Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2544-2468
Jake Sheraj Jacob, Jeffrey Than, Christine Tang, Joseph Cano, Rehman Sheikh, Sharon Wolfson, Aaron P Thrift, Uma Munnur, Robert J Sealock
{"title":"Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy.","authors":"Jake Sheraj Jacob, Jeffrey Than, Christine Tang, Joseph Cano, Rehman Sheikh, Sharon Wolfson, Aaron P Thrift, Uma Munnur, Robert J Sealock","doi":"10.1055/a-2544-2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Gastrointestinal debris retention (GIDR) during endoscopy can result in aborted procedures, intubation, and aspiration. GIDR has increased significance with uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use. Outcome analysis is vital to risk-stratify patients with GIDR during endoscopy. Our study evaluated the effect of GIDR on endoscopic complications.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopy between May 2016 and December 2021 with documented GIDR. The study included 138 patients with GIDR and 275 controls. Propensity score matching between patients with GIDR and controls was performed in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. T-tests and chi square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GIDR group was younger and had lower BMI, with no difference in sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or use of monitored anesthesia care. GIDR was more frequently encountered when indications were abnormal imaging, pain, and pancreatico-biliary. Amount of GIDR was quantified as \"large\" in 37.7% of cases and size of debris was associated with rate of aborted procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study did not demonstrate a significant increase in post-procedure complications in patients with GIDR. Further, the GIDR group had higher rates of opiate use, which can guide stratification of retention risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25442468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2544-2468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Gastrointestinal debris retention (GIDR) during endoscopy can result in aborted procedures, intubation, and aspiration. GIDR has increased significance with uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use. Outcome analysis is vital to risk-stratify patients with GIDR during endoscopy. Our study evaluated the effect of GIDR on endoscopic complications.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopy between May 2016 and December 2021 with documented GIDR. The study included 138 patients with GIDR and 275 controls. Propensity score matching between patients with GIDR and controls was performed in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. T-tests and chi square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables.

Results: The GIDR group was younger and had lower BMI, with no difference in sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or use of monitored anesthesia care. GIDR was more frequently encountered when indications were abnormal imaging, pain, and pancreatico-biliary. Amount of GIDR was quantified as "large" in 37.7% of cases and size of debris was associated with rate of aborted procedures.

Conclusions: Our study did not demonstrate a significant increase in post-procedure complications in patients with GIDR. Further, the GIDR group had higher rates of opiate use, which can guide stratification of retention risk.

上内镜检查中残留胃肠道碎片的结果。
背景和研究目的:内镜检查期间胃肠道碎片滞留(GIDR)可导致手术流产、插管和误吸。GIDR随着胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的使用而增加。结果分析对于内镜检查期间GIDR患者的风险分层至关重要。我们的研究评估了GIDR对内镜并发症的影响。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2016年5月至2021年12月期间接受内窥镜检查的有记录的GIDR患者。该研究包括138名GIDR患者和275名对照组。根据年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)状态,将GIDR患者和对照组按1:2的比例进行倾向评分匹配。使用t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和分类变量。结果:GIDR组更年轻,BMI更低,在性别、种族、美国麻醉医师协会地位或使用麻醉监护方面没有差异。GIDR更常见于影像异常、疼痛和胰胆指征。在37.7%的病例中,GIDR的数量被量化为“大”,碎片的大小与手术流产率有关。结论:我们的研究没有显示GIDR患者术后并发症的显著增加。此外,GIDR组有更高的阿片类药物使用率,这可以指导滞留风险的分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信