Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Informational Needs Questionnaire.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1111/odi.15375
Waleed Alamoudi, Abdullah Alsoghair, Richeal Ni Riordain, Stefano Fedele, Stephen Porter
{"title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Informational Needs Questionnaire.","authors":"Waleed Alamoudi, Abdullah Alsoghair, Richeal Ni Riordain, Stefano Fedele, Stephen Porter","doi":"10.1111/odi.15375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Information Needs Questionnaire (ODIN-Q) was developed to assess the informational needs of patients with oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). This study aimed to evaluate the six-factor ODIN-Q model to determine its psychometric properties and alignment with a theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with 165 participants to assess the model's fit. Consensus-based standards for selecting health measurement instruments were followed, and five participants per item in the assessment tool were required for effective CFA. Various fit indices, factor loadings and inter-factor correlations were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFA results indicated a moderate model fit, which was consistent with other multidimensional patient-reported instruments. The average factor loading for all 33 items was 0.58 (highest = 0.84, lowest = 0.28). Only two items with relatively low loadings (< 0.3) were related to doctors' experience and lifestyle adjustments. Additionally, the ODIN-Q distinguished conceptually distinct domains with low inter-factor correlations (< 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current six-factor ODIN-Q is a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing the informational needs of individuals with OED. Further cross-cultural assessments of the ODIN-Q are required to demonstrate its cultural sensitivity in other English-speaking patient cohorts and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Information Needs Questionnaire (ODIN-Q) was developed to assess the informational needs of patients with oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). This study aimed to evaluate the six-factor ODIN-Q model to determine its psychometric properties and alignment with a theoretical framework.

Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with 165 participants to assess the model's fit. Consensus-based standards for selecting health measurement instruments were followed, and five participants per item in the assessment tool were required for effective CFA. Various fit indices, factor loadings and inter-factor correlations were analysed.

Results: The CFA results indicated a moderate model fit, which was consistent with other multidimensional patient-reported instruments. The average factor loading for all 33 items was 0.58 (highest = 0.84, lowest = 0.28). Only two items with relatively low loadings (< 0.3) were related to doctors' experience and lifestyle adjustments. Additionally, the ODIN-Q distinguished conceptually distinct domains with low inter-factor correlations (< 0.20).

Conclusion: The current six-factor ODIN-Q is a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing the informational needs of individuals with OED. Further cross-cultural assessments of the ODIN-Q are required to demonstrate its cultural sensitivity in other English-speaking patient cohorts and globally.

口腔上皮发育不良信息需求问卷的验证性因素分析。
目的:制定口腔上皮发育不良信息需求问卷(ODIN-Q),以评估口腔上皮发育不良(OED)患者的信息需求。本研究旨在评估六因素ODIN-Q模型,以确定其心理测量特性和与理论框架的一致性。方法:采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对165名被试进行模型拟合评估。遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准,评估工具中的每个项目需要五名参与者才能有效地进行CFA。分析了各拟合指标、因子负荷和因子间相关性。结果:CFA结果显示适度的模型拟合,这与其他多维患者报告的工具一致。33项的平均因子负荷为0.58(最高= 0.84,最低= 0.28)。结论:目前的六因子ODIN-Q量表在心理测量学上是一种有效的评估英语阅读障碍个体信息需求的工具。需要对ODIN-Q进行进一步的跨文化评估,以证明其在其他英语患者群体和全球范围内的文化敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral diseases
Oral diseases 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
325
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信