,对干预前CS率为bbb35 %的6家公立医院进行研究。我们收集了在干预前(12个月,n=14,836名妇女)、干预(6个月,n=6,431名妇女)和干预后(12个月,n=15,764名妇女)研究期间的30个月内在6家医院分娩的37,031名妇女的总体和Robson组CS率的月度数据。干预措施包包括六个组成部分:使用Robson分类的审计和反馈、总体CS率的目标设定、循证指南的分发、与医院协调员的信息会议、通讯和医院间指导。结果:三个时期的平均总CS率无显著变化。然而,在研究期间,6家医院中有5家至少在一个Robson组中CS率显著下降:1组和5a组(2家医院)、2a组(1家医院)、4组和4a组(1家医院)和5b组(1家医院)。在任何降低CS率的医院中,不良事件(孕产妇和围产期死亡率、新生儿窒息)都没有显著增加。结论:综合干预并未显著降低参与医院的总CS率。然而,六家医院中的五家至少在一个罗布森组中显著降低了CS率,但没有增加不良的孕产妇或围产期结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信