Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kidney & blood pressure research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1159/000545908
Annina Salome Vischer, Maria Bertsch, Vera Van der Velpen, Franziska Küng, Thenral Socrates, Michael Mayr, Manuel Haschke, Thilo Burkard
{"title":"Monotherapy Blood Pressure Response and Control Rates in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Comparison of Four Different Antihypertensive Drug Classes.","authors":"Annina Salome Vischer, Maria Bertsch, Vera Van der Velpen, Franziska Küng, Thenral Socrates, Michael Mayr, Manuel Haschke, Thilo Burkard","doi":"10.1159/000545908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115-124/65-74 mm Hg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was -11/-6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 -4/-2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (-15/-10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (-8/-1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17813,"journal":{"name":"Kidney & blood pressure research","volume":" ","pages":"325-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney & blood pressure research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Four different antihypertensive drug classes are equivalently recommended in the previous guidelines for first-line treatment of arterial hypertension (HTN). However, it is unclear, whether one of these drugs is more capable than the others to reach blood pressure (BP) control. We sought to compare response rates and BP control in these 4 classes.

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed mild to moderate HTN on 24-h BP measurements (ABPM) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril, olmesartan, amlodipine, or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). ABPM was completed at baseline (BL) and after 4 weeks of half dose (treatment period 1 [TP1]). If BP control was not reached after TP1, drug dose was doubled and another ABPM completed after 4 weeks (treatment period 2 [TP2]). Patients were classified as controlled if 24-h mean BP was <130/80 mm Hg, awake BP <135/85 mm Hg, and night BP <120/70 mm Hg, and as optimal if 24-h mean BP was 115-124/65-74 mm Hg.

Results: 88 patients were randomized: 20 (23%) to perindopril, 23 (26%) to olmesartan, 24 (27%) to amlodipine, and 21 (24%) to HCT. Median 24-h mean BP reduction from BL to TP1 was -11/-6 mm Hg and from TP1 to TP2 -4/-2 mm Hg. The highest BP reduction was reached with olmesartan (-15/-10 mm Hg), particularly for diastolic values, the lowest with HCT (-8/-1 mm Hg). 27% of patients reached systo-diastolic BP control, with the best control rate with perindopril and olmesartan (40 and 39%), the lowest with HCT (5%), and 21%/18% reached an optimal treatment goal for systolic/diastolic 24-h mean values, respectively, after TP1. Three additional participants (4%) reached BP control after TP2.

Conclusion: Initial antihypertensive monotherapy failed in most patients (73% uncontrolled, 21%/18% reached optimal treatment goal at TP1) even in low-risk patients, with efficacy varying by drug class (inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system best, HCT least). These findings support guideline-recommended combination therapy.

Treatment-Naïve动脉高血压患者的单药降压反应和控制率:四种不同降压药物类别的随机比较
简介:在先前的动脉性高血压(HTN)一线治疗指南中,四种不同的抗高血压药物类别被同等推荐。然而,目前尚不清楚这些药物中是否有一种比其他药物更能控制血压。我们试图比较这四个类别的反应率和血压控制。方法:24h-BP测量(ABPM)新诊断为轻中度HTN的患者以1:1:1:1:1的方式随机分配到培哚普利、奥美沙坦、氨氯地平或氢氯噻嗪(HCT)组。ABPM分别在基线(BL)和半剂量治疗4周(治疗期1,TP1)后完成。如果TP1后血压仍未得到控制,则加倍给药,并于4周(治疗期2,TP2)后再次进行ABPM。24小时平均血压< 130/80 mmHg,清醒时血压< 135/85 mmHg,夜间血压< 120/70 mmHg为对照组,24小时平均血压为115 - 124/65 - 74 mmHg为最佳组。结果:88例患者被随机分组:培哚普利20例(23%),奥美沙坦23例(26%),氨氯地平24例(27%),HCT 21例(24%)。从BL到TP1的中位24小时平均血压降低为-11/-6 mmHg,从TP1到TP2的中位平均血压降低为-4/-2 mmHg。降压效果最好的是奥美沙坦(-15/-10 mmHg),尤其是舒张值,最低的是HCT (-8/-1 mmHg)。27%的患者达到收缩压控制,其中培哚普利和奥美沙坦控制率最好(40%和39%),HCT最低(5%),TP1后收缩压/舒张压24h平均值达到最佳治疗目标的患者分别为21%/18%。另外3名参与者(4%)在TP2后血压得到控制。结论:即使在低风险患者中,大多数患者(73%未控制,21%/18%在TP1达到最佳治疗目标)初始抗高血压单药治疗失败,其疗效因药物类别而异(肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂最佳,HCT最低)。这些发现支持指南推荐的联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney & blood pressure research
Kidney & blood pressure research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal comprises both clinical and basic studies at the interface of nephrology, hypertension and cardiovascular research. The topics to be covered include the structural organization and biochemistry of the normal and diseased kidney, the molecular biology of transporters, the physiology and pathophysiology of glomerular filtration and tubular transport, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function and blood pressure control, as well as water, electrolyte and mineral metabolism. Also discussed are the (patho)physiology and (patho) biochemistry of renal hormones, the molecular biology, genetics and clinical course of renal disease and hypertension, the renal elimination, action and clinical use of drugs, as well as dialysis and transplantation. Featuring peer-reviewed original papers, editorials translating basic science into patient-oriented research and disease, in depth reviews, and regular special topic sections, ''Kidney & Blood Pressure Research'' is an important source of information for researchers in nephrology and cardiovascular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信