The paradoxical relationship of sensorimotor deficit and lesion volume in acute ischemic stroke.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Réka Tóth, Nikoletta Szabó, Anna Törteli, Noémi Kovács, Ildikó Horváth, Krisztián Szigeti, Domokos Máthé, Tamás Zs Kincses, Ákos Menyhárt, Eszter Farkas
{"title":"The paradoxical relationship of sensorimotor deficit and lesion volume in acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Réka Tóth, Nikoletta Szabó, Anna Törteli, Noémi Kovács, Ildikó Horváth, Krisztián Szigeti, Domokos Máthé, Tamás Zs Kincses, Ákos Menyhárt, Eszter Farkas","doi":"10.1093/jnen/nlaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the relationship between the degree of neurological deficit and lesion volume is key to predicting outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Over the past 40 years, AIS research has relied on a perceived linear relationship between lesion volumes and neurological deficit. Here, we found that these variables do not show a relationship in a mouse model of AIS. Acute ischemic stroke was induced by transient (60 minutes) intraluminal microfilament occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in 15 male isoflurane (0.8%-1%)-anesthetized mice. Acute ischemic stroke-induced sensorimotor deficits were assessed daily for 72 hours using the Garcia Neuroscore Scale (GNS). Lesion size was estimated 72 hours after AIS using a rodent MRI system. Lesion sizes ranged from 17 to 130 mm3. In 3/15 mice (atypical cases: lesion <30 mm3 and GNS <11), small infarcts (14.6 ± 6.2 vs 51.7 ± 19.9 mm3, atypical vs typical) were associated with low GNS values at 72 hours (9 ± 2 vs 11 ± 2 pts; atypical vs typical). Consequently, we found no relationship between lesion size and GNS in this AIS model (R = 0.058). These results suggest that lesion size is not a reliable predictor of neurological outcome in AIS models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlaf046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between the degree of neurological deficit and lesion volume is key to predicting outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Over the past 40 years, AIS research has relied on a perceived linear relationship between lesion volumes and neurological deficit. Here, we found that these variables do not show a relationship in a mouse model of AIS. Acute ischemic stroke was induced by transient (60 minutes) intraluminal microfilament occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in 15 male isoflurane (0.8%-1%)-anesthetized mice. Acute ischemic stroke-induced sensorimotor deficits were assessed daily for 72 hours using the Garcia Neuroscore Scale (GNS). Lesion size was estimated 72 hours after AIS using a rodent MRI system. Lesion sizes ranged from 17 to 130 mm3. In 3/15 mice (atypical cases: lesion <30 mm3 and GNS <11), small infarcts (14.6 ± 6.2 vs 51.7 ± 19.9 mm3, atypical vs typical) were associated with low GNS values at 72 hours (9 ± 2 vs 11 ± 2 pts; atypical vs typical). Consequently, we found no relationship between lesion size and GNS in this AIS model (R = 0.058). These results suggest that lesion size is not a reliable predictor of neurological outcome in AIS models.

急性缺血性脑卒中感觉运动障碍与病变体积的矛盾关系。
了解神经功能缺损程度与病变体积之间的关系是预测急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者预后的关键。在过去的40年里,AIS研究一直依赖于病变体积和神经功能缺陷之间的线性关系。在这里,我们发现这些变量在AIS小鼠模型中没有显示出关系。用异氟醚(0.8% ~ 1%)麻醉的15只雄性小鼠,经短暂性(60分钟)腔内微丝闭塞大脑中动脉诱导急性缺血性卒中。使用加西亚神经评分量表(GNS)每天评估急性缺血性卒中引起的感觉运动缺陷,持续72小时。使用啮齿动物MRI系统估计AIS后72小时的病变大小。病灶大小为17 ~ 130 mm3。3/15小鼠(非典型病例:病变)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology is the official journal of the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. (AANP). The journal publishes peer-reviewed studies on neuropathology and experimental neuroscience, book reviews, letters, and Association news, covering a broad spectrum of fields in basic neuroscience with an emphasis on human neurological diseases. It is written by and for neuropathologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, pathologists, psychiatrists, and basic neuroscientists from around the world. Publication has been continuous since 1942.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信