Method development for the detection of anti-drug antibodies against a therapeutic peptide: assay format selection.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bioanalysis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1080/17576180.2025.2501937
Fangfang Chen, Xiaolong He, Yan Mao, Kelly Coble
{"title":"Method development for the detection of anti-drug antibodies against a therapeutic peptide: assay format selection.","authors":"Fangfang Chen, Xiaolong He, Yan Mao, Kelly Coble","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2501937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Monitoring immune responses to therapeutic peptides with endogenous counterparts is crucial for evaluating drug safety and efficacy. In this paper, we focused on the selection of an optimal assay format to develop a sensitive, robust, and drug-tolerant immunoassay for the detection of anti-drug antibody (ADA) against a therapeutic peptide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed distinct ADA assay formats for preclinical and clinical studies, such as direct binding with labeled protein A/G, direct binding with labeled multiple species-specific antibodies for detection, bridging and affinity capture elution (ACE) formats. The assay formats were evaluated based on multiple assay parameters including sensitivity, drug tolerance, individual matrix variability and inter-assay precision. Overall, direct binding assay with labeled protein A/G for detection, which utilized less labeled peptide drug and achieved desired sensitivity and drug tolerance, is appropriate for preclinical studies. Bridging assay is more suitable format to support clinical studies as bridging assay has less assay variability than ACE assay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted advantages and limitations of each ADA assay format for peptide drugs and evaluated the performance of different assay formats in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose assay formats for preclinical and clinical phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"537-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2501937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Monitoring immune responses to therapeutic peptides with endogenous counterparts is crucial for evaluating drug safety and efficacy. In this paper, we focused on the selection of an optimal assay format to develop a sensitive, robust, and drug-tolerant immunoassay for the detection of anti-drug antibody (ADA) against a therapeutic peptide.

Results: We assessed distinct ADA assay formats for preclinical and clinical studies, such as direct binding with labeled protein A/G, direct binding with labeled multiple species-specific antibodies for detection, bridging and affinity capture elution (ACE) formats. The assay formats were evaluated based on multiple assay parameters including sensitivity, drug tolerance, individual matrix variability and inter-assay precision. Overall, direct binding assay with labeled protein A/G for detection, which utilized less labeled peptide drug and achieved desired sensitivity and drug tolerance, is appropriate for preclinical studies. Bridging assay is more suitable format to support clinical studies as bridging assay has less assay variability than ACE assay.

Conclusion: This study highlighted advantages and limitations of each ADA assay format for peptide drugs and evaluated the performance of different assay formats in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose assay formats for preclinical and clinical phases.

治疗肽抗药物抗体检测方法的发展:测定格式的选择。
目的:监测免疫应答与内源性对应物治疗肽是评估药物安全性和有效性的关键。在本文中,我们专注于选择一种最佳的分析格式,以开发一种敏感、稳健和耐药的免疫分析方法,用于检测针对治疗肽的抗药物抗体(ADA)。结果:我们评估了不同的ADA检测格式用于临床前和临床研究,例如直接结合标记蛋白A/G,直接结合标记的多物种特异性抗体进行检测,桥接和亲和捕获洗脱(ACE)格式。检测格式根据多个检测参数进行评估,包括敏感性、药物耐受性、个体基质变异性和检测间精度。总之,用标记蛋白A/G直接结合法进行检测,利用较少的标记肽药物,达到预期的灵敏度和耐药,适合临床前研究。桥接法是更适合支持临床研究的格式,因为桥接法比ACE法具有更小的分析变异性。结论:本研究突出了每一种ADA多肽药物检测格式的优势和局限性,并在检测开发过程中评估了不同检测格式的性能,以帮助临床前和临床阶段选择最适合目的的检测格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信