Diversity in the Rubisco temperature response kinetics and photosynthesis among four linted cotton (Gossypium) species.

IF 5.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Demi Sargent, Spencer M Whitney, Katrina Broughton, Susan Y Jaconis, David Tissue, Michael Bange, Warren Conaty, Robert E Sharwood
{"title":"Diversity in the Rubisco temperature response kinetics and photosynthesis among four linted cotton (Gossypium) species.","authors":"Demi Sargent, Spencer M Whitney, Katrina Broughton, Susan Y Jaconis, David Tissue, Michael Bange, Warren Conaty, Robert E Sharwood","doi":"10.1093/jxb/eraf178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increasing urgency for more productive and resource-use efficient crops to cope with changing climates. One possibility to improve crop productivity is to enhance photosynthesis. Here, we studied four linted cotton species, (Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. herbaceum), for diversity in the temperature response of Rubisco catalysis and impact on carbon assimilation. Compared with the model C3-plant tobacco, each cotton Rubisco had a slower carboxylation rate (kcatc) and higher CO2-affinity (lower Kc21%O2) in response to temperature, with the specificity for CO2 over O2 (Sc/o) of G. hirsutum Rubisco being thermally advantaged above 20°C relative to tobacco. Consistent with high homology between the cotton species Rubisco large subunits, there was little difference in the response of kcatc or Kc21%O2 to temperature. However, at temperatures above 15°C the carboxylation efficiency (kcatc/ Kc21%O2) of G. herbaceum Rubisco significantly exceeded G. hirsutum Rubisco by 23-29%, with the G. herbaceum enzyme predicted to support 20% higher rates of photosynthesis than tobacco Rubisco at 35°C. Leaf-level photosynthetic measurements at 28°C however showed no significant variation in the net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rates, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intrinsic water-use efficiency, or photosynthetic electron transport rates between each cotton species. Using the 'OptiFitACi' A/Ci model parameterised with cotton Rubisco and mesophyll conductance (gm) values, the maximum Rubisco carboxylase activity (Vcmax) was 20% lower in G. herbaceum leaves compared to G. hirsutum. However, the greater Rubisco kinetics of G. herbaceum did not confer higher leaf photosynthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increasing urgency for more productive and resource-use efficient crops to cope with changing climates. One possibility to improve crop productivity is to enhance photosynthesis. Here, we studied four linted cotton species, (Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. herbaceum), for diversity in the temperature response of Rubisco catalysis and impact on carbon assimilation. Compared with the model C3-plant tobacco, each cotton Rubisco had a slower carboxylation rate (kcatc) and higher CO2-affinity (lower Kc21%O2) in response to temperature, with the specificity for CO2 over O2 (Sc/o) of G. hirsutum Rubisco being thermally advantaged above 20°C relative to tobacco. Consistent with high homology between the cotton species Rubisco large subunits, there was little difference in the response of kcatc or Kc21%O2 to temperature. However, at temperatures above 15°C the carboxylation efficiency (kcatc/ Kc21%O2) of G. herbaceum Rubisco significantly exceeded G. hirsutum Rubisco by 23-29%, with the G. herbaceum enzyme predicted to support 20% higher rates of photosynthesis than tobacco Rubisco at 35°C. Leaf-level photosynthetic measurements at 28°C however showed no significant variation in the net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rates, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intrinsic water-use efficiency, or photosynthetic electron transport rates between each cotton species. Using the 'OptiFitACi' A/Ci model parameterised with cotton Rubisco and mesophyll conductance (gm) values, the maximum Rubisco carboxylase activity (Vcmax) was 20% lower in G. herbaceum leaves compared to G. hirsutum. However, the greater Rubisco kinetics of G. herbaceum did not confer higher leaf photosynthesis.

四种棉种Rubisco温度响应动力学和光合作用的多样性。
为应对不断变化的气候,越来越迫切需要生产更高产、资源利用效率更高的作物。提高作物产量的一种可能是加强光合作用。本研究以四种棉种(棉)(棉)为研究对象,研究了Rubisco催化温度响应的多样性及其对碳同化的影响。与模型c3植株烟草相比,每一种棉花Rubisco对温度的响应都具有较低的羧化速率(kcatc)和较高的CO2亲和力(Kc21%O2),且在20℃以上相对于烟草,G. hirsutum Rubisco对CO2 / O2的特异性(Sc/o)更有利。kcatc和Kc21%O2对温度的响应差异不大,这与两种棉花Rubisco大亚基的高度同源性一致。然而,在高于15°C的温度下,G. herbaceum Rubisco的羧化效率(kcatc/ Kc21%O2)显著超过G. hirsutum Rubisco 23-29%,预计在35°C时,G. herbaceum酶的光合速率比烟草Rubisco高20%。然而,在28°C下叶片水平的光合作用测量显示,每个棉花品种之间的净光合CO2同化率、气孔导度、蒸腾速率、内在水分利用效率或光合电子传递率没有显著差异。利用OptiFitACi A/Ci模型参数化棉花Rubisco和叶叶导度(gm)值,草叶棉Rubisco羧化酶最大活性(Vcmax)比毛棉低20%。然而,更大的Rubisco动力学并没有赋予更高的叶片光合作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Botany
Journal of Experimental Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
450
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology. Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信