Reduced Weight Gain with Pioglitazone vs Vildagliptin in CREBRF rs373863828 A-allele Carriers: Insights from the WORTH Trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zanetta L L Toomata, Yannan Jiang, Rui Qian Yeu, Rebecca Brandon, Ry Yves Tweedie-Cullen, Norma Nehren, Glenn Doherty, Huti Watson, Kerry A Macaskill-Smith, Megan Leask, Tony R Merriman, Ryan Paul, Troy L Merry, Peter R Shepherd, Rinki Murphy
{"title":"Reduced Weight Gain with Pioglitazone vs Vildagliptin in <i>CREBRF</i> rs373863828 A-allele Carriers: Insights from the WORTH Trial.","authors":"Zanetta L L Toomata, Yannan Jiang, Rui Qian Yeu, Rebecca Brandon, Ry Yves Tweedie-Cullen, Norma Nehren, Glenn Doherty, Huti Watson, Kerry A Macaskill-Smith, Megan Leask, Tony R Merriman, Ryan Paul, Troy L Merry, Peter R Shepherd, Rinki Murphy","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S500336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This subgroup analysis of a randomised, open-label, two-period crossover trial in Aotearoa New Zealand (February 2019 to March 2020) assessed whether the glucose-lowering effects of vildagliptin, vs pioglitazone varied by the <i>CREBRF</i> (p.Arg457Gln) rs373863828 genotype.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c > 58 mmol/mol (>7.5%) received either pioglitazone (30 mg) or vildagliptin (50 mg) for 16 weeks, then switched medications for another 16 weeks. Differences in HbA1c between treatments (pioglitazone vs vildagliptin) were tested for an interaction with <i>CREBRF</i> rs373863828 A-allele carrier status and controlling for baseline HbA1c using linear mixed models. Secondary endpoints included weight, systolic blood pressure, and diabetes treatment satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with the AA/AG genotype had a higher baseline weight than those with the GG genotype (121.4 kg vs 106.6 kg, respectively; <i>p</i><0.01). No significant difference in achieved HbA1c was found based on A-allele carrier status (0.43 mmol/mol; 95% CI -4.83, 5.69; <i>p</i>=0.87). Among Māori and Pacific participants with the A-allele, a smaller weight difference was observed after pioglitazone vs vildagliptin compared to those with the GG genotype (interaction effect -1.66 kg; 95% CI -3.27, -0.05; <i>p</i>=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>CREBRF</i> rs373863828 A-allele carriers show a similar HbA1c-lowering response to pioglitazone vs vildagliptin compared to non-carriers but exhibit less weight gain with pioglitazone, despite having significantly higher baseline weights.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1255-1262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S500336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: This subgroup analysis of a randomised, open-label, two-period crossover trial in Aotearoa New Zealand (February 2019 to March 2020) assessed whether the glucose-lowering effects of vildagliptin, vs pioglitazone varied by the CREBRF (p.Arg457Gln) rs373863828 genotype.

Methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c > 58 mmol/mol (>7.5%) received either pioglitazone (30 mg) or vildagliptin (50 mg) for 16 weeks, then switched medications for another 16 weeks. Differences in HbA1c between treatments (pioglitazone vs vildagliptin) were tested for an interaction with CREBRF rs373863828 A-allele carrier status and controlling for baseline HbA1c using linear mixed models. Secondary endpoints included weight, systolic blood pressure, and diabetes treatment satisfaction.

Results: Participants with the AA/AG genotype had a higher baseline weight than those with the GG genotype (121.4 kg vs 106.6 kg, respectively; p<0.01). No significant difference in achieved HbA1c was found based on A-allele carrier status (0.43 mmol/mol; 95% CI -4.83, 5.69; p=0.87). Among Māori and Pacific participants with the A-allele, a smaller weight difference was observed after pioglitazone vs vildagliptin compared to those with the GG genotype (interaction effect -1.66 kg; 95% CI -3.27, -0.05; p=0.04).

Conclusion: CREBRF rs373863828 A-allele carriers show a similar HbA1c-lowering response to pioglitazone vs vildagliptin compared to non-carriers but exhibit less weight gain with pioglitazone, despite having significantly higher baseline weights.

CREBRF rs373863828 a等位基因携带者使用吡格列酮与维格列汀减少体重增加:来自WORTH试验的见解
背景/目的:该亚组分析在新西兰奥特罗阿(2019年2月至2020年3月)进行的一项随机、开放标签、两期交叉试验,评估了维格列汀与吡格列酮的降血糖效果是否因CREBRF (p.a g457gln) rs373863828基因型而异。方法:成人2型糖尿病和HbA1c > 58 mmol/mol(>7.5%)接受吡格列酮(30mg)或维格列汀(50mg)治疗16周,然后再切换药物治疗16周。使用线性混合模型检测两种治疗(吡格列酮与维格列汀)之间HbA1c的差异与CREBRF rs373863828 a等位基因携带者状态的相互作用,并控制基线HbA1c。次要终点包括体重、收缩压和糖尿病治疗满意度。结果:AA/AG基因型参与者的基线体重高于GG基因型参与者(分别为121.4 kg和106.6 kg;页= 0.87)。在Māori和携带a等位基因的Pacific参与者中,与GG基因型的参与者相比,吡格列酮与维格列汀治疗后的体重差异较小(相互作用效应-1.66 kg;95% ci -3.27, -0.05;p = 0.04)。结论:与非携带者相比,CREBRF rs373863828 a等位基因携带者对吡格列酮和维格列汀表现出相似的hba1c降低反应,但吡格列酮的体重增加较少,尽管基线体重明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
431
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信