Intracranial response to positive end-expiratory pressure is influenced by lung recruitability and gas distribution during mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury patients: a proof-of-concept physiological study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Reka Bencze, Rafael Kawati, Anders Hånell, Anders Lewen, Per Enblad, Henrik Engquist, Kristin Jona Bjarnadottir, Odin Joensen, Annelie Barrueta Tenhunen, Filip Freden, Laurent Brochard, Gaetano Perchiazzi, Mariangela Pellegrini
{"title":"Intracranial response to positive end-expiratory pressure is influenced by lung recruitability and gas distribution during mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury patients: a proof-of-concept physiological study.","authors":"Reka Bencze, Rafael Kawati, Anders Hånell, Anders Lewen, Per Enblad, Henrik Engquist, Kristin Jona Bjarnadottir, Odin Joensen, Annelie Barrueta Tenhunen, Filip Freden, Laurent Brochard, Gaetano Perchiazzi, Mariangela Pellegrini","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00750-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) remains controversial. PEEP can benefit oxygenation by promoting alveolar recruitment, but its influence on ICP is complex. The primary aims of this study were to investigate 1) how lung recruitability influences oxygenation and 2) how lung recruitability and regional gas distribution, measured via recruitment-to-inflation (RI) ratio and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), affect ICP in response to PEEP changes in critically ill patients in their early phase of ABI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten mechanically ventilated ABI patients were included. Pressure reactivity index (PRx) was estimated. Using RI manoeuvre and EIT, lung recruitability and gas distribution were assessed in response to a standardised PEEP change (from high to low levels, with a delta of 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Changes in ICP (ΔICP) were calculated between high and low PEEP. Lung inhomogeneity indices (global inhomogeneity index [GI] and local inhomogeneity index [LI]) were derived from EIT. Correlations between ventilatory variables and ICP were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood oxygenation significantly decreased, going from high (14 [IQR: 12-15] cmH₂O) to low (4 [IQR: 2-5] cmH₂O) PEEP. Reducing PEEP significantly increased ICP (from 9 [IQR: 5-13] to 12 [IQR: 8-16] mmHg, p < 0.01), while cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) improved (from 71 [IQR:67-83] to 75 [IQR: 70-84] mmHg, p = 0.03) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased (from 79 [IQR: 69-95] to 84 [IQR: 76-99] mmHg, p < 0.01). The RI ratio correlated significantly with ΔICP (rho = 0.87, p < 0.01), as did Vrec% (proportion of recruited volume, rho = 0.65) and GI (rho = 0.5). LI did not correlate with ΔICP. PRx was 0.30 [IQR: 0.12-0.42], indicating a deranged cerebral autoregulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a higher potential for lung recruitability had a more beneficial effect of PEEP on oxygenation. These effects should be interpreted cautiously, given that lung recruitability and global inhomogeneity of gas distribution significantly influenced the intracranial response to PEEP in ABI patients. As indicated by MAP and CPP, PEEP may impact systemic haemodynamics and cerebral perfusion when cerebral autoregulation is deranged. These findings underscore the importance of multimodal (i.e. respiratory, cerebral and haemodynamics) monitoring for optimising ventilation strategies in ABI patients and provide a framework for future research. Trial registration Registration number: NCT05363085, Date of registration: May 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00750-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) remains controversial. PEEP can benefit oxygenation by promoting alveolar recruitment, but its influence on ICP is complex. The primary aims of this study were to investigate 1) how lung recruitability influences oxygenation and 2) how lung recruitability and regional gas distribution, measured via recruitment-to-inflation (RI) ratio and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), affect ICP in response to PEEP changes in critically ill patients in their early phase of ABI.

Methods: Ten mechanically ventilated ABI patients were included. Pressure reactivity index (PRx) was estimated. Using RI manoeuvre and EIT, lung recruitability and gas distribution were assessed in response to a standardised PEEP change (from high to low levels, with a delta of 10 cmH2O). Changes in ICP (ΔICP) were calculated between high and low PEEP. Lung inhomogeneity indices (global inhomogeneity index [GI] and local inhomogeneity index [LI]) were derived from EIT. Correlations between ventilatory variables and ICP were analysed.

Results: Blood oxygenation significantly decreased, going from high (14 [IQR: 12-15] cmH₂O) to low (4 [IQR: 2-5] cmH₂O) PEEP. Reducing PEEP significantly increased ICP (from 9 [IQR: 5-13] to 12 [IQR: 8-16] mmHg, p < 0.01), while cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) improved (from 71 [IQR:67-83] to 75 [IQR: 70-84] mmHg, p = 0.03) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased (from 79 [IQR: 69-95] to 84 [IQR: 76-99] mmHg, p < 0.01). The RI ratio correlated significantly with ΔICP (rho = 0.87, p < 0.01), as did Vrec% (proportion of recruited volume, rho = 0.65) and GI (rho = 0.5). LI did not correlate with ΔICP. PRx was 0.30 [IQR: 0.12-0.42], indicating a deranged cerebral autoregulation.

Conclusions: Patients with a higher potential for lung recruitability had a more beneficial effect of PEEP on oxygenation. These effects should be interpreted cautiously, given that lung recruitability and global inhomogeneity of gas distribution significantly influenced the intracranial response to PEEP in ABI patients. As indicated by MAP and CPP, PEEP may impact systemic haemodynamics and cerebral perfusion when cerebral autoregulation is deranged. These findings underscore the importance of multimodal (i.e. respiratory, cerebral and haemodynamics) monitoring for optimising ventilation strategies in ABI patients and provide a framework for future research. Trial registration Registration number: NCT05363085, Date of registration: May 2022.

急性脑损伤患者机械通气期间肺恢复能力和气体分布对呼气末正压的颅内反应的影响:一项概念验证生理学研究。
背景:呼气末正压(PEEP)对急性脑损伤(ABI)患者颅内压(ICP)动态的影响仍有争议。PEEP可以通过促进肺泡复吸来促进氧合,但其对颅内压的影响是复杂的。本研究的主要目的是探讨1)肺再生能力如何影响氧合;2)肺再生能力和区域气体分布(通过再生-充气(RI)比和电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)测量)如何影响急性ABI早期危重患者对PEEP变化的ICP响应。方法:纳入10例机械通气ABI患者。估算压力反应性指数(PRx)。使用RI操作和EIT,根据标准化PEEP变化(从高到低水平,δ值为10 cmH2O)评估肺恢复能力和气体分布。计算高PEEP和低PEEP之间ICP的变化(ΔICP)。肺不均匀性指数(全局不均匀性指数[GI]和局部不均匀性指数[LI])由EIT导出。分析了通气变量与ICP的相关性。结果:血氧合明显降低,PEEP由高(14 [IQR: 12-15] cmH₂O)降至低(4 [IQR: 2-5] cmH₂O)。降低PEEP可显著增加颅内压(从9 [IQR: 5-13]增加到12 [IQR: 8-16] mmHg, p)。结论:肺恢复潜力越高的患者,PEEP对氧合的影响越有利。考虑到ABI患者的肺部招募能力和气体分布的整体不均匀性显著影响了PEEP的颅内反应,这些影响应谨慎解释。MAP和CPP显示,当大脑自我调节紊乱时,正压可影响全身血流动力学和脑灌注。这些发现强调了多模式(即呼吸、脑和血流动力学)监测对于优化ABI患者通气策略的重要性,并为未来的研究提供了框架。试验报名注册号:NCT05363085,报名日期:2022年5月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信