Impact of physician awareness and microbiological examination on incidence of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Li-Jing Xia, Tong-Tong Hou, Xi-Ling Liu, Xue-Bing Chen, Peng-Cheng Lin, Shan-Shan Su, Li Yang, Ying Zhou, Yu-Ping Li
{"title":"Impact of physician awareness and microbiological examination on incidence of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Li-Jing Xia, Tong-Tong Hou, Xi-Ling Liu, Xue-Bing Chen, Peng-Cheng Lin, Shan-Shan Su, Li Yang, Ying Zhou, Yu-Ping Li","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03671-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reported incidence of aspergillosis among COVID-19 patients has varied significantly, which can be partly attributed to differences in diagnostic approaches and levels of physicians' proficiency in diagnosing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Consequently, we conducted a retrospective study to investigate the potential reasons for these discrepancies and analyzed the risk factors for pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from December 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023, from patients who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The research platform was used to screen patients with discharge diagnoses of COVID-19 pneumonia. CAPA was defined according to the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM criteria and the Chinese expert consensus. Clinical data that were collected included data about underlying diseases, laboratory examinations and microbiological detection. Analyses were conducted with R software, with continuous variables analyzed with t-tests, categorical variables analyzed with chi-square tests, and logistic regression and ROC curves used to assess risk factors for CAPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of CAPA was 13.4% in the general ward, 30.8% in the RICU, and 6.8% in other ICUs. The average time to CAPA diagnosis was 5.6 days in general wards, 3.7 days in the RICU, and 7.4 days in other ICUs. Diagnostic testing revealed the following sensitivities: 78% for BALF galactomannan (GM), 48% for serum GM, 52% for culture tests, and 71% for BALF mNGS. Risk factors for CAPA included chronic respiratory disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and diabetes. The primary Aspergillus species identified was A. fumigatus, followed by A. flavus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in incidence may arise from varying levels of physician awareness, which can influence the rate at which BALF and serum GM samples are submitted for testing. The sensitivity of BALF GM is higher than that of serum GM. Furthermore, BALF mNGS has the potential to enhance the clinical detection sensitivity of CAPA. Risk factors for CAPA include chronic respiratory disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and diabetes, which may aid in identifying at-risk patients. The primary Aspergillus species identified was A. fumigatus, followed by A. flavus, providing a reference for clinical empirical treatment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03671-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reported incidence of aspergillosis among COVID-19 patients has varied significantly, which can be partly attributed to differences in diagnostic approaches and levels of physicians' proficiency in diagnosing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Consequently, we conducted a retrospective study to investigate the potential reasons for these discrepancies and analyzed the risk factors for pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19.

Method: Data were retrospectively collected from December 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023, from patients who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The research platform was used to screen patients with discharge diagnoses of COVID-19 pneumonia. CAPA was defined according to the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM criteria and the Chinese expert consensus. Clinical data that were collected included data about underlying diseases, laboratory examinations and microbiological detection. Analyses were conducted with R software, with continuous variables analyzed with t-tests, categorical variables analyzed with chi-square tests, and logistic regression and ROC curves used to assess risk factors for CAPA.

Results: The incidence of CAPA was 13.4% in the general ward, 30.8% in the RICU, and 6.8% in other ICUs. The average time to CAPA diagnosis was 5.6 days in general wards, 3.7 days in the RICU, and 7.4 days in other ICUs. Diagnostic testing revealed the following sensitivities: 78% for BALF galactomannan (GM), 48% for serum GM, 52% for culture tests, and 71% for BALF mNGS. Risk factors for CAPA included chronic respiratory disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and diabetes. The primary Aspergillus species identified was A. fumigatus, followed by A. flavus.

Conclusion: Differences in incidence may arise from varying levels of physician awareness, which can influence the rate at which BALF and serum GM samples are submitted for testing. The sensitivity of BALF GM is higher than that of serum GM. Furthermore, BALF mNGS has the potential to enhance the clinical detection sensitivity of CAPA. Risk factors for CAPA include chronic respiratory disease, chronic renal insufficiency, and diabetes, which may aid in identifying at-risk patients. The primary Aspergillus species identified was A. fumigatus, followed by A. flavus, providing a reference for clinical empirical treatment.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

医师意识和微生物学检查对covid -19相关性肺曲霉病发病率的影响:一项回顾性研究
背景:报告的COVID-19患者中曲霉病发病率差异较大,部分原因是诊断方法和医生诊断COVID-19相关肺曲霉病(CAPA)熟练程度的差异。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,探讨这些差异的潜在原因,并分析了COVID-19患者肺曲霉病的危险因素。方法:回顾性收集2022年12月1日至2023年9月30日在温州医科大学第一附属医院住院的患者资料。利用该研究平台对出院诊断为COVID-19肺炎的患者进行筛查。CAPA是根据2020年ECMM/ISHAM标准和中国专家共识定义的。收集的临床数据包括基础疾病、实验室检查和微生物检测数据。采用R软件进行分析,连续变量采用t检验,分类变量采用卡方检验,logistic回归和ROC曲线评估CAPA的危险因素。结果:CAPA在普通病房的发生率为13.4%,RICU为30.8%,其他icu为6.8%。到CAPA诊断的平均时间在普通病房为5.6天,RICU为3.7天,其他icu为7.4天。诊断试验显示以下敏感性:半乳甘露聚糖(GM)为78%,血清GM为48%,培养试验为52%,BALF mNGS为71%。CAPA的危险因素包括慢性呼吸系统疾病、慢性肾功能不全和糖尿病。鉴定出的主要曲霉种为烟曲霉,其次为黄曲霉。结论:发病率的差异可能源于医生意识水平的不同,这可能会影响BALF和血清GM样本提交检测的比率。BALF GM的敏感性高于血清GM。此外,BALF mNGS具有提高CAPA临床检测敏感性的潜力。CAPA的危险因素包括慢性呼吸系统疾病、慢性肾功能不全和糖尿病,这可能有助于识别高危患者。鉴定出的主要曲霉种为烟曲霉,其次为黄曲霉,为临床经验性治疗提供参考。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信