Rebecca L Guy, Katie L Hopkins, Emma L Budd, Kate Wilson, Holly Fountain, Danièle Meunier, Rachel Pike, Sarah M Gerver, Roshina Gnanadurai, Colin S Brown, Susan Hopkins, Berit Muller-Pebody
{"title":"The importance of monitoring a new antibiotic: ceftazidime/avibactam usage and resistance experience from England, 2016 to 2020.","authors":"Rebecca L Guy, Katie L Hopkins, Emma L Budd, Kate Wilson, Holly Fountain, Danièle Meunier, Rachel Pike, Sarah M Gerver, Roshina Gnanadurai, Colin S Brown, Susan Hopkins, Berit Muller-Pebody","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.14.2400399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCeftazidime/avibactam, launched in the United Kingdom (UK) in March 2017, is an antibiotic against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. It was selected for the government's subscription model pilot, for incentivising new antibiotic development, which began in December 2020.AimAhead of the pilot, we assessed ceftazidime/avibactam testing, resistance (2016-2020) and usage (2017-2020) levels in England, as baselines for future surveillance.MethodsFrom routine surveillance samples, we retrieved reported ceftazidime/avibactam resistance categorisation. From reference laboratory samples, we reviewed minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) and molecular data. Among surveillance samples, per cent resistance was estimated. Referred samples' MICs, by carbapenemase gene presence, were investigated. Ceftazidime/avibactam hospital use was measured in defined daily doses (DDDs).ResultsOverall, 6.3% (4,200/66,914; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 6.1-6.4%) of surveillance-reported ceftazidime/avibactam-tested Gram-negative bacteria were resistant. Percentage resistance per bacterial species varied over time, somewhat stabilising as testing was established, with between April 2019 and March 2020, 1.3% <i>Escherichia coli</i> (288/22,736; 95%CI: 1.1-1.4%), 12.6% <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (690/5,495; 95%CI: 11.7-13.5%) and 6.1% of <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (314/5,179; 95%CI: 5.4-6.7%) being resistant. For 8,437 referred Enterobacterales, MIC determination found 11.5% (968/8,437; 95%CI: 10.8-12.2%) resistant. Among resistant isolates, 89.3% (864/968; 95%CI: 87.1-91.1%) had metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes. Of 908 MBL-negative isolates, producing ≥ 1 non-metallo-carbapenemase(s), 2.1% (19/908; 95%CI: 1.3-3.2%) were resistant. Since March 2017, 69.5% (105/151) of English National Health Service Trusts used ceftazidime/avibactam. Monthly usage progressed from 21 to 744 DDDs in March 2020.ConclusionFor appropriate treatment, carbapenemase gene detection and variant identification in ceftazidime/avibactam surveillance matters. Detecting emerging resistant pathogens and preventing spread within healthcare settings requires vigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"30 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.14.2400399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundCeftazidime/avibactam, launched in the United Kingdom (UK) in March 2017, is an antibiotic against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. It was selected for the government's subscription model pilot, for incentivising new antibiotic development, which began in December 2020.AimAhead of the pilot, we assessed ceftazidime/avibactam testing, resistance (2016-2020) and usage (2017-2020) levels in England, as baselines for future surveillance.MethodsFrom routine surveillance samples, we retrieved reported ceftazidime/avibactam resistance categorisation. From reference laboratory samples, we reviewed minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) and molecular data. Among surveillance samples, per cent resistance was estimated. Referred samples' MICs, by carbapenemase gene presence, were investigated. Ceftazidime/avibactam hospital use was measured in defined daily doses (DDDs).ResultsOverall, 6.3% (4,200/66,914; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 6.1-6.4%) of surveillance-reported ceftazidime/avibactam-tested Gram-negative bacteria were resistant. Percentage resistance per bacterial species varied over time, somewhat stabilising as testing was established, with between April 2019 and March 2020, 1.3% Escherichia coli (288/22,736; 95%CI: 1.1-1.4%), 12.6% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (690/5,495; 95%CI: 11.7-13.5%) and 6.1% of Klebsiella pneumoniae (314/5,179; 95%CI: 5.4-6.7%) being resistant. For 8,437 referred Enterobacterales, MIC determination found 11.5% (968/8,437; 95%CI: 10.8-12.2%) resistant. Among resistant isolates, 89.3% (864/968; 95%CI: 87.1-91.1%) had metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes. Of 908 MBL-negative isolates, producing ≥ 1 non-metallo-carbapenemase(s), 2.1% (19/908; 95%CI: 1.3-3.2%) were resistant. Since March 2017, 69.5% (105/151) of English National Health Service Trusts used ceftazidime/avibactam. Monthly usage progressed from 21 to 744 DDDs in March 2020.ConclusionFor appropriate treatment, carbapenemase gene detection and variant identification in ceftazidime/avibactam surveillance matters. Detecting emerging resistant pathogens and preventing spread within healthcare settings requires vigilance.
期刊介绍:
Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.