Machine Learning Model for Predicting Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17346-1
Yubing Zhang, Qikun Guo, Shurong Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Fangzheng Xiang, Wenhui Su, Yukun Wu, Jiajie Yu, Yun Xie, Cheng Luo, Fufu Zheng
{"title":"Machine Learning Model for Predicting Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yubing Zhang, Qikun Guo, Shurong Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Fangzheng Xiang, Wenhui Su, Yukun Wu, Jiajie Yu, Yun Xie, Cheng Luo, Fufu Zheng","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17346-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to preoperatively predict surgical difficulty for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) using clinical and radiomic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 212 patients with pathologically confirmed PPGLs were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training (n = 148) and validation cohorts (n = 64). Seven ML models (Classification and Regression Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting) were trained using clinical parameters alone or combined with radiomics. Model performance was evaluated and compared through accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Through comprehensive assessment, the optimal integrated model (clinical + radiomics) was identified and its predictive efficacy was subsequently compared with that of the clinical parameter model. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to enhance the interpretability of the optimal model by visualizing feature contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all integrated models, the SVM model exhibited the most prominent performance, achieving AUC values of 0.96 in the training cohort and 0.85 in the validation cohort, while demonstrating statistically significant superiority over the clinical parameter model (p < 0.05). The SHAP analysis revealed that radiomic signature (Rad score) exerted the most substantial influence on the predictive outcomes, with age, body mass index, maximum tumor diameter, and preoperative heart rate also demonstrating statistically significant contributions to the model predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVM model integrating clinical and radiomic features effectively predicts PPGL surgical difficulty, aiding preoperative risk stratification and personalized surgical planning to reduce operative risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4790-4803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17346-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to preoperatively predict surgical difficulty for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) using clinical and radiomic features.

Methods: In this study, 212 patients with pathologically confirmed PPGLs were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training (n = 148) and validation cohorts (n = 64). Seven ML models (Classification and Regression Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting) were trained using clinical parameters alone or combined with radiomics. Model performance was evaluated and compared through accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Through comprehensive assessment, the optimal integrated model (clinical + radiomics) was identified and its predictive efficacy was subsequently compared with that of the clinical parameter model. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to enhance the interpretability of the optimal model by visualizing feature contributions.

Results: Among all integrated models, the SVM model exhibited the most prominent performance, achieving AUC values of 0.96 in the training cohort and 0.85 in the validation cohort, while demonstrating statistically significant superiority over the clinical parameter model (p < 0.05). The SHAP analysis revealed that radiomic signature (Rad score) exerted the most substantial influence on the predictive outcomes, with age, body mass index, maximum tumor diameter, and preoperative heart rate also demonstrating statistically significant contributions to the model predictions.

Conclusion: The SVM model integrating clinical and radiomic features effectively predicts PPGL surgical difficulty, aiding preoperative risk stratification and personalized surgical planning to reduce operative risks.

预测嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤手术难度的机器学习模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:我们旨在开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,利用临床和放射学特征预测嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤(PPGLs)的术前手术难度。方法:回顾性纳入212例经病理证实的PPGLs患者,分为训练组(n = 148)和验证组(n = 64)。7个ML模型(分类和回归树、k近邻、最小绝对收缩和选择算子、Naïve贝叶斯、随机森林、支持向量机(SVM)和极端梯度增强)单独或结合放射组学训练。通过准确性、敏感性、特异性、F1评分、曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析对模型性能进行评价和比较。通过综合评估,确定最佳的综合模型(临床+放射组学),并将其预测效果与临床参数模型进行比较。最后,应用SHapley加性解释(SHAP),通过特征贡献的可视化来增强最优模型的可解释性。结果:在所有综合模型中,SVM模型表现最为突出,在训练组和验证组的AUC值分别为0.96和0.85,优于临床参数模型(p)。结论:综合临床和放射学特征的SVM模型能有效预测PPGL手术难度,有助于术前风险分层和个性化手术计划,降低手术风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信