Ethical Guidelines for Direct-To-Consumer Promotion of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dan Alexandru Constantin, Ionut Horia Cioriceanu, Liliana Marcela Rogozea
{"title":"Ethical Guidelines for Direct-To-Consumer Promotion of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.","authors":"Dan Alexandru Constantin, Ionut Horia Cioriceanu, Liliana Marcela Rogozea","doi":"10.1097/MJT.0000000000001974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical providers started to consider Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for the noninvasive treatment of different psychiatric and neurology disorders as this technique become more popular in recent years. Many medical providers are trying to reach patients using direct-to-consumer (DTC) promotion of approved and off-label indications. Most of the time, these ads exaggerate benefits, create unrealistic expectations, and often exaggerate benefits. The procedure is expensive, and many insurance companies do not reimburse it; some patients may not have access to it. The study examines the ethical issues related to DTC promotion of TMS. It proposes clear ethical guidelines for transparency, equity, informed consent, data privacy, and regulation. These measures aim to encourage responsible marketing practices while ensuring the welfare of patients is protected.</p><p><strong>Areas of uncertainty: </strong>The best practice guide does not include patient autonomy and transparency in DTC advertising for TMS. Examining specialist publications, regulations, and ethical considerations ensures the structuring of ethical guidelines and the responsible promotion of DTC's medical marketing.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the PubMed, PsycINFO, BMC, and Google Scholar databases from their inception to 2025 using keywords related to TMS, regulatory compliance, DTC, marketing ethics, and patient impact. Studies that contained information regarding misinformation risks, patients' decision making, ethical guidelines in medical advertising, and DTC promotion were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of these studies identified key ethical concerns that include insufficient regulatory oversight, misleading claims that exaggerate benefits and downplay risks, privacy risks in targeted advertising, lack of standardized informed consent procedures, and limited access due to high treatment costs. Our study proposes ethical guidelines based on the ethical concerns identified that medical providers can use to ensure that patients have equitable access, transparency, and regulatory accountability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing our guidelines will ensure that patients receive unbiased information, high-quality care, and equitable access, reinforcing TMS's ethical foundation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7760,"journal":{"name":"American journal of therapeutics","volume":"32 3","pages":"e269-e273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical providers started to consider Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for the noninvasive treatment of different psychiatric and neurology disorders as this technique become more popular in recent years. Many medical providers are trying to reach patients using direct-to-consumer (DTC) promotion of approved and off-label indications. Most of the time, these ads exaggerate benefits, create unrealistic expectations, and often exaggerate benefits. The procedure is expensive, and many insurance companies do not reimburse it; some patients may not have access to it. The study examines the ethical issues related to DTC promotion of TMS. It proposes clear ethical guidelines for transparency, equity, informed consent, data privacy, and regulation. These measures aim to encourage responsible marketing practices while ensuring the welfare of patients is protected.

Areas of uncertainty: The best practice guide does not include patient autonomy and transparency in DTC advertising for TMS. Examining specialist publications, regulations, and ethical considerations ensures the structuring of ethical guidelines and the responsible promotion of DTC's medical marketing.

Data sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the PubMed, PsycINFO, BMC, and Google Scholar databases from their inception to 2025 using keywords related to TMS, regulatory compliance, DTC, marketing ethics, and patient impact. Studies that contained information regarding misinformation risks, patients' decision making, ethical guidelines in medical advertising, and DTC promotion were analyzed.

Results: The analysis of these studies identified key ethical concerns that include insufficient regulatory oversight, misleading claims that exaggerate benefits and downplay risks, privacy risks in targeted advertising, lack of standardized informed consent procedures, and limited access due to high treatment costs. Our study proposes ethical guidelines based on the ethical concerns identified that medical providers can use to ensure that patients have equitable access, transparency, and regulatory accountability.

Conclusions: Implementing our guidelines will ensure that patients receive unbiased information, high-quality care, and equitable access, reinforcing TMS's ethical foundation in clinical practice.

直接面向消费者推广经颅磁刺激的伦理指南。
背景:近年来,随着经颅磁刺激(TMS)技术的普及,医疗提供者开始考虑将其用于各种精神和神经疾病的无创治疗。许多医疗服务提供者正试图通过直接面向消费者(DTC)推广已批准和标签外适应症来接触患者。大多数时候,这些广告夸大了好处,创造了不切实际的期望,往往夸大了好处。这个过程很昂贵,许多保险公司不报销;有些病人可能无法使用它。本研究探讨了DTC促进经颅磁刺激的伦理问题。它为透明度、公平性、知情同意、数据隐私和监管提出了明确的道德准则。这些措施旨在鼓励负责任的营销做法,同时确保患者的福利得到保护。不确定领域:最佳实践指南不包括患者自主权和TMS DTC广告的透明度。审查专业出版物,法规和道德考虑确保道德准则的结构和负责任的促进DTC的医疗营销。数据来源:我们对PubMed、PsycINFO、BMC和谷歌Scholar数据库从成立到2025年进行了全面的文献综述,使用了与TMS、法规遵从性、DTC、营销伦理和患者影响相关的关键词。对包含错误信息风险、患者决策、医疗广告伦理准则和DTC推广等信息的研究进行了分析。结果:对这些研究的分析确定了关键的伦理问题,包括监管监督不足、夸大益处和低估风险的误导性声明、定向广告中的隐私风险、缺乏标准化的知情同意程序以及由于高昂的治疗费用而限制获取。我们的研究提出了基于确定的伦理问题的伦理准则,医疗提供者可以使用这些准则来确保患者有公平的获取、透明度和监管责任。结论:实施我们的指南将确保患者获得公正的信息、高质量的护理和公平的获取机会,加强经颅磁刺激在临床实践中的伦理基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of therapeutics
American journal of therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Therapeutics is an indispensable resource for all prescribing physicians who want to access pharmacological developments in cardiology, infectious disease, oncology, anesthesiology, nephrology, toxicology, and psychotropics without having to sift through stacks of medical journals. The journal features original articles on the latest therapeutic approaches as well as critical articles on the drug approval process and therapeutic reviews covering pharmacokinetics, regulatory affairs, pediatric clinical pharmacology, hypertension, metabolism, and drug delivery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信