{"title":"Non-Linear Relationship Between Fasting C-Peptide and Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jicai Ma, Cong Han, Yuanyuan Lv, Hanqing Cai","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S501361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has demonstrated that fasting C-peptide (FCP) serves as a protective element against diabetic retinopathy. But the protective effect of elevated FCP levels against diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains uncertain when these levels exceed specific thresholds. This research aimed to investigate the intrinsic link between FCP concentration and DR in individuals with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1661 individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes participated in this observational analysis, where DR was assessed as the primary outcome and categorized according to FCP levels. Curve fitting analysis and two-part linear regression models were applied to assess the relationship between DR and FCP, and exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study found a non-linear relationship between the two, as well as a threshold effect at an FCP of 4.11 ng/mL. Below the critical value, each 1 ng/mL increase in FCP levels was associated with a 24% lower risk of DR (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.86). Above the cutoff, the relationship did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.87-2.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a nonlinear relationship between FCP level and DR risk, which was negatively correlated at first but stabilized at a lower level when FCP>4.11 ng/mL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1035-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11988194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S501361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous research has demonstrated that fasting C-peptide (FCP) serves as a protective element against diabetic retinopathy. But the protective effect of elevated FCP levels against diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains uncertain when these levels exceed specific thresholds. This research aimed to investigate the intrinsic link between FCP concentration and DR in individuals with T2DM.
Methods: A total of 1661 individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes participated in this observational analysis, where DR was assessed as the primary outcome and categorized according to FCP levels. Curve fitting analysis and two-part linear regression models were applied to assess the relationship between DR and FCP, and exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the threshold.
Results: Our study found a non-linear relationship between the two, as well as a threshold effect at an FCP of 4.11 ng/mL. Below the critical value, each 1 ng/mL increase in FCP levels was associated with a 24% lower risk of DR (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.86). Above the cutoff, the relationship did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.87-2.66).
Conclusion: There was a nonlinear relationship between FCP level and DR risk, which was negatively correlated at first but stabilized at a lower level when FCP>4.11 ng/mL.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.