Prognostic impact of surgery on thymic malignancies with concurrent or previous extrathymic malignancies: a retrospective analysis from 1998 to 2021.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Guo-Sheng Li, Gui-Yu Feng, Jun Liu, Zhan-Yu Xu, Jian-Ji Guo, Tao Huang, Hua-Fu Zhou, Guan-Biao Liang, Nuo Yang
{"title":"Prognostic impact of surgery on thymic malignancies with concurrent or previous extrathymic malignancies: a retrospective analysis from 1998 to 2021.","authors":"Guo-Sheng Li, Gui-Yu Feng, Jun Liu, Zhan-Yu Xu, Jian-Ji Guo, Tao Huang, Hua-Fu Zhou, Guan-Biao Liang, Nuo Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03442-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited research on the impact of surgery on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with malignant thymoma and concurrent or previous extrathymic malignancies (PMTEMs). This retrospective analysis evaluated the prognostic value of surgery in PMTEMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were sourced from the SEER database, encompassing PMTEMs aged 20-90 with confirmed diagnoses and comprehensive clinical information. Patients were categorized into surgical (n = 105) and nonsurgical (n = 25) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate selection bias, resulting in well-balanced baseline characteristics between the groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to investigate the prognostic value of surgery in PMTEMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using PSM, the matching of characteristics between the surgical and nonsurgical groups was well-balanced, ensuring the reliability of subsequent analyses. Pre-PSM, the CSS in the surgical group was significantly better than that in the nonsurgical group (p <.001). Similarly, according to the post-PSM data, the CSS for PMTEMs in the surgical group remained superior to that in the nonsurgical group, which indicates that the survival advantage of the surgical group persisted after PSM (p =.030). Additionally, PMTEMs with smaller thymomas (≤ 5 cm) had a significant advantage in CSS compared to those with larger thymomas (p = .046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this study shows that surgery may significantly improve the survival rate of PMTEMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03442-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is limited research on the impact of surgery on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with malignant thymoma and concurrent or previous extrathymic malignancies (PMTEMs). This retrospective analysis evaluated the prognostic value of surgery in PMTEMs.

Methods: Data were sourced from the SEER database, encompassing PMTEMs aged 20-90 with confirmed diagnoses and comprehensive clinical information. Patients were categorized into surgical (n = 105) and nonsurgical (n = 25) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate selection bias, resulting in well-balanced baseline characteristics between the groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to investigate the prognostic value of surgery in PMTEMs.

Results: Using PSM, the matching of characteristics between the surgical and nonsurgical groups was well-balanced, ensuring the reliability of subsequent analyses. Pre-PSM, the CSS in the surgical group was significantly better than that in the nonsurgical group (p <.001). Similarly, according to the post-PSM data, the CSS for PMTEMs in the surgical group remained superior to that in the nonsurgical group, which indicates that the survival advantage of the surgical group persisted after PSM (p =.030). Additionally, PMTEMs with smaller thymomas (≤ 5 cm) had a significant advantage in CSS compared to those with larger thymomas (p = .046).

Conclusions: In conclusion, this study shows that surgery may significantly improve the survival rate of PMTEMs.

胸腺恶性肿瘤并发或既往胸腺外恶性肿瘤手术对预后的影响:1998年至2021年的回顾性分析
目的:关于手术对恶性胸腺瘤合并胸腺外恶性肿瘤(PMTEMs)患者癌症特异性生存(CSS)影响的研究有限。本回顾性分析评估了手术治疗pmtem的预后价值。方法:数据来源于SEER数据库,包括20-90岁确诊的PMTEMs和全面的临床信息。患者分为手术组(n = 105)和非手术组(n = 25)。倾向得分匹配(PSM)被用来减轻选择偏差,导致组之间的基线特征平衡良好。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验探讨手术对pmtem的预后价值。结果:使用PSM,手术组和非手术组之间的特征匹配良好,保证了后续分析的可靠性。psm前,手术组的CSS明显优于非手术组(p)。结论:本研究表明,手术可显著提高PMTEMs的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信