Evaluation of Free-breathing, non-ECG triggered Magnetic Resonance T1 mapping derived from multitasking imaging at 3.0 T in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shiya Wang, Jingjing Xu, Yiying Hua, Yaqiong Wang, Hongfei Lu, Yi Sun, Jiajun Guo, Jiaqi She, Meiying Ge, Mengsu Zeng, Yinyin Chen, Hang Jin
{"title":"Evaluation of Free-breathing, non-ECG triggered Magnetic Resonance T1 mapping derived from multitasking imaging at 3.0 T in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Shiya Wang, Jingjing Xu, Yiying Hua, Yaqiong Wang, Hongfei Lu, Yi Sun, Jiajun Guo, Jiaqi She, Meiying Ge, Mengsu Zeng, Yinyin Chen, Hang Jin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the image quality of the free-breathing, non-ECG-Multitasking T1 mapping and to compare T1 values, lesion area and ROC curve with those derived from the traditional MOLLI sequence in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vitro, T1 values from CMR Multitasking and MOLLI images were compared in 4 phantoms. In vivo studies included 108 patients (38 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 70 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and 31 healthy volunteers. All underwent mid-ventricular short-axis CMR Multitasking(free-breathing) and MOLLI (breath-held). Image quality was scored (4-point scale). T1 values and lesion areas were compared via linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and ROC curves (LGE as reference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phantom T1 values showed excellent agreement (Multitasking v.s. reference: R2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). In vivo, Multitasking strongly correlated with MOLLI for native T1 in healthy subjects (R2 = 0.69), ischemic (R2 = 0.71), and nonischaemic groups (R2 = 0.81, all P < 0.001). Multitasking demonstrated superior image quality in patients with breath-holding difficulties and adverse heart rates P < 0.001). MOLLI image quality declined with breath-holding difficulties, arrhythmia, and high BMI (P < 0.05); Multitasking was less affected but still impacted by BMI (P < 0.05). Lesion areas showed no inter-sequence differences (P > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed comparable diagnostic accuracy between sequences in stable patients (P > 0.05), but superior Multitasking performance in breath-holding difficulties and arrhythmia subgroups (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multitasking provides accurate T1 quantification and lesion delineation in cardiomyopathy, with enhanced robustness for patients with poor breath-holding or arrhythmia. BMI-related limitations warrant technical refinement.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge:: </strong>Free-breathing, non-ECG CMR Multitasking achieves accurate T1 mapping in ischaemic/non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, overcoming ECG/respiratory limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the image quality of the free-breathing, non-ECG-Multitasking T1 mapping and to compare T1 values, lesion area and ROC curve with those derived from the traditional MOLLI sequence in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods: In vitro, T1 values from CMR Multitasking and MOLLI images were compared in 4 phantoms. In vivo studies included 108 patients (38 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 70 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and 31 healthy volunteers. All underwent mid-ventricular short-axis CMR Multitasking(free-breathing) and MOLLI (breath-held). Image quality was scored (4-point scale). T1 values and lesion areas were compared via linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and ROC curves (LGE as reference).

Results: Phantom T1 values showed excellent agreement (Multitasking v.s. reference: R2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). In vivo, Multitasking strongly correlated with MOLLI for native T1 in healthy subjects (R2 = 0.69), ischemic (R2 = 0.71), and nonischaemic groups (R2 = 0.81, all P < 0.001). Multitasking demonstrated superior image quality in patients with breath-holding difficulties and adverse heart rates P < 0.001). MOLLI image quality declined with breath-holding difficulties, arrhythmia, and high BMI (P < 0.05); Multitasking was less affected but still impacted by BMI (P < 0.05). Lesion areas showed no inter-sequence differences (P > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed comparable diagnostic accuracy between sequences in stable patients (P > 0.05), but superior Multitasking performance in breath-holding difficulties and arrhythmia subgroups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Multitasking provides accurate T1 quantification and lesion delineation in cardiomyopathy, with enhanced robustness for patients with poor breath-holding or arrhythmia. BMI-related limitations warrant technical refinement.

Advances in knowledge:: Free-breathing, non-ECG CMR Multitasking achieves accurate T1 mapping in ischaemic/non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, overcoming ECG/respiratory limitation.

对缺血性和非缺血性心肌病患者3.0 T时多任务成像得出的自由呼吸、非ecg触发的磁共振T1定位的评价
目的:评价自由呼吸、非ecg多任务T1成像的图像质量,并与传统MOLLI序列在缺血性和非缺血性心肌病中的T1值、病变面积和ROC曲线进行比较。方法:比较4个幻影CMR多任务图像和MOLLI图像的T1值。体内研究包括108例患者(缺血性心肌病38例,非缺血性心肌病70例)和31名健康志愿者。所有患者均进行了中心室短轴CMR多任务(自由呼吸)和MOLLI(屏气)。对图像质量进行评分(4分制)。通过线性回归、Bland-Altman分析和ROC曲线(LGE为参考)比较T1值和病变面积。结果:幻影T1值具有良好的一致性(多任务与参考:R2 = 0.99, p0.05)。ROC分析显示,稳定患者的序列诊断准确性相当(P < 0.05),但多任务处理在屏气困难和心律失常亚组中的表现更佳(P结论:多任务处理在心肌病中提供了准确的T1量化和病变描绘,对屏气困难或心律失常患者的稳健性增强。bmi相关的限制需要技术改进。自由呼吸、非ECG CMR多任务处理在缺血性/非缺血性心肌病中实现了精确的T1映射,克服了ECG/呼吸限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信