{"title":"Comperative analysis of three chatbot responses on pediatric primary nocturnal enuresis.","authors":"Asya Eylem Boztas, Esra Ensari","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.04.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate both the accuracy and reproducibility of the answers given by ChatGPT-4o®, Gemini® and Copilot® to frequently asked questions about pediatric primary enuresis nocturna.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty frequently asked questions about primary nocturnal enuresis were asked 2 times, one week apart, on ChatGPT-4o, Gemini and Copilot. One of each pediatric surgeon and nephrologist independently scored the answers into 4 groups: comprehensive/correct (1), incomplete/partially correct (2), a mix of accurate and inaccurate/misleading (3), and completely inaccurate/irrelevant (4). The accuracy and reproducibility of each chatbots answers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison of these most common used chatbots, the order of completely correct response rates from highest to lowest was Chat GPT-4o and followed by Copilot and Gemini. With an accuracy percentage of 92.5 %, ChatGPT-4o gave the most accurate responses of any AI chatbot. Gemini answered 50 % of questions correctly. Copilot was the weakest successful chatbot in answering questions about enuresis nocturna with 45 % of completely accurate answer ratio. Besides Copilot has a ratio of 2.5 % for completely inaccurate/irrelevant response. Reproducibility of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini and Copilots were 85 %, 77.5 %, 70 % respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4o is more successful in providing a high percentage of accurate responses regarding nocturnal enuresis. Both patients and their parents can use it, especially for simple, low-complexity medical questions. However, it should be used alongside expert healthcare proffesional.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.04.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate both the accuracy and reproducibility of the answers given by ChatGPT-4o®, Gemini® and Copilot® to frequently asked questions about pediatric primary enuresis nocturna.
Methods: Forty frequently asked questions about primary nocturnal enuresis were asked 2 times, one week apart, on ChatGPT-4o, Gemini and Copilot. One of each pediatric surgeon and nephrologist independently scored the answers into 4 groups: comprehensive/correct (1), incomplete/partially correct (2), a mix of accurate and inaccurate/misleading (3), and completely inaccurate/irrelevant (4). The accuracy and reproducibility of each chatbots answers were evaluated.
Results: In comparison of these most common used chatbots, the order of completely correct response rates from highest to lowest was Chat GPT-4o and followed by Copilot and Gemini. With an accuracy percentage of 92.5 %, ChatGPT-4o gave the most accurate responses of any AI chatbot. Gemini answered 50 % of questions correctly. Copilot was the weakest successful chatbot in answering questions about enuresis nocturna with 45 % of completely accurate answer ratio. Besides Copilot has a ratio of 2.5 % for completely inaccurate/irrelevant response. Reproducibility of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini and Copilots were 85 %, 77.5 %, 70 % respectively.
Conclusion: ChatGPT-4o is more successful in providing a high percentage of accurate responses regarding nocturnal enuresis. Both patients and their parents can use it, especially for simple, low-complexity medical questions. However, it should be used alongside expert healthcare proffesional.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review.
It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty.
It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals.
It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty.
It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.