Intensive Sleep Retraining and Total Sleep Deprivation for Treating Chronic Insomnia: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J Le Bouthillier, H Ivers, C M Morin
{"title":"Intensive Sleep Retraining and Total Sleep Deprivation for Treating Chronic Insomnia: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"J Le Bouthillier, H Ivers, C M Morin","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of intensive sleep retraining (ISR) and total sleep deprivation (TSD) against a no-treatment control condition for treating chronic insomnia and examine two potential mechanisms: the resolution of conditioned insomnia and the increase in homeostatic sleep drive produced by sleep deprivation. Thirty-four adults with chronic sleep onset insomnia (with or without sleep maintenance difficulties) were randomised to ISR, TSD, or a control condition. The ISR condition consisted of a 38.5-h period of sleep deprivation, the last 21 h of which included 42 sleep onset trials; the TSD condition consisted of an equivalent 38.5-h sleep deprivation period without any sleep onset trials, and the control condition consisted of one night of habitual sleep in the laboratory. Significant decreases in insomnia severity were observed from pre- to post-treatment in both ISR and TSD, but not in the control condition. A significant reduction in sleep onset latency was observed during the same period for the ISR condition, but not for the TSD or control conditions, with no clinically meaningful change in anxiety or depressive symptoms. Significant decreases in fatigue were also observed for both ISR and TSD conditions during the same period. These results were generally significant at 3 months after treatment. Sleep improvements produced by ISR, and to a lesser extent by TSD, suggest that both the resolution of conditioned insomnia and the increase in homeostatic sleep drive represent important mechanisms responsible for the efficacy of ISR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of intensive sleep retraining (ISR) and total sleep deprivation (TSD) against a no-treatment control condition for treating chronic insomnia and examine two potential mechanisms: the resolution of conditioned insomnia and the increase in homeostatic sleep drive produced by sleep deprivation. Thirty-four adults with chronic sleep onset insomnia (with or without sleep maintenance difficulties) were randomised to ISR, TSD, or a control condition. The ISR condition consisted of a 38.5-h period of sleep deprivation, the last 21 h of which included 42 sleep onset trials; the TSD condition consisted of an equivalent 38.5-h sleep deprivation period without any sleep onset trials, and the control condition consisted of one night of habitual sleep in the laboratory. Significant decreases in insomnia severity were observed from pre- to post-treatment in both ISR and TSD, but not in the control condition. A significant reduction in sleep onset latency was observed during the same period for the ISR condition, but not for the TSD or control conditions, with no clinically meaningful change in anxiety or depressive symptoms. Significant decreases in fatigue were also observed for both ISR and TSD conditions during the same period. These results were generally significant at 3 months after treatment. Sleep improvements produced by ISR, and to a lesser extent by TSD, suggest that both the resolution of conditioned insomnia and the increase in homeostatic sleep drive represent important mechanisms responsible for the efficacy of ISR.

强化睡眠再训练和完全睡眠剥夺治疗慢性失眠:一项随机对照试验。
本研究的目的是比较强化睡眠再训练(ISR)和完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)在无治疗对照条件下治疗慢性失眠的效果,并研究两种潜在的机制:条件性失眠的解决和睡眠剥夺产生的体内平衡睡眠驱动的增加。34名患有慢性睡眠性失眠症的成年人(有或没有睡眠维持困难)被随机分为ISR组、TSD组或对照组。ISR条件包括38.5小时的睡眠剥夺,最后21小时包括42次睡眠发作试验;创伤后应激障碍组包括38.5小时的睡眠剥夺期,没有任何睡眠发作试验,对照组包括在实验室里习惯性睡眠一晚。ISR组和TSD组的失眠严重程度从治疗前到治疗后均有显著降低,但对照组没有。在同一时期,ISR组的睡眠发作潜伏期显著减少,但在TSD或对照组中没有,焦虑或抑郁症状没有临床意义的变化。在同一时期,也观察到ISR和TSD条件下的疲劳显著减少。这些结果通常在治疗后3个月显著。ISR产生的睡眠改善,以及较小程度上由TSD产生的睡眠改善,表明条件性失眠的解决和内稳态睡眠驱动的增加都是ISR疗效的重要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信