Food Insecurity in the United States LGBTQ+ Population: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of All of Us Data.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Whitney R Linsenmeyer, Michelle R Dalton, Rowan Hollinger, Regina Huang, Katie Heiden-Rootes
{"title":"Food Insecurity in the United States LGBTQ+ Population: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of <i>All of Us</i> Data.","authors":"Whitney R Linsenmeyer, Michelle R Dalton, Rowan Hollinger, Regina Huang, Katie Heiden-Rootes","doi":"10.1177/03795721251332099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimTo assess food insecurity prevalence among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) population and to investigate variations by age, race and ethnicity, and gender identity.MethodsData were obtained from the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program, a longitudinal cohort study that includes 34 148 LGBTQ+ participants. Food insecurity prevalence was reported using descriptive analyses, and chi-square tests were performed for comparison between groups.Results6.7% of the LGBTQ+ population was food insecure with wide variance based on gender identity. Transgender participants were more likely to be food insecure than cisgender participants (9.8% vs 6.2%, <i>P</i> < .001). Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) LGBTQ+ participants were more likely to be food insecure than white counterparts (9.5% vs 5.4%, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionStandardized language to assess sex and gender identity will improve precision in food insecurity estimates. Wide variations in food insecurity prevalence persist among demographic variables with the highest rates among Black, transgender, and younger participants. Interventions are needed to address food insecurity, especially among BIPOC and transgender populations.SummaryBased on newly data available from over 34 000 LGBTQ+ people, food insecurity impacts groups within the United States differently. Transgender people experience food insecurity at higher levels than cisgender people, and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) are impacted by food insecurity at higher levels than white communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3795721251332099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251332099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo assess food insecurity prevalence among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) population and to investigate variations by age, race and ethnicity, and gender identity.MethodsData were obtained from the All of Us Research Program, a longitudinal cohort study that includes 34 148 LGBTQ+ participants. Food insecurity prevalence was reported using descriptive analyses, and chi-square tests were performed for comparison between groups.Results6.7% of the LGBTQ+ population was food insecure with wide variance based on gender identity. Transgender participants were more likely to be food insecure than cisgender participants (9.8% vs 6.2%, P < .001). Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) LGBTQ+ participants were more likely to be food insecure than white counterparts (9.5% vs 5.4%, P < .001).ConclusionStandardized language to assess sex and gender identity will improve precision in food insecurity estimates. Wide variations in food insecurity prevalence persist among demographic variables with the highest rates among Black, transgender, and younger participants. Interventions are needed to address food insecurity, especially among BIPOC and transgender populations.SummaryBased on newly data available from over 34 000 LGBTQ+ people, food insecurity impacts groups within the United States differently. Transgender people experience food insecurity at higher levels than cisgender people, and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) are impacted by food insecurity at higher levels than white communities.

美国LGBTQ+人口的粮食不安全:对我们所有人数据的横断面分析。
目的评估女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿或质疑(LGBTQ+)人群的食品不安全状况,并调查年龄、种族和民族以及性别认同的差异。方法数据来自“我们所有人”研究项目,这是一项纵向队列研究,包括34148名LGBTQ+参与者。结果LGBTQ+人群中有6.7%的人存在粮食不安全状况,且性别认同差异较大。跨性别参与者比顺性别参与者更有可能出现食物不安全(9.8% vs 6.2%, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信