[Medical ethical challenges of phage therapy-informed consent, study design and therapeutic trial].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hans Zillmann
{"title":"[Medical ethical challenges of phage therapy-informed consent, study design and therapeutic trial].","authors":"Hans Zillmann","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04056-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The antibiotics crisis is increasing interest in bacteriophages and related therapeutic approaches. The translation of phage therapy into clinical application faces various ethical challenges. These include the patient's informed consent based on patient information as well as open questions regarding an ethically sound study design. In addition, further ethical problems arise from the current situation of phage therapy in Germany with regard to equity of access. This article reflects on the three aspects of phage therapy mentioned above. The results show that phage therapy does not pose any requirements for patient information that could not be solved by adapting the information provided. Questions regarding an adapted study design arise against the background of the placebo dilemma, possible resistance to antibiotics and the expected small number of study participants. An attempt can be made to respond to these challenges by adapting the study design. As a result, the studies deviate from the gold standard, which is randomized, controlled and double-blind studies. A balance must be struck here between evidence requirements and the protection of study participants. From an ethical point of view, the protection of participants must be given greater weight. The current situation of phage therapy in Germany poses an ethical problem, as both the individualised therapeutic trial and the resulting medical tourism that can be observed stand in the way of the demand for fair access and distribution. In order to overcome this status, the magistral prescription represents a possible interim step until clarity has been gained about an appropriate study design.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"631-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04056-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antibiotics crisis is increasing interest in bacteriophages and related therapeutic approaches. The translation of phage therapy into clinical application faces various ethical challenges. These include the patient's informed consent based on patient information as well as open questions regarding an ethically sound study design. In addition, further ethical problems arise from the current situation of phage therapy in Germany with regard to equity of access. This article reflects on the three aspects of phage therapy mentioned above. The results show that phage therapy does not pose any requirements for patient information that could not be solved by adapting the information provided. Questions regarding an adapted study design arise against the background of the placebo dilemma, possible resistance to antibiotics and the expected small number of study participants. An attempt can be made to respond to these challenges by adapting the study design. As a result, the studies deviate from the gold standard, which is randomized, controlled and double-blind studies. A balance must be struck here between evidence requirements and the protection of study participants. From an ethical point of view, the protection of participants must be given greater weight. The current situation of phage therapy in Germany poses an ethical problem, as both the individualised therapeutic trial and the resulting medical tourism that can be observed stand in the way of the demand for fair access and distribution. In order to overcome this status, the magistral prescription represents a possible interim step until clarity has been gained about an appropriate study design.

[噬菌体治疗的医学伦理挑战——知情同意、研究设计和治疗试验]。
抗生素危机增加了人们对噬菌体和相关治疗方法的兴趣。噬菌体治疗转化为临床应用面临着各种伦理挑战。这些包括基于患者信息的患者知情同意,以及关于伦理合理的研究设计的开放性问题。此外,德国噬菌体治疗的现状在公平获取方面产生了进一步的伦理问题。本文就上述噬菌体治疗的三个方面进行了思考。结果表明,噬菌体治疗不会对患者信息提出任何要求,这些要求不能通过调整所提供的信息来解决。关于适应性研究设计的问题出现在安慰剂困境的背景下,可能的抗生素耐药性和预期的少量研究参与者。可以尝试通过调整研究设计来应对这些挑战。因此,这些研究偏离了黄金标准,即随机、对照和双盲研究。必须在证据要求和对研究参与者的保护之间取得平衡。从道德的角度来看,对参与者的保护必须给予更大的重视。德国噬菌体治疗的现状提出了一个伦理问题,因为可以观察到的个性化治疗试验和由此产生的医疗旅游都阻碍了公平获取和分配的需求。为了克服这种状况,裁判处方代表了一个可能的过渡步骤,直到明确了适当的研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信