Effectiveness and Toxicity in Older Patients Receiving Anticancer Agents: A Retrospective Analysis of Australian Patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Joseph S Taylor, Cassandra White, Larissa Collins, Benjamin Moran, Craig Kukard
{"title":"Effectiveness and Toxicity in Older Patients Receiving Anticancer Agents: A Retrospective Analysis of Australian Patients.","authors":"Joseph S Taylor, Cassandra White, Larissa Collins, Benjamin Moran, Craig Kukard","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of older adults being treated for cancer is increasing. Despite this, older patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Those who are included are unlikely to be an accurate reflection of real-world patients as many are excluded based on performance status and comorbidities. There is a paucity of data examining the toxicity, and effectiveness, of systemic therapy in this group; particularly in a regional Australian cohort. Retrospective data from patients ≥75 years, on treatment for a solid organ malignancy in an Australian regional center was collected to assess the toxicity, and effectiveness, of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Ninety-two patients were included. The mean age was 81. There was no significant difference in overall survival based on; age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, or number of comorbidities. Only 27% of treatments were ceased due to toxicity. 35% of patients on chemotherapy had had a dose reduction during treatment. Grade ≥3 toxicity was experienced by 32% of patients who received chemotherapy-containing regimens and 22% who received immunotherapy-containing regimens. To our knowledge, this is the first study providing real-world data on the effectiveness, and safety, of anti-cancer agents in older patients in a regional Australian center across multiple tumor streams. In older adults otherwise well enough for treatment, outcomes from treatment were not greatly affected by age. Other factors, rather than age and comorbidities alone, may predict outcomes. The use of screening tools may help select patients for comprehensive geriatric assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of older adults being treated for cancer is increasing. Despite this, older patients are under-represented in clinical trials. Those who are included are unlikely to be an accurate reflection of real-world patients as many are excluded based on performance status and comorbidities. There is a paucity of data examining the toxicity, and effectiveness, of systemic therapy in this group; particularly in a regional Australian cohort. Retrospective data from patients ≥75 years, on treatment for a solid organ malignancy in an Australian regional center was collected to assess the toxicity, and effectiveness, of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Ninety-two patients were included. The mean age was 81. There was no significant difference in overall survival based on; age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, or number of comorbidities. Only 27% of treatments were ceased due to toxicity. 35% of patients on chemotherapy had had a dose reduction during treatment. Grade ≥3 toxicity was experienced by 32% of patients who received chemotherapy-containing regimens and 22% who received immunotherapy-containing regimens. To our knowledge, this is the first study providing real-world data on the effectiveness, and safety, of anti-cancer agents in older patients in a regional Australian center across multiple tumor streams. In older adults otherwise well enough for treatment, outcomes from treatment were not greatly affected by age. Other factors, rather than age and comorbidities alone, may predict outcomes. The use of screening tools may help select patients for comprehensive geriatric assessment.

老年患者接受抗癌药物的有效性和毒性:对澳大利亚患者的回顾性分析。
接受癌症治疗的老年人数量正在增加。尽管如此,老年患者在临床试验中的代表性不足。那些被纳入的人不太可能是真实世界患者的准确反映,因为许多人是基于表现状态和合并症而被排除在外的。在这一群体中,检查全身治疗的毒性和有效性的数据缺乏;特别是在澳大利亚地区的队列中。在澳大利亚的一个区域中心收集了年龄≥75岁的实体器官恶性肿瘤患者的回顾性数据,以评估免疫治疗和化疗的毒性和有效性。纳入92例患者。平均年龄为81岁。两组的总生存率无显著差异;年龄,东部肿瘤合作组评分,或合并症的数量。只有27%的治疗因毒性而停止。35%的化疗患者在治疗期间减少了剂量。32%接受含化疗方案的患者和22%接受含免疫治疗方案的患者出现≥3级毒性。据我们所知,这是第一个在澳大利亚区域中心针对多种肿瘤流的老年患者提供抗癌药物有效性和安全性的真实数据的研究。在其他方面足以接受治疗的老年人中,治疗结果不受年龄的很大影响。其他因素,而不是年龄和合并症,可能预测结果。使用筛查工具可以帮助选择患者进行全面的老年评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信