Prognostic Evaluation of Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17298-6
Lina Yan, Lingli Zeng, Shuoyan Jiang, Ting Wang, Xuemei Jia, Fang Wang
{"title":"Prognostic Evaluation of Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.","authors":"Lina Yan, Lingli Zeng, Shuoyan Jiang, Ting Wang, Xuemei Jia, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17298-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indications of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for young women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are controversial. We aimed to evaluate the impact of FSS on the prognosis of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with EOC, whose tumors were limited to unilateral ovaries and American Joint Committee of Cancer stage 1 or 2, were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2017). Propensity score matching, restricted mean survival time, subgroup analysis, log-rank test, and two-stage test were used to evaluate the effect of FSS on cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1836 patients with stage 1 or 2 were identified and divided into FSS and non-FSS groups. After propensity score matching, 172 pairs of patients were included. Before and after propensity score matching, log-rank test and restricted mean survival time results showed FSS had no significant effect on CSS at 3, 5, and 10 years. After propensity score matching, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed FSS was not a risk factor for CSS. The study population was stratified according to variables examined by Cox regression analysis (age, race, tumor grade, stage, chemotherapy). Subgroup analysis based on log-rank and two-stage test showed FSS had no significant effect on CSS in any subgroup except the subgroup of stage 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility-sparing surgery does not lead to worse outcomes than non-FSS among stage 1 EOC patients younger than 50 years. Thus, indications of FSS for early-stage EOC patients with a strong desire for fertility preservation should be appropriately broaden.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5593-5602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17298-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indications of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for young women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are controversial. We aimed to evaluate the impact of FSS on the prognosis of patients.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with EOC, whose tumors were limited to unilateral ovaries and American Joint Committee of Cancer stage 1 or 2, were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2017). Propensity score matching, restricted mean survival time, subgroup analysis, log-rank test, and two-stage test were used to evaluate the effect of FSS on cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: A total of 1836 patients with stage 1 or 2 were identified and divided into FSS and non-FSS groups. After propensity score matching, 172 pairs of patients were included. Before and after propensity score matching, log-rank test and restricted mean survival time results showed FSS had no significant effect on CSS at 3, 5, and 10 years. After propensity score matching, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed FSS was not a risk factor for CSS. The study population was stratified according to variables examined by Cox regression analysis (age, race, tumor grade, stage, chemotherapy). Subgroup analysis based on log-rank and two-stage test showed FSS had no significant effect on CSS in any subgroup except the subgroup of stage 2.

Conclusions: Fertility-sparing surgery does not lead to worse outcomes than non-FSS among stage 1 EOC patients younger than 50 years. Thus, indications of FSS for early-stage EOC patients with a strong desire for fertility preservation should be appropriately broaden.

上皮性卵巢癌患者保留生育能力手术的预后评估:基于人群的分析。
背景:年轻女性早期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的保生育手术(FSS)适应症存在争议。我们的目的是评估FSS对患者预后的影响。方法:在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2004-2017)中确定诊断为EOC的患者,其肿瘤仅限于单侧卵巢和美国癌症联合委员会1期或2期。采用倾向评分匹配、限制平均生存时间、亚组分析、log-rank检验和两阶段检验评价FSS对癌症特异性生存(CSS)的影响。结果:共确诊1、2期患者1836例,分为FSS组和非FSS组。倾向评分匹配后,纳入172对患者。倾向评分匹配前后、log-rank检验和限制平均生存时间结果显示,FSS在3年、5年和10年对CSS没有显著影响。倾向评分匹配后,单因素和多因素Cox回归分析证实FSS不是CSS的危险因素。根据Cox回归分析检查的变量(年龄、种族、肿瘤分级、分期、化疗)对研究人群进行分层。基于log-rank和两阶段检验的亚组分析显示,FSS在除第二阶段亚组外的所有亚组中对CSS均无显著影响。结论:在年龄小于50岁的1期EOC患者中,保留生育能力的手术不会导致比非fss更差的结果。因此,对于希望保留生育能力的早期EOC患者,应适当拓宽FSS的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信