Harmonizing measurement of eczema control: mapping scores between the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool and the Recap of Atopic Eczema instrument.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Jordan Gillespie, Gina N Bash, Michael E Jacobson, Emile Latour, Eric L Simpson
{"title":"Harmonizing measurement of eczema control: mapping scores between the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool and the Recap of Atopic Eczema instrument.","authors":"Jordan Gillespie, Gina N Bash, Michael E Jacobson, Emile Latour, Eric L Simpson","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set for atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, including four core outcome domains: clinician-reported signs, patient-reported symptoms, eczema control and quality of life. For eczema control, the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) were chosen through consensus methods as equivalent instruments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop equations to map scores between ADCT and RECAP to facilitate inter-measurement comparison and data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AD completed the HOME core outcome set of instruments, including ADCT, RECAP, Dermatology Life Quality Index series, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, during routine clinic visits. Clinicians assessed disease severity using the Investigator Global Assessment x Body Surface Area measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 50 participants, ADCT and RECAP were strongly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.970). Four mapping models were evaluated: simple linear regression (SLR), SLR without intercept, square root transformation (SRT) and SRT without intercept. While the SRT no intercept model had the lowest root mean square error, it produced nonlinear confidence intervals and risked overfitting. The SLR no intercept model, with high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.971) and interpretability, was selected as the primary approach. Two equations were derived to convert scores between ADCT and RECAP, enabling standardized comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides two equations for mapping between ADCT and RECAP, strengthening the HOME outcome measurement set and synthesizing the two measures for clinical and research purposes. Validation with larger, independent cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"451-457"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set for atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, including four core outcome domains: clinician-reported signs, patient-reported symptoms, eczema control and quality of life. For eczema control, the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) were chosen through consensus methods as equivalent instruments.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop equations to map scores between ADCT and RECAP to facilitate inter-measurement comparison and data synthesis.

Methods: Patients with AD completed the HOME core outcome set of instruments, including ADCT, RECAP, Dermatology Life Quality Index series, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, during routine clinic visits. Clinicians assessed disease severity using the Investigator Global Assessment x Body Surface Area measure.

Results: Among 50 participants, ADCT and RECAP were strongly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.970). Four mapping models were evaluated: simple linear regression (SLR), SLR without intercept, square root transformation (SRT) and SRT without intercept. While the SRT no intercept model had the lowest root mean square error, it produced nonlinear confidence intervals and risked overfitting. The SLR no intercept model, with high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.971) and interpretability, was selected as the primary approach. Two equations were derived to convert scores between ADCT and RECAP, enabling standardized comparisons.

Conclusions: This study provides two equations for mapping between ADCT and RECAP, strengthening the HOME outcome measurement set and synthesizing the two measures for clinical and research purposes. Validation with larger, independent cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.

湿疹控制的协调测量-特应性皮炎控制工具与特应性湿疹仪器综述之间的映射评分。
背景:协调湿疹结果测量(HOME)已经为特应性皮炎(AD)临床试验建立了核心结果集,包括四个核心结果域:临床报告的体征、患者报告的症状、湿疹控制和生活质量。对于湿疹控制,通过共识方法选择特应性皮炎控制工具(ADCT)和特应性湿疹回顾(Recap)作为等效工具。本研究旨在建立ADCT和RECAP之间的分数映射方程,以便于测量间比较和数据综合。方法:AD患者在常规门诊就诊时完成HOME核心指标集,包括ADCT、RECAP、皮肤病生活质量指数系列(DLQI)、瘙痒峰值数值评定量表(PP-NRS)和患者导向湿疹量表(POEM)。临床医生使用研究者总体评估x体表面积(IGAxBSA)评估疾病严重程度。结果:50名被试中,ADCT与RECAP呈正相关(Pearson相关系数r = 0.970)。评估了四种映射模型:简单线性回归(SLR)、无截距SLR、平方根变换(SRT)和无截距SRT。虽然SRT无截距模型具有最低的均方根误差(RMSE),但它产生非线性置信区间并存在过拟合风险。选择具有较高预测精度(r²= 0.971)和可解释性的SLR无截距模型作为主要方法。导出了两个方程来转换ADCT和RECAP之间的分数,从而实现标准化比较。结论:本研究为ADCT和RECAP之间的映射提供了两个方程,强化了HOME结局测量集,并将两者综合起来用于临床和研究目的。有必要通过更大的独立队列验证来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信