{"title":"Clinical validation of a cross-platform digital visual acuity measurement system.","authors":"Juan C Costa, Daniel M Amorim, Paulo R Lins","doi":"10.1177/11206721251336001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to validate visual acuity measurements using a cross-platform system in an ophthalmological setting.MethodsVisual acuity was assessed at a distance of 5 m using two different modalities: printed and digital optotypes. The devices included Android, LG WebOS and Samsung Tizen smart TVs. Optotypes were presented in the logMAR scale. Two modalities, a single row and a block of symbols, presented SLOAN letters and Tumbling-E symbols.ResultsVisual acuity measurements of 190 participants aged 12 to 60 years demonstrated good-to-strong test-retest correlation (ICC > 0.75) and minimal bias (-0.03 to 0.02 logMAR). Limits of agreement were comparable to other studies (0.13-0.26 logMAR), with the smallest values for Tumbling-E row presentation in all devices and the highest value for Sloan chart in LG device. ANOVA revealed no statistical differences in visual acuity across devices. Sloan letters showed superior visual acuity compared to Tumbling-E (<i>p</i> < 0.001), however, this difference corresponded to only 2 letters of visual acuity.ConclusionThe digital cross-platform evaluated serves as a versatile substitute for traditional visual acuity assessments in individuals aged 12 years and older. Further research is necessary for patients with visual acuity worse than 0.5 logMAR and for conducting vision screenings in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1824-1832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251336001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to validate visual acuity measurements using a cross-platform system in an ophthalmological setting.MethodsVisual acuity was assessed at a distance of 5 m using two different modalities: printed and digital optotypes. The devices included Android, LG WebOS and Samsung Tizen smart TVs. Optotypes were presented in the logMAR scale. Two modalities, a single row and a block of symbols, presented SLOAN letters and Tumbling-E symbols.ResultsVisual acuity measurements of 190 participants aged 12 to 60 years demonstrated good-to-strong test-retest correlation (ICC > 0.75) and minimal bias (-0.03 to 0.02 logMAR). Limits of agreement were comparable to other studies (0.13-0.26 logMAR), with the smallest values for Tumbling-E row presentation in all devices and the highest value for Sloan chart in LG device. ANOVA revealed no statistical differences in visual acuity across devices. Sloan letters showed superior visual acuity compared to Tumbling-E (p < 0.001), however, this difference corresponded to only 2 letters of visual acuity.ConclusionThe digital cross-platform evaluated serves as a versatile substitute for traditional visual acuity assessments in individuals aged 12 years and older. Further research is necessary for patients with visual acuity worse than 0.5 logMAR and for conducting vision screenings in young children.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.