Social Needs in Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review and Future Directions.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Current Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1007/s11912-025-01664-4
Tess Thompson, Meredith Doherty, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Chelsea Brown, Emily Hallgren, Sam Kirk, Rory Weal, Krutika Chauhan, Tamara J Cadet
{"title":"Social Needs in Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review and Future Directions.","authors":"Tess Thompson, Meredith Doherty, Julie Berrett-Abebe, Chelsea Brown, Emily Hallgren, Sam Kirk, Rory Weal, Krutika Chauhan, Tamara J Cadet","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01664-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to determine what is known about the prevalence and consequences of unmet social needs in U.S. cancer survivors, what screening tools are used to assess these needs, and what interventions have been developed to meet the needs of cancer survivors.  RECENT FINDINGS: We identified records from six databases. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles in English with empirical data from U.S.-based samples of people diagnosed with cancer as adults and assessing one of the following modifiable, individual-level needs commonly included in clinical screening: food insecurity, financial hardship, utility assistance, employment, housing, transportation, or personal safety. The search yielded 11,074 abstracts; 543 records underwent full-text review, and 189 were retained for data extraction. Most studies were quantitative and observational (88%), not based on theory (88%), and cross-sectional (87%). The majority addressed financial toxicity, commonly evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Fewer studies focused on food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing concerns, personal safety, or utility assistance. Included studies reported that financial toxicity and other social needs were negatively associated with health-related quality of life, mental health, and adherence to care.  Financial toxicity is now a well-established challenge for cancer patients, which suggests financial interventions may be widely beneficial. Future work is needed to develop a fuller picture of cancer survivors' other social needs, and to understand and address the impact of unmet social needs on clinical, health, and psychosocial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"717-733"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01664-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: We conducted a scoping review to determine what is known about the prevalence and consequences of unmet social needs in U.S. cancer survivors, what screening tools are used to assess these needs, and what interventions have been developed to meet the needs of cancer survivors.  RECENT FINDINGS: We identified records from six databases. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles in English with empirical data from U.S.-based samples of people diagnosed with cancer as adults and assessing one of the following modifiable, individual-level needs commonly included in clinical screening: food insecurity, financial hardship, utility assistance, employment, housing, transportation, or personal safety. The search yielded 11,074 abstracts; 543 records underwent full-text review, and 189 were retained for data extraction. Most studies were quantitative and observational (88%), not based on theory (88%), and cross-sectional (87%). The majority addressed financial toxicity, commonly evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Fewer studies focused on food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing concerns, personal safety, or utility assistance. Included studies reported that financial toxicity and other social needs were negatively associated with health-related quality of life, mental health, and adherence to care.  Financial toxicity is now a well-established challenge for cancer patients, which suggests financial interventions may be widely beneficial. Future work is needed to develop a fuller picture of cancer survivors' other social needs, and to understand and address the impact of unmet social needs on clinical, health, and psychosocial outcomes.

癌症幸存者的社会需求:范围回顾和未来方向。
综述目的:我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定美国癌症幸存者中未满足的社会需求的患病率和后果,使用哪些筛查工具来评估这些需求,以及开发了哪些干预措施来满足癌症幸存者的需求。最近的发现:我们从六个数据库中确定了记录。纳入标准是同行评议的英文期刊文章和来自美国成年癌症患者样本的经验数据,并评估以下可修改的个人层面需求之一,这些需求通常包括在临床筛查中:食品不安全、经济困难、公用事业援助、就业、住房、交通或个人安全。搜索产生了11074篇摘要;543条记录进行了全文审查,189条记录保留用于数据提取。大多数研究是定量和观察性的(88%),而不是基于理论的(88%)和横断面的(87%)。大多数解决金融毒性问题,通常使用金融毒性综合评分(COST)进行评估。很少有研究关注食品不安全、交通障碍、住房问题、个人安全或公用事业援助。纳入的研究报告称,经济毒性和其他社会需求与健康相关的生活质量、心理健康和对护理的依从性呈负相关。金融毒性现在是癌症患者面临的一个公认的挑战,这表明金融干预可能广泛有益。未来的工作需要更全面地了解癌症幸存者的其他社会需求,并了解和解决未满足的社会需求对临床、健康和社会心理结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信