Quantifying Added Drag in Swimming With Parachutes: Implications for Resisted Swimming Training.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Vittorio Coloretti, Silvia Fantozzi, Giorgio Gatta, Marco Bonifazi, Paola Zamparo, Matteo Cortesi
{"title":"Quantifying Added Drag in Swimming With Parachutes: Implications for Resisted Swimming Training.","authors":"Vittorio Coloretti, Silvia Fantozzi, Giorgio Gatta, Marco Bonifazi, Paola Zamparo, Matteo Cortesi","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Coloretti, V, Fantozzi, S, Gatta, G, Bonifazi, M, Zamparo, P, and Cortesi, M. Quantifying added drag in swimming with parachutes: implications for resisted swimming training. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e701-e705, 2025-Swimming parachutes are often used during training as resistive equipment, but their added load and the hydrodynamic effects of the swimmer in front have yet to be investigated. This study explores the drag coefficient (k) of 4 commercial parachutes with different sizes under 3 conditions: (a) when towed without a swimmer in front (kpara), (b) pulled by a passive (streamlined) swimmer (kPpara), and (c) pulled by an actively propelling swimmer (kApara). An electromechanical device was used to assess kpara and kPpara as the ratio between towing force and the square of towing velocity during 5 trials at different velocities while kApara was measured based on full-tethered and semi-tethered forces using the residual thrust methods. The values of kpara were as follows: 15.4 ± 0.1, 19.7 ± 0.1, 37.2 ± 0.1, and 73.9 ± 2.8 N·s2·m-2 for parachutes with surfaces of 400, 529, 900, and 1,600 cm2, respectively. Parachute resistance decreased by approximately 21% when pulled by a passive swimmer, whereas it increased by about 15% when pulled by a propelling swimmer. Possible explanations for these differences include drafting and added mass effects. Data reported in this study can assist coaches in quantifying the added load of swimming parachutes during training, by knowing only the parachute size and the swimming velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":"39 5","pages":"e701-e705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Coloretti, V, Fantozzi, S, Gatta, G, Bonifazi, M, Zamparo, P, and Cortesi, M. Quantifying added drag in swimming with parachutes: implications for resisted swimming training. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e701-e705, 2025-Swimming parachutes are often used during training as resistive equipment, but their added load and the hydrodynamic effects of the swimmer in front have yet to be investigated. This study explores the drag coefficient (k) of 4 commercial parachutes with different sizes under 3 conditions: (a) when towed without a swimmer in front (kpara), (b) pulled by a passive (streamlined) swimmer (kPpara), and (c) pulled by an actively propelling swimmer (kApara). An electromechanical device was used to assess kpara and kPpara as the ratio between towing force and the square of towing velocity during 5 trials at different velocities while kApara was measured based on full-tethered and semi-tethered forces using the residual thrust methods. The values of kpara were as follows: 15.4 ± 0.1, 19.7 ± 0.1, 37.2 ± 0.1, and 73.9 ± 2.8 N·s2·m-2 for parachutes with surfaces of 400, 529, 900, and 1,600 cm2, respectively. Parachute resistance decreased by approximately 21% when pulled by a passive swimmer, whereas it increased by about 15% when pulled by a propelling swimmer. Possible explanations for these differences include drafting and added mass effects. Data reported in this study can assist coaches in quantifying the added load of swimming parachutes during training, by knowing only the parachute size and the swimming velocity.

量化降落伞游泳中的附加阻力:对阻力游泳训练的启示。
摘要:Coloretti, V, Fantozzi, S, Gatta, G, Bonifazi, M, Zamparo, P, and Cortesi, M.量化降落伞游泳中的附加阻力:对阻力游泳训练的影响。[J][强度与控制]39(5):e701-e705, 2025-游泳降落伞在训练中经常被用作阻力设备,但它们的附加载荷和前面游泳者的水动力效应尚未被研究。本研究探讨了4种不同尺寸的商用降落伞在3种情况下的阻力系数(k): (a)在没有游泳者牵引的情况下(kpara), (b)在被动(流线型)游泳者牵引的情况(kPpara), (c)在主动推进的情况下(kApara)。在5次试验中,采用机电装置评估拖曳力与拖曳速度的平方之比为kpara和kPpara,采用剩余推力法测量基于全系绳力和半系绳力的kApara。400、529、900、1600 cm2降落伞的kpara值分别为15.4±0.1、19.7±0.1、37.2±0.1、73.9±2.8 N·s2·m-2。在被动游泳者的拉动下,降落伞阻力下降了约21%,而在推进游泳者的拉动下,降落伞阻力增加了约15%。对这些差异的可能解释包括起草和附加质量效应。本研究报告的数据可以帮助教练在只知道降落伞尺寸和游泳速度的情况下,量化游泳降落伞在训练过程中的附加负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信