Comparison of intravenous with perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy-A randomized control trial.

IF 1.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gokila Devrajan, Priyanka H Chhabra, Sushil Guria, Kapil Gupta
{"title":"Comparison of intravenous with perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy-A randomized control trial.","authors":"Gokila Devrajan, Priyanka H Chhabra, Sushil Guria, Kapil Gupta","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_134_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Dexamethasone is used as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. This study compares the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) versus perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized study was conducted on 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II adult females undergoing MRM under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups: ropivacaine perineural dexamethasone (RPD), ropivacaine IV dexamethasone (RID), and ropivacaine normal saline (RNS). Time to rescue analgesia and morphine consumption over various time points (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h) were recorded postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the RPD group (n = 20) 720 min [interquartile range (IQR: 465-1440), 95% confidence interval (CI): 638.78-1564.21)] in comparison to the RID group (n = 20) 435 min (IQR: 405-480, 95% CI: 284.8-811.1) and control (RNS) group (n = 20) 360 min (IQR: 240-415, 95% CI: 297.6-376.36) (<i>P</i> = 0.01). The median total morphine consumption in 24 h was least in the RPD group 2.0 mg (IQR: 1.0-3.0, 95% CI: 2-3) compared to the the RID 6.0 mg (IQR: 3.2-6.0, 95% CI: 6-8) and RNS groups 7.5 mg (IQR: 6.0-9.5, 95% CI: 6-8) (<i>P</i> = 0.01). The NRS scores both at rest and at physical activity were also lowest in the RPD group compared to other groups at various time points (4, 8,12, 24, and 48 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perineural dexamethasone added as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine to ESPB prolongs the duration of analgesia, reduces morphine consumption, and reduces NRS scores at rest and physical activity as compared to IV dexamethasone in patients undergoing MRM.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"357-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_134_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Dexamethasone is used as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. This study compares the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) versus perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

Material and methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized study was conducted on 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II adult females undergoing MRM under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups: ropivacaine perineural dexamethasone (RPD), ropivacaine IV dexamethasone (RID), and ropivacaine normal saline (RNS). Time to rescue analgesia and morphine consumption over various time points (4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h) were recorded postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS).

Results: The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the RPD group (n = 20) 720 min [interquartile range (IQR: 465-1440), 95% confidence interval (CI): 638.78-1564.21)] in comparison to the RID group (n = 20) 435 min (IQR: 405-480, 95% CI: 284.8-811.1) and control (RNS) group (n = 20) 360 min (IQR: 240-415, 95% CI: 297.6-376.36) (P = 0.01). The median total morphine consumption in 24 h was least in the RPD group 2.0 mg (IQR: 1.0-3.0, 95% CI: 2-3) compared to the the RID 6.0 mg (IQR: 3.2-6.0, 95% CI: 6-8) and RNS groups 7.5 mg (IQR: 6.0-9.5, 95% CI: 6-8) (P = 0.01). The NRS scores both at rest and at physical activity were also lowest in the RPD group compared to other groups at various time points (4, 8,12, 24, and 48 h).

Conclusions: Perineural dexamethasone added as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine to ESPB prolongs the duration of analgesia, reduces morphine consumption, and reduces NRS scores at rest and physical activity as compared to IV dexamethasone in patients undergoing MRM.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

静脉注射地塞米松与神经周地塞米松在超声引导下改良乳房根治术患者脊柱平面阻滞中的比较——一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:地塞米松被用作延长周围神经阻滞时间的辅助药物。本研究比较了静脉注射(IV)与神经周围地塞米松作为0.5%罗哌卡因辅助治疗改良乳房根治术(MRM)患者勃起脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)的有效性。材料与方法:本前瞻性、双盲、随机研究对60名美国麻醉学会(ASA)身体状态为I/II的成年女性在全身麻醉下行磁共振成像。患者分为罗哌卡因神经周地塞米松(RPD)组、罗哌卡因IV地塞米松(RID)组和罗哌卡因生理盐水(RNS)组。记录术后各时间点(4、8、12、24、48 h)镇痛恢复时间和吗啡用量。疼痛采用数字评定量表(NRS)进行评定。结果:RPD组首次抢救镇痛的中位时间(n = 20)为720 min[四分位数间距(IQR: 465 ~ 1440), 95%可信区间(CI): 638.78 ~ 1564.21)],显著高于RID组(n = 20) 435 min (IQR: 405 ~ 480, 95% CI: 284.8 ~ 811.1)和对照(RNS)组(n = 20) 360 min (IQR: 240 ~ 415, 95% CI: 297.6 ~ 376.36) (P = 0.01)。24 h吗啡总用量中位数RPD组为2.0 mg (IQR: 1.0 ~ 3.0, 95% CI: 2 ~ 3), RID组为6.0 mg (IQR: 3.2 ~ 6.0, 95% CI: 6 ~ 8), RNS组为7.5 mg (IQR: 6.0 ~ 9.5, 95% CI: 6 ~ 8), RPD组最低(P = 0.01)。与其他组相比,RPD组在休息和体力活动时的NRS评分在不同时间点(4、8、12、24和48小时)均最低。结论:与静脉注射地塞米松相比,将神经周地塞米松作为0.5%罗哌卡因的辅助剂添加到ESPB中可以延长镇痛持续时间,减少吗啡消耗,降低静息和体力活动时的NRS评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信