Evaluation of Free-breathing, non-ECG triggered Magnetic Resonance T1 mapping derived from multitasking imaging at 3.0 T in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
IF 1.8 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shiya Wang, Jingjing Xu, Yiying Hua, Yaqiong Wang, Hongfei Lu, Yi Sun, Jiajun Guo, Jiaqi She, Meiying Ge, Mengsu Zeng, Yinyin Chen, Hang Jin
{"title":"Evaluation of Free-breathing, non-ECG triggered Magnetic Resonance T1 mapping derived from multitasking imaging at 3.0 T in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Shiya Wang, Jingjing Xu, Yiying Hua, Yaqiong Wang, Hongfei Lu, Yi Sun, Jiajun Guo, Jiaqi She, Meiying Ge, Mengsu Zeng, Yinyin Chen, Hang Jin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the image quality of the free-breathing, non-ECG-Multitasking T1 mapping and to compare T1 values, lesion area and ROC curve with those derived from the traditional MOLLI sequence in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In vitro, T1 values from CMR Multitasking and MOLLI images were compared in 4 phantoms. In vivo studies included 108 patients (38 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 70 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and 31 healthy volunteers. All underwent mid-ventricular short-axis CMR Multitasking(free-breathing) and MOLLI (breath-held). Image quality was scored (4-point scale). T1 values and lesion areas were compared via linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and ROC curves (LGE as reference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phantom T1 values showed excellent agreement (Multitasking v.s. reference: R2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). In vivo, Multitasking strongly correlated with MOLLI for native T1 in healthy subjects (R2 = 0.69), ischemic (R2 = 0.71), and nonischaemic groups (R2 = 0.81, all P < 0.001). Multitasking demonstrated superior image quality in patients with breath-holding difficulties and adverse heart rates P < 0.001). MOLLI image quality declined with breath-holding difficulties, arrhythmia, and high BMI (P < 0.05); Multitasking was less affected but still impacted by BMI (P < 0.05). Lesion areas showed no inter-sequence differences (P > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed comparable diagnostic accuracy between sequences in stable patients (P > 0.05), but superior Multitasking performance in breath-holding difficulties and arrhythmia subgroups (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multitasking provides accurate T1 quantification and lesion delineation in cardiomyopathy, with enhanced robustness for patients with poor breath-holding or arrhythmia. BMI-related limitations warrant technical refinement.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge:: </strong>Free-breathing, non-ECG CMR Multitasking achieves accurate T1 mapping in ischaemic/non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, overcoming ECG/respiratory limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the image quality of the free-breathing, non-ECG-Multitasking T1 mapping and to compare T1 values, lesion area and ROC curve with those derived from the traditional MOLLI sequence in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Methods: In vitro, T1 values from CMR Multitasking and MOLLI images were compared in 4 phantoms. In vivo studies included 108 patients (38 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 70 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and 31 healthy volunteers. All underwent mid-ventricular short-axis CMR Multitasking(free-breathing) and MOLLI (breath-held). Image quality was scored (4-point scale). T1 values and lesion areas were compared via linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and ROC curves (LGE as reference).
Results: Phantom T1 values showed excellent agreement (Multitasking v.s. reference: R2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). In vivo, Multitasking strongly correlated with MOLLI for native T1 in healthy subjects (R2 = 0.69), ischemic (R2 = 0.71), and nonischaemic groups (R2 = 0.81, all P < 0.001). Multitasking demonstrated superior image quality in patients with breath-holding difficulties and adverse heart rates P < 0.001). MOLLI image quality declined with breath-holding difficulties, arrhythmia, and high BMI (P < 0.05); Multitasking was less affected but still impacted by BMI (P < 0.05). Lesion areas showed no inter-sequence differences (P > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed comparable diagnostic accuracy between sequences in stable patients (P > 0.05), but superior Multitasking performance in breath-holding difficulties and arrhythmia subgroups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Multitasking provides accurate T1 quantification and lesion delineation in cardiomyopathy, with enhanced robustness for patients with poor breath-holding or arrhythmia. BMI-related limitations warrant technical refinement.
Advances in knowledge:: Free-breathing, non-ECG CMR Multitasking achieves accurate T1 mapping in ischaemic/non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, overcoming ECG/respiratory limitation.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option