Mode of action approach supports a lack of carcinogenic potential of six organic UV filters.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2025.2462642
Samuel M Cohen, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, Gary M Eichenbaum, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash
{"title":"Mode of action approach supports a lack of carcinogenic potential of six organic UV filters.","authors":"Samuel M Cohen, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, Gary M Eichenbaum, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2462642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultraviolet (UV) filters, the active ingredients in sunscreens, have been used for several decades to reduce the risk of acute and chronic damage to the skin from solar UV radiation, which can lead to skin cancer. Based on recent clinical studies showing that certain UV filters are absorbed systemically at low levels in humans, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested supplementing existing safety data with preclinical studies including oral and dermal 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies. Although the conduct of 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies has been the standard approach for evaluating the carcinogenic potential of chemicals and new drugs for approximately 6 decades, there are multiple examples showing that such studies are not predictive of human cancer risk. Given these concerns with 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies, we have developed and applied an alternative approach for supplementing existing data related to carcinogenic potential for six of the most commonly used UV filters in sunscreen products (i.e. avobenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, octinoxate, octisalate, and octocrylene). This approach evaluates their mode of action (MOA) based on <i>in vivo</i>, <i>in vitro</i>, and <i>in silico</i> data combined with an assessment of exposure margins. This approach is based on the substantial progress in understanding the MOAs that are responsible for tumor induction in humans. It is consistent with those being developed by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) and other health authorities to replace 2-year carcinogenicity studies given their limitations and questionable biological relevance to humans. The available data for the six UV filters show that they are not genotoxic and show no evidence of biologically relevant carcinogenic MOAs. Furthermore, their systemic exposure levels in humans fall well below concentrations at which they have biologic activity. In conclusion, these data support the continued safe use of these six filters in sunscreen products.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":"55 2","pages":"248-284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2025.2462642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) filters, the active ingredients in sunscreens, have been used for several decades to reduce the risk of acute and chronic damage to the skin from solar UV radiation, which can lead to skin cancer. Based on recent clinical studies showing that certain UV filters are absorbed systemically at low levels in humans, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested supplementing existing safety data with preclinical studies including oral and dermal 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies. Although the conduct of 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies has been the standard approach for evaluating the carcinogenic potential of chemicals and new drugs for approximately 6 decades, there are multiple examples showing that such studies are not predictive of human cancer risk. Given these concerns with 2-year rodent carcinogenicity studies, we have developed and applied an alternative approach for supplementing existing data related to carcinogenic potential for six of the most commonly used UV filters in sunscreen products (i.e. avobenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, octinoxate, octisalate, and octocrylene). This approach evaluates their mode of action (MOA) based on in vivo, in vitro, and in silico data combined with an assessment of exposure margins. This approach is based on the substantial progress in understanding the MOAs that are responsible for tumor induction in humans. It is consistent with those being developed by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) and other health authorities to replace 2-year carcinogenicity studies given their limitations and questionable biological relevance to humans. The available data for the six UV filters show that they are not genotoxic and show no evidence of biologically relevant carcinogenic MOAs. Furthermore, their systemic exposure levels in humans fall well below concentrations at which they have biologic activity. In conclusion, these data support the continued safe use of these six filters in sunscreen products.

作用方式方法支持六种有机紫外线过滤器没有致癌潜力。
紫外线(UV)过滤器,防晒霜中的活性成分,已经被使用了几十年,以减少太阳紫外线辐射对皮肤造成急性和慢性损伤的风险,而太阳紫外线辐射可能导致皮肤癌。根据最近的临床研究表明,某些紫外线过滤器在人体中以低水平被系统吸收,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)要求通过临床前研究补充现有的安全性数据,包括口服和皮肤2年的啮齿动物致癌性研究。虽然进行为期2年的啮齿动物致癌性研究已成为评估化学品和新药致癌潜力的标准方法,但有多个例子表明,此类研究并不能预测人类癌症风险。考虑到这些对2年啮齿动物致癌性研究的担忧,我们开发并应用了一种替代方法,以补充防晒产品中六种最常用的紫外线滤光剂(即阿伏苯宗、恩舒利唑、同盐酸盐、辛酸盐、辛酸盐和八烯)的致癌潜力相关的现有数据。该方法基于体内、体外和计算机数据,结合暴露量评估来评估它们的作用模式(MOA)。这种方法是基于对人类肿瘤诱导的moa的理解取得了实质性进展。它与国际协调理事会(ICH)和其他卫生当局正在制定的那些研究相一致,这些研究旨在取代为期2年的致癌性研究,因为这些研究存在局限性,而且与人类的生物学相关性值得怀疑。六种紫外线过滤器的现有数据表明,它们没有遗传毒性,也没有证据表明存在与生物学相关的致癌MOAs。此外,它们在人体中的全身暴露水平远低于它们具有生物活性的浓度。总之,这些数据支持在防晒霜产品中继续安全使用这六种过滤器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信