Post-operative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases from lung and breast cancer in patients without prior WBRT: a retrospective dose escalation study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nicolas Roquet, Arnaud Beddok, Maxime Loo, Gilles Calais, Gilles Créhange, Ilyes Zemmoura, Catherine Horodyckid, Sophie Chapet, Thomas Frédéric-Moreau
{"title":"Post-operative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases from lung and breast cancer in patients without prior WBRT: a retrospective dose escalation study.","authors":"Nicolas Roquet, Arnaud Beddok, Maxime Loo, Gilles Calais, Gilles Créhange, Ilyes Zemmoura, Catherine Horodyckid, Sophie Chapet, Thomas Frédéric-Moreau","doi":"10.1007/s10585-025-10345-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases and how the dose-fractionation affects local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN). We retrospectively evaluated patients with brain metastases who were treated between 2010 and 2023. Post-operative HSRT was delivered in three or five fractions. The primary objective was to determine the effect of dose escalation and fractionation on LC. Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with RN. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables (significance level: p < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 19 months, 34 patients out of 212 (16%) had local recurrence. A biologically effective dose (BED<sub>10</sub>) > 28.8 Gy was associated with better LC (p = 0.002), but no benefit was found for a BED<sub>10</sub> > 48 Gy. RN developed in 34 patients (16%). A prescription BED<sub>10</sub> > 48 Gy was associated with an increased incidence of symptomatic RN (p = 0.002). For HSRT in three fractions, a CTV D99% ≥ 29 Gy significantly improved the LC (p = 0.04), and V30Gy, V23.1 Gy, and V18Gy were significantly associated with an increased risk of RN. The fractionation was not found to affect the LC or RN. This large, retrospective cohort study on post-operative HSRT indicates that a BED<sub>10</sub> of 40.9-48 Gy (3 × 7,7 Gy or 5 × 6 Gy) to the planning target volume results in excellent LC while limiting the risk of RN. No difference in LC or RN was found for different fractionations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":"42 3","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-025-10345-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases and how the dose-fractionation affects local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN). We retrospectively evaluated patients with brain metastases who were treated between 2010 and 2023. Post-operative HSRT was delivered in three or five fractions. The primary objective was to determine the effect of dose escalation and fractionation on LC. Secondary objectives included identifying factors associated with RN. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables (significance level: p < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 19 months, 34 patients out of 212 (16%) had local recurrence. A biologically effective dose (BED10) > 28.8 Gy was associated with better LC (p = 0.002), but no benefit was found for a BED10 > 48 Gy. RN developed in 34 patients (16%). A prescription BED10 > 48 Gy was associated with an increased incidence of symptomatic RN (p = 0.002). For HSRT in three fractions, a CTV D99% ≥ 29 Gy significantly improved the LC (p = 0.04), and V30Gy, V23.1 Gy, and V18Gy were significantly associated with an increased risk of RN. The fractionation was not found to affect the LC or RN. This large, retrospective cohort study on post-operative HSRT indicates that a BED10 of 40.9-48 Gy (3 × 7,7 Gy or 5 × 6 Gy) to the planning target volume results in excellent LC while limiting the risk of RN. No difference in LC or RN was found for different fractionations.

术前无WBRT的肺癌和乳腺癌脑转移患者术后低分割立体定向放疗:一项剂量递增的回顾性研究
本研究探讨了低分割立体定向放疗(HSRT)对切除脑转移瘤的治疗,以及剂量分割如何影响局部控制(LC)和放射性坏死(RN)。我们回顾性评估了2010年至2023年间接受治疗的脑转移患者。术后HSRT分三到五次进行。主要目的是确定剂量递增和分离对LC的影响。次要目标包括确定与RN相关的因素。分类数据采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,连续变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验(显著性水平:p 10), bb0 28.8 Gy与更好的LC相关(p = 0.002),但没有发现BED10 bb1 48 Gy的益处。34例(16%)患者出现RN。处方BED10 bb0 48 Gy与症状性RN发生率增加相关(p = 0.002)。对于三组HSRT, CTV D99%≥29 Gy可显著改善LC (p = 0.04), V30Gy、V23.1 Gy和V18Gy与RN风险增加显著相关。分离未发现对LC或RN有影响。这项关于术后HSRT的大型回顾性队列研究表明,与计划目标容积相比,40.9-48 Gy (3 × 7,7 Gy或5 × 6 Gy)的BED10可获得良好的LC,同时限制RN的风险。不同馏分的LC和RN无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信