A review on the validity of animal models for neuropsychiatric disorders: an exploration of anhedonia.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000816
Kate M Witt, David N Harper, Bart A Ellenbroek
{"title":"A review on the validity of animal models for neuropsychiatric disorders: an exploration of anhedonia.","authors":"Kate M Witt, David N Harper, Bart A Ellenbroek","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite major advances in neuroscience, there has been limited progress in improving pharmacological treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychiatric disorders are heterogeneous with variance in symptoms within disorders and partial overlap in symptoms between disorders, leading to symptoms that remain untreated. To improve treatment outcomes, neuroscience has shifted to examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying individual components, or dysfunctions, across disorders. Anhedonia, a decreased capacity to experience pleasure from positive stimuli or rewards, is a prominent symptom associated with poor functional outcome across neuropsychiatric disorders. This article reflects on Professor Paul Willner's contributions to the field of behavioural neuroscience, specifically his promotion of validity in animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Research can build upon Willner's scholarship by continuing to refine and explore the validity of animal models as our understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders improves. To exemplify this, we discuss current understanding of the neurobiological basis and clinical presentation of the two domains of anhedonia: anticipation and consumption. We argue for the examination of anticipatory anhedonia and consummatory anhedonia within a single paradigm to improve understanding of these domains, aligning animal models to the clinical reality in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":"36 4","pages":"165-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite major advances in neuroscience, there has been limited progress in improving pharmacological treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychiatric disorders are heterogeneous with variance in symptoms within disorders and partial overlap in symptoms between disorders, leading to symptoms that remain untreated. To improve treatment outcomes, neuroscience has shifted to examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying individual components, or dysfunctions, across disorders. Anhedonia, a decreased capacity to experience pleasure from positive stimuli or rewards, is a prominent symptom associated with poor functional outcome across neuropsychiatric disorders. This article reflects on Professor Paul Willner's contributions to the field of behavioural neuroscience, specifically his promotion of validity in animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Research can build upon Willner's scholarship by continuing to refine and explore the validity of animal models as our understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders improves. To exemplify this, we discuss current understanding of the neurobiological basis and clinical presentation of the two domains of anhedonia: anticipation and consumption. We argue for the examination of anticipatory anhedonia and consummatory anhedonia within a single paradigm to improve understanding of these domains, aligning animal models to the clinical reality in humans.

神经精神疾病动物模型的有效性综述:快感缺乏的探索。
尽管神经科学取得了重大进展,但在改善神经精神疾病的药物治疗方面进展有限。神经精神疾病是异质性的,疾病内部的症状有差异,疾病之间的症状有部分重叠,导致症状得不到治疗。为了改善治疗效果,神经科学已经转向研究跨障碍的个体成分或功能障碍的神经生物学机制。快感缺乏症是一种从积极刺激或奖励中体验快乐的能力下降,是神经精神疾病中与功能不良相关的一个突出症状。这篇文章反映了Paul Willner教授对行为神经科学领域的贡献,特别是他对神经精神疾病动物模型有效性的促进。随着我们对神经精神疾病的理解的提高,研究可以在Willner的学术基础上继续完善和探索动物模型的有效性。为了举例说明这一点,我们讨论了目前对快感缺乏的两个领域的神经生物学基础和临床表现的理解:预期和消耗。我们主张在单一范式内检查预期性快感缺乏症和完终性快感缺乏症,以提高对这些领域的理解,使动物模型与人类临床现实保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信