Clinical validation of a cross-platform digital visual acuity measurement system.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1177/11206721251336001
Juan C Costa, Daniel M Amorim, Paulo R Lins
{"title":"Clinical validation of a cross-platform digital visual acuity measurement system.","authors":"Juan C Costa, Daniel M Amorim, Paulo R Lins","doi":"10.1177/11206721251336001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to validate visual acuity measurements using a cross-platform system in an ophthalmological setting.MethodsVisual acuity was assessed at a distance of 5 m using two different modalities: printed and digital optotypes. The devices included Android, LG WebOS and Samsung Tizen smart TVs. Optotypes were presented in the logMAR scale. Two modalities, a single row and a block of symbols, presented SLOAN letters and Tumbling-E symbols.ResultsVisual acuity measurements of 190 participants aged 12 to 60 years demonstrated good-to-strong test-retest correlation (ICC > 0.75) and minimal bias (-0.03 to 0.02 logMAR). Limits of agreement were comparable to other studies (0.13-0.26 logMAR), with the smallest values for Tumbling-E row presentation in all devices and the highest value for Sloan chart in LG device. ANOVA revealed no statistical differences in visual acuity across devices. Sloan letters showed superior visual acuity compared to Tumbling-E (<i>p</i> < 0.001), however, this difference corresponded to only 2 letters of visual acuity.ConclusionThe digital cross-platform evaluated serves as a versatile substitute for traditional visual acuity assessments in individuals aged 12 years and older. Further research is necessary for patients with visual acuity worse than 0.5 logMAR and for conducting vision screenings in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1824-1832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251336001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to validate visual acuity measurements using a cross-platform system in an ophthalmological setting.MethodsVisual acuity was assessed at a distance of 5 m using two different modalities: printed and digital optotypes. The devices included Android, LG WebOS and Samsung Tizen smart TVs. Optotypes were presented in the logMAR scale. Two modalities, a single row and a block of symbols, presented SLOAN letters and Tumbling-E symbols.ResultsVisual acuity measurements of 190 participants aged 12 to 60 years demonstrated good-to-strong test-retest correlation (ICC > 0.75) and minimal bias (-0.03 to 0.02 logMAR). Limits of agreement were comparable to other studies (0.13-0.26 logMAR), with the smallest values for Tumbling-E row presentation in all devices and the highest value for Sloan chart in LG device. ANOVA revealed no statistical differences in visual acuity across devices. Sloan letters showed superior visual acuity compared to Tumbling-E (p < 0.001), however, this difference corresponded to only 2 letters of visual acuity.ConclusionThe digital cross-platform evaluated serves as a versatile substitute for traditional visual acuity assessments in individuals aged 12 years and older. Further research is necessary for patients with visual acuity worse than 0.5 logMAR and for conducting vision screenings in young children.

跨平台数字视力测量系统的临床验证。
目的:本研究旨在验证在眼科环境中使用跨平台系统进行视力测量。方法采用印刷镜和数字视镜两种不同的方式在5 m的距离上评估视力。这些设备包括安卓、LG WebOS和三星Tizen智能电视。视型采用logMAR量表。两种模式,单行和块符号,表示斯隆字母和tumblr - e符号。结果190名年龄在12 ~ 60岁的参与者的视力测量结果显示出良好到强的测试-重测相关性(ICC > 0.75)和最小的偏差(-0.03 ~ 0.02 logMAR)。一致性极限与其他研究相当(0.13-0.26 logMAR),在所有设备中,tumblr - e行表示的值最小,LG设备中的Sloan图的值最高。方差分析显示,不同设备的视力没有统计学差异。与tumblr - e相比,Sloan字母显示出更好的视觉敏锐度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信