A Consensus Based Shoulder Examination for Rheumatology Training.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
H Berk Degirmenci, Robert Kalish, Ratnesh Chopra, Katarzyna Gilek-Seibert, Fotios Koumpouras, Vasileios Kyttaris, Santhanam Lakshminarayanan, Bonita Libman, Stephanie Mathew, Kenneth O'Rourke, Anthony Reginato, Eugene Kissin
{"title":"A Consensus Based Shoulder Examination for Rheumatology Training.","authors":"H Berk Degirmenci, Robert Kalish, Ratnesh Chopra, Katarzyna Gilek-Seibert, Fotios Koumpouras, Vasileios Kyttaris, Santhanam Lakshminarayanan, Bonita Libman, Stephanie Mathew, Kenneth O'Rourke, Anthony Reginato, Eugene Kissin","doi":"10.1002/acr.25556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical examination of a patient with nonspecific shoulder pain is a non-standardized teaching objective among rheumatology fellowship programs. We investigated consensus among rheumatology fellowship program directors (PD) in shoulder examination maneuvers to be performed by rheumatology fellows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Past or present rheumatology PDs currently working in New England taught a 5-minute shoulder examination to one of their trainees and recorded the resulting video of the shoulder examination. We cataloged all the performed maneuvers from these videos. Anonymized electronic surveys instructed PDs to rank each maneuver into one of the three categories: (Tier 1) Teach all fellows and should be performed routinely; (Tier 2) Teach all fellows but should be performed only in specific scenarios; (Tier 3) Teach only to selected fellows and should be performed only in specific scenarios. For maneuvers performed differently, we surveyed for consensus. Items not meeting ≥70% consensus threshold were included in the second survey and this process was repeated for a third survey. A separate survey collected PD demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 of 13 recruited PDs agreed to participate and 100% of participants completed all rounds of the study. The study addressed 65 items: 52 questions for tier designation of the examination maneuvers and 13 questions for different examination techniques. Participants achieved consensus for 40/52 tier designation items and for 8/13 technique items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study focused on shoulder examination specific to rheumatology practice and these results can provide high yield guidance for the rheumatology community. Febuxostat use is associated with a significantly greater risk of mild to moderate perturbation of liver function compared to benzbromarone in patients with gout.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical examination of a patient with nonspecific shoulder pain is a non-standardized teaching objective among rheumatology fellowship programs. We investigated consensus among rheumatology fellowship program directors (PD) in shoulder examination maneuvers to be performed by rheumatology fellows.

Methods: Past or present rheumatology PDs currently working in New England taught a 5-minute shoulder examination to one of their trainees and recorded the resulting video of the shoulder examination. We cataloged all the performed maneuvers from these videos. Anonymized electronic surveys instructed PDs to rank each maneuver into one of the three categories: (Tier 1) Teach all fellows and should be performed routinely; (Tier 2) Teach all fellows but should be performed only in specific scenarios; (Tier 3) Teach only to selected fellows and should be performed only in specific scenarios. For maneuvers performed differently, we surveyed for consensus. Items not meeting ≥70% consensus threshold were included in the second survey and this process was repeated for a third survey. A separate survey collected PD demographics.

Results: 11 of 13 recruited PDs agreed to participate and 100% of participants completed all rounds of the study. The study addressed 65 items: 52 questions for tier designation of the examination maneuvers and 13 questions for different examination techniques. Participants achieved consensus for 40/52 tier designation items and for 8/13 technique items.

Conclusion: This is the first study focused on shoulder examination specific to rheumatology practice and these results can provide high yield guidance for the rheumatology community. Febuxostat use is associated with a significantly greater risk of mild to moderate perturbation of liver function compared to benzbromarone in patients with gout.

风湿病学训练中基于共识的肩部检查。
背景:在风湿病学研究项目中,非特异性肩痛患者的体格检查是一个非标准化的教学目标。我们调查了风湿病奖学金项目主任(PD)对风湿病研究员进行肩部检查演习的共识。方法:过去或现在在新英格兰工作的风湿病学博士对他们的一名学员进行了5分钟的肩部检查,并记录了肩部检查的视频。我们把这些视频中的所有动作都编目了。匿名电子调查指示pd将每种操作分为以下三类:(第一层)教授所有同伴并应常规执行;(第2层)教授所有研究员,但只应在特定情况下进行;(第三层)只对选定的学员授课,并且只应在特定的场景中进行。对于执行不同的机动,我们进行了共识调查。不符合≥70%共识阈值的项目包括在第二次调查中,第三次调查重复此过程。另一项调查收集了PD的人口统计数据。结果:13名招募的pd中有11人同意参加,100%的参与者完成了所有轮的研究。本研究涉及65个问题:52个问题是考试技巧的等级指定,13个问题是不同的考试技巧。参与者对40/52级指定项目和8/13级技术项目达成了共识。结论:这是第一个针对风湿病实践的肩部检查的研究,这些结果可以为风湿病界提供高收益的指导。与苯溴马隆相比,非布司他与痛风患者轻度至中度肝功能紊乱的风险显著增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信