Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of Low Versus High-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17300-1
Mohamed Elsheikh, Thomas L Sutton, Ranish K Patel, Ashley Yoo, Cymon Kersch, Jason Burton, Nima Nabavizadeh, Stephanie G Wood
{"title":"Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of Low Versus High-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.","authors":"Mohamed Elsheikh, Thomas L Sutton, Ranish K Patel, Ashley Yoo, Cymon Kersch, Jason Burton, Nima Nabavizadeh, Stephanie G Wood","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17300-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dosing remains undefined. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes comparing patients treated with low-dose (LD-RT) versus high-dose (HD-RT) radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our institutional database was queried for patients with cT2-T4 or node-positive esophageal or GEJ cancer, who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2010 through 2019. LD-RT and HD-RT regimens were defined as receiving total radiation dose ≤45 Gy and ≥50 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard modeling, and logistical regression were utilized for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 287 patients were identified: 77 (27%) received LD-RT; 210 (73%) received HD-RT. Median follow-up from diagnosis to death or last contact was 37.1 months for the study cohort. Older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p = 0.02) and year of diagnosis (OR 0.77/year, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of HD-RT relative to LD-RT. Compared with HD-RT, LD-RT was associated with improved 5 year overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.03). On multivariate hazard modeling, receipt of HD-RT was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% 1.19-2.68, p = 0.005), disease-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.88, p = 0.02), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.55, p = 0.01) compared with those treated with LD-RT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite less frequent utilization than HD-RT strategies, LD-RT is associated with improved survival in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT for esophageal or GEJ cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4681-4689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17300-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dosing remains undefined. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes comparing patients treated with low-dose (LD-RT) versus high-dose (HD-RT) radiation therapy.

Methods: Our institutional database was queried for patients with cT2-T4 or node-positive esophageal or GEJ cancer, who underwent surgery with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2010 through 2019. LD-RT and HD-RT regimens were defined as receiving total radiation dose ≤45 Gy and ≥50 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard modeling, and logistical regression were utilized for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 287 patients were identified: 77 (27%) received LD-RT; 210 (73%) received HD-RT. Median follow-up from diagnosis to death or last contact was 37.1 months for the study cohort. Older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.03/year, p = 0.02) and year of diagnosis (OR 0.77/year, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of HD-RT relative to LD-RT. Compared with HD-RT, LD-RT was associated with improved 5 year overall survival (OS; 55.1 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.03). On multivariate hazard modeling, receipt of HD-RT was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% 1.19-2.68, p = 0.005), disease-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.88, p = 0.02), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.55, p = 0.01) compared with those treated with LD-RT.

Conclusions: Despite less frequent utilization than HD-RT strategies, LD-RT is associated with improved survival in those treated with neoadjuvant CRT for esophageal or GEJ cancer.

食管癌术前放化疗:低剂量与高剂量新辅助放化疗的单中心10年经验。
背景:虽然新辅助放化疗(CRT)被认为是局部晚期食管癌或胃食管交界处癌(GEJ)患者的标准治疗方法,但最佳放疗剂量仍未确定。我们的目的是比较低剂量(LD-RT)和高剂量(HD-RT)放疗患者的围手术期和长期预后。方法:查询2010年至2019年期间接受新辅助放化疗手术的cT2-T4或淋巴结阳性食管癌或GEJ癌患者的机构数据库。LD-RT和HD-RT方案分别定义为接受总辐射剂量≤45 Gy和≥50 Gy。采用Kaplan-Meier分析、Cox比例风险模型和logistic回归进行统计分析。结果:共确定287例患者:77例(27%)接受了LD-RT;210例(73%)接受了HD-RT治疗。研究队列从诊断到死亡或最后接触的中位随访时间为37.1个月。诊断时年龄较大(比值比[OR] 1.03/年,p = 0.02)和诊断年份(比值比[OR] 0.77/年,p < 0.001)与接受HD-RT相对于LD-RT独立相关。与HD-RT相比,LD-RT与改善的5年总生存期(OS;55.1 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.03)。在多变量风险建模中,与接受LD-RT治疗的患者相比,接受HD-RT治疗与更差的OS(风险比[HR] 1.79, 95% 1.19-2.68, p = 0.005)、无病生存率(HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.88, p = 0.02)和无复发生存率(HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.55, p = 0.01)独立相关。结论:尽管与HD-RT策略相比,LD-RT策略的使用频率较低,但在接受新辅助CRT治疗的食管癌或GEJ癌患者中,LD-RT与生存率提高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信