Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheiashaa, Anna Boda, Felix Yang, Emily Kamali, Regina Scott, Kate Huntress, Tejas Saravanan, Ahmed E Saelm, Fouad Jaber, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Dahiya, Laura Alba, Nikki Duong
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of the hepatitis E virus vaccine.","authors":"Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheiashaa, Anna Boda, Felix Yang, Emily Kamali, Regina Scott, Kate Huntress, Tejas Saravanan, Ahmed E Saelm, Fouad Jaber, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Dahiya, Laura Alba, Nikki Duong","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2474893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a global cause of viral hepatitis. While genotypes 1 and 2 cause acute hepatitis in Asia and Africa, genotypes 3 and 4 lead to sporadic acute or chronic hepatitis in America and Europe. Pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals, and those with chronic liver disease face a higher risk of severe outcomes. HEV recombinant vaccine is approved for outbreak use in China but awaits Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the HEV vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search in Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase, employing specific terms for the recombinant HEV vaccine. Eligibility criteria involved all-age individuals receiving recombinant HEV vaccine in randomized controlled trials. Covidence software was used to screen studies, and data extraction encompassed study characteristics, baseline data, and efficacy outcomes by four reviewers. Bias evaluation was completed using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool. Statistical analysis involved use of Revman v5.4 with a random effect model, considering <i>P</i> < 0.05 as statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in HEV vaccine efficacy compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 25.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.21, 68.75, <i>P</i> < 0.00001) with a substantial reduction in hepatitis E cases (OR: 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.11, <i>P</i> < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the HEV vaccine exhibited a significant increase in injection pain (OR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.03, 2.36, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and injection bruising (OR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.76, 7.48, <i>P</i> = 0.0005). No statistically significant differences were observed in fever (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.86, 1.23, <i>P</i> = 0.76) or headache (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.72, 1.84, <i>P</i> = 0.56). Local events significantly increased with the vaccine (OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.38, 1.63, <i>P</i> < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in systemic events (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.86, 1.31, <i>P</i> = 0.59) or serious adverse events (OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.16, 2.07, <i>P</i> = 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the significant and favorable impact of the recombinant HEV vaccine on the reduction of HEV cases. However, safety considerations are notable, as the vaccine is associated with a significant increase in injection-related pain and bruising. While localized adverse events were more frequent with the vaccine, there were no statistically significant differences in systemic events, serious adverse events, fever, or headache compared to placebo. These findings emphasize the overall effectiveness of the HEV vaccine in preventing HEV infections but highlight the need for careful monitoring and consideration of potential localized side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 3","pages":"327-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2474893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a global cause of viral hepatitis. While genotypes 1 and 2 cause acute hepatitis in Asia and Africa, genotypes 3 and 4 lead to sporadic acute or chronic hepatitis in America and Europe. Pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals, and those with chronic liver disease face a higher risk of severe outcomes. HEV recombinant vaccine is approved for outbreak use in China but awaits Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the HEV vaccine.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search in Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase, employing specific terms for the recombinant HEV vaccine. Eligibility criteria involved all-age individuals receiving recombinant HEV vaccine in randomized controlled trials. Covidence software was used to screen studies, and data extraction encompassed study characteristics, baseline data, and efficacy outcomes by four reviewers. Bias evaluation was completed using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool. Statistical analysis involved use of Revman v5.4 with a random effect model, considering P < 0.05 as statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.
Results: The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in HEV vaccine efficacy compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 25.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.21, 68.75, P < 0.00001) with a substantial reduction in hepatitis E cases (OR: 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.11, P < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the HEV vaccine exhibited a significant increase in injection pain (OR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.03, 2.36, P = 0.04) and injection bruising (OR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.76, 7.48, P = 0.0005). No statistically significant differences were observed in fever (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.86, 1.23, P = 0.76) or headache (OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.72, 1.84, P = 0.56). Local events significantly increased with the vaccine (OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.38, 1.63, P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in systemic events (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.86, 1.31, P = 0.59) or serious adverse events (OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.16, 2.07, P = 0.40).
Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the significant and favorable impact of the recombinant HEV vaccine on the reduction of HEV cases. However, safety considerations are notable, as the vaccine is associated with a significant increase in injection-related pain and bruising. While localized adverse events were more frequent with the vaccine, there were no statistically significant differences in systemic events, serious adverse events, fever, or headache compared to placebo. These findings emphasize the overall effectiveness of the HEV vaccine in preventing HEV infections but highlight the need for careful monitoring and consideration of potential localized side effects.
背景:戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)是一种全球性的病毒性肝炎病因。基因型1和2在亚洲和非洲引起急性肝炎,而基因型3和4在美洲和欧洲导致散发性急性或慢性肝炎。孕妇、免疫抑制个体和慢性肝病患者面临更高的严重后果风险。HEV重组疫苗在中国被批准用于暴发疫情,但在美国等待食品和药物管理局的批准。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估HEV疫苗的安全性和有效性。方法:我们在Medline, Cochrane, Scopus和Embase中进行了系统检索,使用重组HEV疫苗的特定术语。入选标准包括在随机对照试验中接受重组HEV疫苗的所有年龄个体。使用covid软件筛选研究,数据提取包括四名评论者的研究特征、基线数据和疗效结果。偏倚评价采用Cochrane’s RoB 2工具完成。统计分析使用Revman v5.4,采用随机效应模型,考虑p2检验。结果:分析显示,与安慰剂相比,HEV疫苗的疗效(优势比[OR]: 25.16, 95%可信区间[CI] 9.21, 68.75, P P P = 0.04)和注射瘀伤(OR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.76, 7.48, P = 0.0005)具有统计学意义。发热(OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.86, 1.23, P = 0.76)和头痛(OR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.72, 1.84, P = 0.56)方面无统计学差异。接种疫苗后,局部事件显著增加(OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.38, 1.63, P = 0.59)或严重不良事件(OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.16, 2.07, P = 0.40)。结论:我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明重组HEV疫苗对减少HEV病例有显著和有利的影响。然而,安全考虑是值得注意的,因为疫苗与注射相关的疼痛和瘀伤的显著增加有关。虽然接种疫苗后局部不良事件更频繁,但与安慰剂相比,在全身事件、严重不良事件、发烧或头痛方面没有统计学上的显著差异。这些发现强调了HEV疫苗在预防HEV感染方面的总体有效性,但也强调了需要仔细监测和考虑潜在的局部副作用。