Shear-Wave Elastography Supports that Muscle Stiffness Should NOT be Considered a Criterion to Determine the Presence of Myofascial Trigger Points in the Infraspinatus Muscle.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mateusz D Kobylarz, Sebastian Klich, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero
{"title":"Shear-Wave Elastography Supports that Muscle Stiffness Should NOT be Considered a Criterion to Determine the Presence of Myofascial Trigger Points in the Infraspinatus Muscle.","authors":"Mateusz D Kobylarz, Sebastian Klich, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, Ricardo Ortega-Santiago, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Objective: This study aimed to determine latent Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and asymptomatic surrounding areas differences in pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) metrics differences. Design: Latent MTrPs and asymptomatic control points were identified within the infraspinatus muscle. A blinded examiner assessed the PPTs and acquired three SWE images of each location. PPT and SWE scores were compared by location (MTrP and control) and gender. Finally, correlations among demographics, PPTs and SWE data were calculated. Results: Forty participants were analyzed. PPTs were significantly lower in latent MTrPs compared with control points in males (p=0.003) and females (p<0.001), and lower in females compared with males (MTrP p<0.001; control point p=0.006). No significant SWE differences were found between MTrPs and control points (p>0.05) nor between males and females (MTrP and control points, p>0.05). In contrast with the accepted MTrP definition, those areas with greater PPTs exhibited greater stiffness via SWE (p<0.01). Conclusion: Although PPT scores indicated significant differences in hyperirritability between latent MTrPs and control points, SWE measurements revealed no significant differences in muscle stiffness. Furthermore, muscle stiffness was significantly associated with greater PPT scores, challenging the hypothesis that stiffer areas can be identified as MTrPs or sources of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to determine latent Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and asymptomatic surrounding areas differences in pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) metrics differences. Design: Latent MTrPs and asymptomatic control points were identified within the infraspinatus muscle. A blinded examiner assessed the PPTs and acquired three SWE images of each location. PPT and SWE scores were compared by location (MTrP and control) and gender. Finally, correlations among demographics, PPTs and SWE data were calculated. Results: Forty participants were analyzed. PPTs were significantly lower in latent MTrPs compared with control points in males (p=0.003) and females (p<0.001), and lower in females compared with males (MTrP p<0.001; control point p=0.006). No significant SWE differences were found between MTrPs and control points (p>0.05) nor between males and females (MTrP and control points, p>0.05). In contrast with the accepted MTrP definition, those areas with greater PPTs exhibited greater stiffness via SWE (p<0.01). Conclusion: Although PPT scores indicated significant differences in hyperirritability between latent MTrPs and control points, SWE measurements revealed no significant differences in muscle stiffness. Furthermore, muscle stiffness was significantly associated with greater PPT scores, challenging the hypothesis that stiffer areas can be identified as MTrPs or sources of pain.

剪切波弹性成像支持肌肉刚度不应该被认为是确定冈下肌肌筋膜触发点存在的标准。
摘要:目的:本研究旨在确定潜在肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)和无症状周围区域在疼痛压力阈值(PPTs)和剪切波弹性成像(SWE)指标上的差异。设计:在冈下肌内发现潜在的mtrp和无症状控制点。盲法审查员评估了PPTs,并获得了每个位置的三张SWE图像。PPT和SWE评分按位置(MTrP和对照组)和性别进行比较。最后,计算人口统计学、PPTs和SWE数据之间的相关性。结果:对40名参与者进行了分析。潜伏MTrPs的PPTs与男性控制点(p=0.003)和女性控制点(p= 0.05)相比显著降低,男性和女性之间(MTrP和控制点,p < 0.05)也显著降低。与公认的MTrP定义相反,通过SWE,那些具有更大PPTs的区域表现出更大的刚度(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信