Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes.
Annina Salome Vischer, Maria Bertsch, Vera Van der Velpen, Franziska Küng, Thenral Socrates, Michael Mayr, Manuel Haschke, Thilo Burkard
{"title":"Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes.","authors":"Annina Salome Vischer, Maria Bertsch, Vera Van der Velpen, Franziska Küng, Thenral Socrates, Michael Mayr, Manuel Haschke, Thilo Burkard","doi":"10.1159/000545908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115-124/65-74 mm Hg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was -11/-6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 -4/-2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (-15/-10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (-8/-1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17813,"journal":{"name":"Kidney & blood pressure research","volume":" ","pages":"325-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney & blood pressure research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes.
Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115-124/65-74 mm Hg.
Results: 88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was -11/-6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 -4/-2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (-15/-10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (-8/-1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2.
Conclusion: Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.
期刊介绍:
This journal comprises both clinical and basic studies at the interface of nephrology, hypertension and cardiovascular research. The topics to be covered include the structural organization and biochemistry of the normal and diseased kidney, the molecular biology of transporters, the physiology and pathophysiology of glomerular filtration and tubular transport, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function and blood pressure control, as well as water, electrolyte and mineral metabolism. Also discussed are the (patho)physiology and (patho) biochemistry of renal hormones, the molecular biology, genetics and clinical course of renal disease and hypertension, the renal elimination, action and clinical use of drugs, as well as dialysis and transplantation. Featuring peer-reviewed original papers, editorials translating basic science into patient-oriented research and disease, in depth reviews, and regular special topic sections, ''Kidney & Blood Pressure Research'' is an important source of information for researchers in nephrology and cardiovascular medicine.