A simple on-field fast knee-flexion test to assess acute knee flexor fatigue.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Cornelis J de Ruiter, Lucas M Baak, Yfke Westerling, Erik Wilmes
{"title":"A simple on-field fast knee-flexion test to assess acute knee flexor fatigue.","authors":"Cornelis J de Ruiter, Lucas M Baak, Yfke Westerling, Erik Wilmes","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05732-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In a practical setting, outside the laboratory, acute muscle fatigue may be underestimated because substantial recovery occurs during the elapsed time between the end of exercise and fatigue assessment. We introduce a simple field test to assess knee flexor contractile function quickly after exercise cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen young amateur football players performed maximally fast knee flexions (FKFs) in the prone position with their dominant leg, before (pre) and 20 s after finishing a series of fourteen fatiguing 40 m sprints (post) and again following 6 min recovery (rec). Peak angular acceleration (PAA) about the knee joint was measured with a small inertial measurement unit (IMU) firmly attached to the shin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although participants only practiced the FKFs for 1 min in the warm-up, the reliability of PPA was good with coefficients of variation of 3.0% (pre), 2.7% (post), and 3.6% (rec). Sprint time increased from 5.96 ± 0.40 s to 6.55 ± 0.37 s (p < 0.001, f = 0.89), PAA decreased from 107.1 ± 11.5 rad.s<sup>-2</sup> to 94.1 ± 11.7 rad.s<sup>-2</sup> (p < 0.001, f = 0.50) and following recovery (p < 0.05) values were 6.15 ± 0.39 s and 103.1 ± 10.7 rad.s<sup>-2</sup>, respectively. The percentage decrease in PAA during FKFs was linearly related (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48, p = 0.01) to the percentage increase in 40 m sprint time. In addition, PAA (pre) was related to the time of the first sprint (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.33, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed FKF test is reliable and can easily be executed to evaluate acute knee flexor muscle fatigue on the field. The presented relations between (changes in) sprint performance and peak knee angular accelerations during isolated fast knee flexions are promising but need confirmation in larger-scaled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05732-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In a practical setting, outside the laboratory, acute muscle fatigue may be underestimated because substantial recovery occurs during the elapsed time between the end of exercise and fatigue assessment. We introduce a simple field test to assess knee flexor contractile function quickly after exercise cessation.

Methods: Fourteen young amateur football players performed maximally fast knee flexions (FKFs) in the prone position with their dominant leg, before (pre) and 20 s after finishing a series of fourteen fatiguing 40 m sprints (post) and again following 6 min recovery (rec). Peak angular acceleration (PAA) about the knee joint was measured with a small inertial measurement unit (IMU) firmly attached to the shin.

Results: Although participants only practiced the FKFs for 1 min in the warm-up, the reliability of PPA was good with coefficients of variation of 3.0% (pre), 2.7% (post), and 3.6% (rec). Sprint time increased from 5.96 ± 0.40 s to 6.55 ± 0.37 s (p < 0.001, f = 0.89), PAA decreased from 107.1 ± 11.5 rad.s-2 to 94.1 ± 11.7 rad.s-2 (p < 0.001, f = 0.50) and following recovery (p < 0.05) values were 6.15 ± 0.39 s and 103.1 ± 10.7 rad.s-2, respectively. The percentage decrease in PAA during FKFs was linearly related (r2 = 0.48, p = 0.01) to the percentage increase in 40 m sprint time. In addition, PAA (pre) was related to the time of the first sprint (r2 = 0.33, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: The proposed FKF test is reliable and can easily be executed to evaluate acute knee flexor muscle fatigue on the field. The presented relations between (changes in) sprint performance and peak knee angular accelerations during isolated fast knee flexions are promising but need confirmation in larger-scaled studies.

一个简单的现场快速膝关节屈曲测试,以评估急性膝关节屈曲疲劳。
目的:在实验室之外的实际环境中,急性肌肉疲劳可能被低估,因为在运动结束和疲劳评估之间的时间内会发生实质性的恢复。我们介绍了一个简单的现场测试,以评估膝关节屈肌收缩功能后,快速停止运动。方法:14名年轻的业余足球运动员在完成一系列14次疲劳的40米短跑(后)之前(前)和20秒之后(后)以主腿俯卧位进行最大快速膝关节屈曲(FKFs),并在6分钟恢复(后)后再次进行。用固定在胫骨上的小型惯性测量单元(IMU)测量膝关节的峰值角加速度(PAA)。结果:虽然参与者在热身时只练习了1分钟的FKFs,但PPA的可靠性较好,变异系数为3.0%(前),2.7%(后)和3.6%(后)。冲刺时间分别从5.96±0.40 s增加到6.55±0.37 s (p -2)和94.1±11.7 rad.s-2 (p -2)。FKFs期间PAA的下降百分比与40 m冲刺时间的增加百分比呈线性相关(r2 = 0.48, p = 0.01)。PAA (pre)与第一次冲刺时间相关(r2 = 0.33, p = 0.03)。结论:所提出的FKF试验是可靠的,可方便地用于评估急性膝关节屈肌疲劳。在孤立的快速膝关节屈曲中,短跑表现和膝关节角加速度峰值之间的关系是有希望的,但需要在更大规模的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信