Prognosis and Therapy of Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: Patient Selection and Surgical Management in Advanced Ovarian Cancer - What Tools Do We Have to Make the Right Decision?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1159/000545818
Alaa El Housheimi, Sara Tato Varela, Walther C Kuhn, Walther Kuhn
{"title":"Prognosis and Therapy of Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: Patient Selection and Surgical Management in Advanced Ovarian Cancer - What Tools Do We Have to Make the Right Decision?","authors":"Alaa El Housheimi, Sara Tato Varela, Walther C Kuhn, Walther Kuhn","doi":"10.1159/000545818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer is the gynecological cancer with the worst overall survival worldwide. Around 70% of patients are diagnosed in an advanced stage. Since low residual tumor after surgery has been repeatedly observed to deeply affect survival, achieving complete resection of tumor with no macroscopic residual disease through primary debulking surgery (PDS) has become the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) was introduced in order to improve resectability in patients who otherwise, due to advanced age, poor performance status, or extensive tumor burden, cannot be optimally operated. Patient-related factors like age, performance status, comorbidities, and nutritional status can all affect the survival and are all key factors in the selection process. Accurately assessing tumor extension and therefore allocating a patient to the NACT/IDS strategy is of great importance and can be achieved either through imaging (CT scan, ultrasound, MRI, PET scan) or laparoscopy using different validated laparoscopic scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>There is sizable randomized evidence to support the NACT/IDS as an acceptable strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, in whom a PDS is not possible or would have a suboptimal outcome. Patient- and tumor-related factors play a key role in allocating the right management plan to the right patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"524-531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer is the gynecological cancer with the worst overall survival worldwide. Around 70% of patients are diagnosed in an advanced stage. Since low residual tumor after surgery has been repeatedly observed to deeply affect survival, achieving complete resection of tumor with no macroscopic residual disease through primary debulking surgery (PDS) has become the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer.

Summary: The concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) was introduced in order to improve resectability in patients who otherwise, due to advanced age, poor performance status, or extensive tumor burden, cannot be optimally operated. Patient-related factors like age, performance status, comorbidities, and nutritional status can all affect the survival and are all key factors in the selection process. Accurately assessing tumor extension and therefore allocating a patient to the NACT/IDS strategy is of great importance and can be achieved either through imaging (CT scan, ultrasound, MRI, PET scan) or laparoscopy using different validated laparoscopic scoring systems.

Key messages: There is sizable randomized evidence to support the NACT/IDS as an acceptable strategy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, in whom a PDS is not possible or would have a suboptimal outcome. Patient- and tumor-related factors play a key role in allocating the right management plan to the right patient.

卵巢癌的预后和治疗,第一部分:晚期卵巢癌的患者选择和手术管理:我们有什么工具来做出正确的决定?
背景:卵巢癌是世界范围内总生存率最差的妇科肿瘤。大约70%的患者被诊断为晚期。由于多次观察到术后低残留肿瘤深刻影响生存,通过原发性减体积手术(primary debulking surgery, PDS)实现肿瘤完全切除无宏观残留病变已成为晚期卵巢癌的标准治疗。摘要:提出了新辅助化疗(NACT)后间隔减体积手术(IDS)的概念,以提高因高龄、身体状况不佳或肿瘤广泛而不能最佳手术的患者的可切除性。患者相关因素如年龄、体能状况、合并症、营养状况等都会影响患者的生存,是选择手术的关键因素。评估肿瘤扩展并因此将患者分配到NACT/IDS策略非常重要,可以通过成像(CT扫描、超声、MRI、PET扫描)或使用不同验证的腹腔镜评分系统进行腹腔镜检查。关键信息:有相当大的随机证据支持NACT/IDS作为晚期卵巢癌患者可接受的策略,其中PDS不可能或会有次优结果。患者和肿瘤相关因素在将正确的治疗方案分配给合适的患者方面起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信