The Clinical and Refractive Outcomes of Internal Fixation Method in Intraocular Lens Dislocation.

Beyoglu Eye Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14744/bej.2025.93653
Gozde Sahin Vural, Omer Can Kayikcioglu, Eyyup Karahan
{"title":"The Clinical and Refractive Outcomes of Internal Fixation Method in Intraocular Lens Dislocation.","authors":"Gozde Sahin Vural, Omer Can Kayikcioglu, Eyyup Karahan","doi":"10.14744/bej.2025.93653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To reveal the clinical and refractive results of internal fixation surgery in patients who underwent intraocular lens (IOL) fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 40 eyes of 40 patients (FM/M:20/20) who have been operated for dislocated IOL in Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine. The demographic and clinical data were obtained from the files. The demographic data (age, sex, comorbidities, systemic treatment), the cause of IOL dislocation, primary surgery-dislocation duration, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (decimals), objective refraction, spherical equivalent (SE), intraocular pressure (IOP), the status of centration, endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications were recorded. Pre-operative parameters compared with the final visit parameters as post-operative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cause of dislocation was spontaneous in 80% of the patients, and trauma in 20%. The mean duration between cataract surgery and IOL dislocation was 33.2±39.6 months. The mean follow-up time was 19.8±8.3 months. The BCVA was improved from 0.12±0.21 to 0.73±0.33 (p=0.001), and IOP was changed from 17.6±3.2 to 17.9±2.9 mmHg (p=0.672) after surgery. The SE was decreased from 5.52±2.95 to -0.73±1.32 D (p=0.023), and the total astigmatism was decreased from 2.74±2.63 to 1.38±0.75 D (p=0.014) after surgery. ECD was increased from 1740.6±219.8 cell/mm<sup>2</sup> to 1724.5±243.0 cell/mm<sup>2</sup> (p=0.219). In the final visit, IOL was found centralized in 90% of patients through both miotic and mydriatic pupils. The post-operative complications were intravitreal hemorrhage in 2.5%, corneal edema in 7.5%, and ocular hypertension in 2.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Internal IOL fixation is a safe and reliable method in patients with dislocated IOLs, and it can be applied by fixating the dislocated IOL regardless of the haptic type. Post-operative results are acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8740,"journal":{"name":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyoglu Eye Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2025.93653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To reveal the clinical and refractive results of internal fixation surgery in patients who underwent intraocular lens (IOL) fixation.

Methods: This retrospective study included 40 eyes of 40 patients (FM/M:20/20) who have been operated for dislocated IOL in Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine. The demographic and clinical data were obtained from the files. The demographic data (age, sex, comorbidities, systemic treatment), the cause of IOL dislocation, primary surgery-dislocation duration, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (decimals), objective refraction, spherical equivalent (SE), intraocular pressure (IOP), the status of centration, endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications were recorded. Pre-operative parameters compared with the final visit parameters as post-operative results.

Results: The cause of dislocation was spontaneous in 80% of the patients, and trauma in 20%. The mean duration between cataract surgery and IOL dislocation was 33.2±39.6 months. The mean follow-up time was 19.8±8.3 months. The BCVA was improved from 0.12±0.21 to 0.73±0.33 (p=0.001), and IOP was changed from 17.6±3.2 to 17.9±2.9 mmHg (p=0.672) after surgery. The SE was decreased from 5.52±2.95 to -0.73±1.32 D (p=0.023), and the total astigmatism was decreased from 2.74±2.63 to 1.38±0.75 D (p=0.014) after surgery. ECD was increased from 1740.6±219.8 cell/mm2 to 1724.5±243.0 cell/mm2 (p=0.219). In the final visit, IOL was found centralized in 90% of patients through both miotic and mydriatic pupils. The post-operative complications were intravitreal hemorrhage in 2.5%, corneal edema in 7.5%, and ocular hypertension in 2.5%.

Conclusion: Internal IOL fixation is a safe and reliable method in patients with dislocated IOLs, and it can be applied by fixating the dislocated IOL regardless of the haptic type. Post-operative results are acceptable.

内固定治疗人工晶状体脱位的临床及屈光效果。
目的:探讨人工晶状体(IOL)内固定手术的临床及屈光效果。方法:回顾性分析Balıkesir大学医学院人工晶状体脱位手术患者40眼(FM/M:20/20)。人口统计学和临床资料从档案中获得。记录人口统计学资料(年龄、性别、合并症、全身性治疗)、IOL脱位原因、原发手术脱位持续时间、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)(小数)、物镜屈光、球等效(SE)、眼压(IOP)、集中状态、内皮细胞密度(ECD)和并发症。术前参数与终诊参数比较作为术后结果。结果:脱位的原因80%为自发性,20%为外伤。白内障手术至人工晶状体脱位的平均时间为33.2±39.6个月。平均随访时间19.8±8.3个月。术后BCVA由0.12±0.21改善至0.73±0.33 (p=0.001), IOP由17.6±3.2改善至17.9±2.9 mmHg (p=0.672)。术后SE由5.52±2.95 D降至-0.73±1.32 D (p=0.023),全散光由2.74±2.63 D降至1.38±0.75 D (p=0.014)。ECD由1740.6±219.8 cell/mm2增加到1724.5±243.0 cell/mm2 (p=0.219)。在最后一次访问中,90%的患者通过瞳孔和散瞳发现人工晶状体集中。术后并发症为玻璃体内出血2.5%,角膜水肿7.5%,高眼压2.5%。结论:对于人工晶状体脱位患者,人工晶状体内固定是一种安全可靠的治疗方法,无论触觉类型如何,均可通过固定脱位的人工晶状体进行治疗。术后结果可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信