A Scoring Model Using Multi-Metabolites Based on Untargeted Metabolomics for Assessing Dyslipidemia in Korean Individuals with Obesity.

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Metabolites Pub Date : 2025-04-17 DOI:10.3390/metabo15040279
Su-Geun Yang, Hye Jin Yoo
{"title":"A Scoring Model Using Multi-Metabolites Based on Untargeted Metabolomics for Assessing Dyslipidemia in Korean Individuals with Obesity.","authors":"Su-Geun Yang, Hye Jin Yoo","doi":"10.3390/metabo15040279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Metabolite risk score (MRS), which considers the collective effects of metabolites closely reflecting a phenotype, is a new approach for disease assessment, moving away from focusing solely on individual biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate a metabolite panel for dyslipidemia and verify the diagnostic efficacy of MRS on dyslipidemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key metabolite identification and MRS establishment were conducted in the discovery set, and MRS validation was performed in the replication set, with 50 healthy individuals and 50 dyslipidemia patients in each set. The MRS was constructed using key metabolites, identified via UPLC-MS/MS analysis, employing a weighted approach based on linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam and eicosapentaenoic acid were identified as key metabolites for dyslipidemia and were utilized for establishing the MRS. In addition to the MRS model, a conventional dyslipidemia diagnostic model based on lipid profiles, as well as a combined model (MRS + lipid profiles), were also established. In the discovery set, the MRS model diagnosed dyslipidemia with 85.4% accuracy. When combined with lipid profiles, accuracy improved to 91.8%. In the replication set, the MRS demonstrated diagnostic power with 76.1% accuracy, while the combined model achieved 86.0% accuracy for dyslipidemia assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS alone indicated sufficient assessment power in a real-world setting, despite a slight reduction in assessment ability when validated in the replication set. At this stage, therefore, the MRS serves as an auxiliary tool for disease diagnosis. This first attempt to apply MRS for dyslipidemia may offer a foundational concept for MRS in this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Metabolite risk score (MRS), which considers the collective effects of metabolites closely reflecting a phenotype, is a new approach for disease assessment, moving away from focusing solely on individual biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate a metabolite panel for dyslipidemia and verify the diagnostic efficacy of MRS on dyslipidemia.

Methods: Key metabolite identification and MRS establishment were conducted in the discovery set, and MRS validation was performed in the replication set, with 50 healthy individuals and 50 dyslipidemia patients in each set. The MRS was constructed using key metabolites, identified via UPLC-MS/MS analysis, employing a weighted approach based on linear regression analysis.

Results: N-acetylisoputreanine-γ-lactam and eicosapentaenoic acid were identified as key metabolites for dyslipidemia and were utilized for establishing the MRS. In addition to the MRS model, a conventional dyslipidemia diagnostic model based on lipid profiles, as well as a combined model (MRS + lipid profiles), were also established. In the discovery set, the MRS model diagnosed dyslipidemia with 85.4% accuracy. When combined with lipid profiles, accuracy improved to 91.8%. In the replication set, the MRS demonstrated diagnostic power with 76.1% accuracy, while the combined model achieved 86.0% accuracy for dyslipidemia assessment.

Conclusions: The MRS alone indicated sufficient assessment power in a real-world setting, despite a slight reduction in assessment ability when validated in the replication set. At this stage, therefore, the MRS serves as an auxiliary tool for disease diagnosis. This first attempt to apply MRS for dyslipidemia may offer a foundational concept for MRS in this disease.

基于非靶向代谢组学的多代谢物评分模型用于评估韩国肥胖个体的血脂异常。
背景/目的:代谢物风险评分(MRS)是一种新的疾病评估方法,它考虑了代谢物的集体效应,密切反映了一种表型,而不是仅仅关注个体生物标志物。本研究旨在探讨血脂异常的代谢物组,并验证MRS对血脂异常的诊断效果。方法:发现组进行关键代谢物鉴定和MRS建立,复制组进行MRS验证,每组50例健康个体和50例血脂异常患者。利用UPLC-MS/MS分析鉴定的关键代谢物,采用基于线性回归分析的加权方法构建MRS。结果:n -乙酰异嘌呤-γ-内酰胺和二十碳五烯酸被确定为血脂异常的关键代谢物,并被用于建立MRS模型,除MRS模型外,还建立了基于脂质谱的常规血脂异常诊断模型,以及MRS +脂质谱联合模型。在发现集中,MRS模型诊断血脂异常的准确率为85.4%。当与脂质谱结合时,准确率提高到91.8%。在复制集中,MRS的诊断准确率为76.1%,而联合模型对血脂异常的评估准确率为86.0%。结论:MRS单独显示了在真实世界环境中足够的评估能力,尽管在复制集验证时评估能力略有降低。因此,在这个阶段,磁共振成像作为疾病诊断的辅助工具。这是将MRS应用于血脂异常的首次尝试,可能为该疾病的MRS提供一个基础概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabolites
Metabolites Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍: Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信