Association of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes with Overall Survival in Patients with Primary Malignant Anorectal Melanoma: A Population-Based Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2493886
Shaofeng Liu, Guixiang Wang, Xiaoping Niu, Wei Wang
{"title":"Association of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes with Overall Survival in Patients with Primary Malignant Anorectal Melanoma: A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Shaofeng Liu, Guixiang Wang, Xiaoping Niu, Wei Wang","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2493886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare tumor characterized by its aggressive behavior. To date, there has been no comprehensive investigation into the association between the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) and the prognosis of patients with malignant AM who have undergone surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with primary malignant AM who have undergone surgical intervention between 2000 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between different LODDS groups. Multivariate Cox models were employed to evaluate the independent association between LODDS and overall survival (OS). An analysis to explore the potential influence of unmeasured confounders on the relationship between LODDS and OS was conducted using the E value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included a total of 126 eligible patients. KM analysis revealed that patients with low LODDS exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with high LODDS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that LODDS was independently associated with OS. The calculated E value suggested that the potential impact of unmeasured confounders on the association between LODDS and OS was likely minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that LODDS is independently associated with the prognosis of patients with AM undergoing surgical intervention. These results may enhance clinicians' understanding of the prognosis of this rare malignancy and provide a basis for guiding therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2493886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2493886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malignant anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare tumor characterized by its aggressive behavior. To date, there has been no comprehensive investigation into the association between the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) and the prognosis of patients with malignant AM who have undergone surgical intervention.

Methods: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with primary malignant AM who have undergone surgical intervention between 2000 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between different LODDS groups. Multivariate Cox models were employed to evaluate the independent association between LODDS and overall survival (OS). An analysis to explore the potential influence of unmeasured confounders on the relationship between LODDS and OS was conducted using the E value.

Results: The study included a total of 126 eligible patients. KM analysis revealed that patients with low LODDS exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with high LODDS (p < 0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that LODDS was independently associated with OS. The calculated E value suggested that the potential impact of unmeasured confounders on the association between LODDS and OS was likely minimal.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that LODDS is independently associated with the prognosis of patients with AM undergoing surgical intervention. These results may enhance clinicians' understanding of the prognosis of this rare malignancy and provide a basis for guiding therapeutic decisions.

原发性恶性肛肠黑色素瘤患者淋巴结阳性的对数赔率与总生存率的关系:一项基于人群的研究
背景:恶性肛门直肠黑色素瘤(AM)是一种罕见的肿瘤,其特征是具有侵袭性。迄今为止,还没有全面的研究表明淋巴结阳性(LODDS)的对数赔率与恶性AM患者手术干预后的预后之间的关系。方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取2000年至2021年间接受手术干预的原发性恶性AM患者的数据。采用Kaplan-Meier (KM)法和log-rank检验比较不同LODDS组间的生存曲线。采用多变量Cox模型评估LODDS与总生存期(OS)之间的独立关联。利用E值分析了未测量混杂因素对LODDS和OS之间关系的潜在影响。结果:该研究共纳入126例符合条件的患者。KM分析显示,与高LODDS患者相比,低LODDS患者的OS明显改善(p)。结论:LODDS与接受手术干预的AM患者的预后独立相关。这些结果可以提高临床医生对这种罕见恶性肿瘤预后的认识,并为指导治疗决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信