Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in UK heart failure care: a national primary care cohort study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325132
Rory Maclean, Yang Chen, R Thomas Lumbers, Anoop Dinesh Shah
{"title":"Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in UK heart failure care: a national primary care cohort study.","authors":"Rory Maclean, Yang Chen, R Thomas Lumbers, Anoop Dinesh Shah","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce mortality and hospitalisation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but are underused, despite recommendation in key guidelines. Identifying the factors contributing to underuse and addressing adherence are key components of a learning health system. We aimed to evaluate MRA prescription in people with HFrEF who would benefit, based on the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) HFrEF guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used clinical code lists to identify people with HFrEF in primary care electronic health record (EHR) data from The Health Improvement Network database. For each calendar year 2014-2020, we identified individuals who met the NICE guideline criteria for MRA therapy. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to determine the factors contributing to MRA prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 24 135 people with HFrEF studied between 2014 and 2020, 12 150 person-years were eligible for MRA treatment. The MRA prescription rate increased from 41% to 55%. MRA prescription was inversely associated with age (OR per 1 SD, 95% CI) (0.02 (0.01, 0.03)), increasing glomerular filtration rate (0.37 (0.25, 0.55)), hypertension (0.21 (0.40, 0.78)) and prescription of antihypertensives (0.03 (0.02, 0.07)). MRA prescription was associated with male gender (6.31 (3.20, 12.4)), dilated cardiomyopathy (25.9 (7.48, 89.4)), calendar year (2.17 (1.85, 2.54) per year after study start) and prescription of sacubitril/valsartan (214 (56, 823)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRAs are underused in people with HFrEF in the UK. Although prescribing increased between 2014 and 2020, half of the cohort still did not receive the therapy. Older age, gender, comorbidities and co-prescriptions were linked to MRA underuse. Understanding the factors contributing to underprescribing at a population level should be used to inform quality improvement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce mortality and hospitalisation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but are underused, despite recommendation in key guidelines. Identifying the factors contributing to underuse and addressing adherence are key components of a learning health system. We aimed to evaluate MRA prescription in people with HFrEF who would benefit, based on the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) HFrEF guideline.

Methods: We used clinical code lists to identify people with HFrEF in primary care electronic health record (EHR) data from The Health Improvement Network database. For each calendar year 2014-2020, we identified individuals who met the NICE guideline criteria for MRA therapy. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to determine the factors contributing to MRA prescription.

Results: Among 24 135 people with HFrEF studied between 2014 and 2020, 12 150 person-years were eligible for MRA treatment. The MRA prescription rate increased from 41% to 55%. MRA prescription was inversely associated with age (OR per 1 SD, 95% CI) (0.02 (0.01, 0.03)), increasing glomerular filtration rate (0.37 (0.25, 0.55)), hypertension (0.21 (0.40, 0.78)) and prescription of antihypertensives (0.03 (0.02, 0.07)). MRA prescription was associated with male gender (6.31 (3.20, 12.4)), dilated cardiomyopathy (25.9 (7.48, 89.4)), calendar year (2.17 (1.85, 2.54) per year after study start) and prescription of sacubitril/valsartan (214 (56, 823)).

Conclusions: MRAs are underused in people with HFrEF in the UK. Although prescribing increased between 2014 and 2020, half of the cohort still did not receive the therapy. Older age, gender, comorbidities and co-prescriptions were linked to MRA underuse. Understanding the factors contributing to underprescribing at a population level should be used to inform quality improvement strategies.

矿化皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)在英国心力衰竭护理中的应用:一项国家初级保健队列研究。
背景和目的:矿化皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)可降低心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的死亡率和住院率,但尽管在关键指南中有推荐,但仍未充分使用。确定导致使用不足的因素并解决依从性问题是学习型卫生系统的关键组成部分。我们的目的是根据英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE) HFrEF指南,评估HFrEF患者的MRA处方是否会受益。方法:我们使用临床代码列表来识别来自健康改善网络数据库的初级保健电子健康记录(EHR)数据中的HFrEF患者。在2014-2020年的每个日历年,我们确定了符合NICE MRA治疗指南标准的个体。我们拟合了混合效应logistic回归模型来确定影响MRA处方的因素。结果:在2014年至2020年期间研究的24135例HFrEF患者中,12150人年符合MRA治疗条件。MRA处方率从41%增加到55%。MRA处方与年龄(OR / 1 SD, 95% CI)(0.02(0.01, 0.03))、肾小球滤过率增加(0.37(0.25,0.55))、高血压(0.21(0.40,0.78))、抗高血压药物处方(0.03(0.02,0.07))呈负相关。MRA处方与男性(6.31(3.20,12.4))、扩张型心肌病(25.9(7.48,89.4))、历年(研究开始后每年2.17(1.85,2.54))和杉木比里尔/缬沙坦处方(214(56,823))相关。结论:mra在英国HFrEF患者中的应用不足。尽管2014年至2020年间处方量有所增加,但仍有一半的队列患者未接受治疗。年龄、性别、合并症和联合处方与MRA使用不足有关。了解在人口水平上导致处方不足的因素应用于为质量改进策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信