Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML Patients with Persistent Molecular MRD.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Shan Jiang, Ao Zhang, Ya-Jie Ding, Ruo-Wen Wei, Xuan Lu, Fen Chen, Wei Shi, Ling-Hui Xia
{"title":"Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML Patients with Persistent Molecular MRD.","authors":"Shan Jiang, Ao Zhang, Ya-Jie Ding, Ruo-Wen Wei, Xuan Lu, Fen Chen, Wei Shi, Ling-Hui Xia","doi":"10.1007/s11596-025-00054-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The combined use of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect molecular measurable residual disease (mMRD) has been shown to have prognostic value for patients undergoing matched-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there have been no related studies in the context of haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 148 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who were in first complete remission (CR1) and underwent HSCT at Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) between 2019 and 2023. Among them, 28 patients were mMRD (+) before transplantation according to PCR/NGS. Then, on the basis of the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification, we randomly enrolled 56 mMRD (-) patients at a 1:2 ratio. Finally, we compared the outcomes, including overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persisting mMRD predicts worse long-term clinical outcomes in AML patients who received haplo-HSCT. The 2-year OS and LFS between the mMRD (+) and mMRD (-) groups were 77.1% (95%CI 62.5-95.2) versus 92.3% (95%CI 85.3-99.9) (P = 0.044) and 72.7% (95%CI 56.9-92.8) versus 90.7% (95%CI 83.2-98.8) (P = 0.003), respectively. The results of multivariate analysis revealed that mMRD (+) patients had worse OS and LFS than control patients did and that the mMRD (+) score was an independent prognostic factor for OS and LFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-HSCT mMRD has predictive value for haplo-HSCT outcomes in AML patients. Patients who are mMRD (+) before transplantation have poorer OS and LFS. For these patients, intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC), rapid reduction in immunosuppressive agents after 30 days, and pro-donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can improve post-transplant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10820,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-025-00054-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The combined use of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect molecular measurable residual disease (mMRD) has been shown to have prognostic value for patients undergoing matched-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there have been no related studies in the context of haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT).

Methods: We included 148 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who were in first complete remission (CR1) and underwent HSCT at Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) between 2019 and 2023. Among them, 28 patients were mMRD (+) before transplantation according to PCR/NGS. Then, on the basis of the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification, we randomly enrolled 56 mMRD (-) patients at a 1:2 ratio. Finally, we compared the outcomes, including overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), between the two groups.

Results: Persisting mMRD predicts worse long-term clinical outcomes in AML patients who received haplo-HSCT. The 2-year OS and LFS between the mMRD (+) and mMRD (-) groups were 77.1% (95%CI 62.5-95.2) versus 92.3% (95%CI 85.3-99.9) (P = 0.044) and 72.7% (95%CI 56.9-92.8) versus 90.7% (95%CI 83.2-98.8) (P = 0.003), respectively. The results of multivariate analysis revealed that mMRD (+) patients had worse OS and LFS than control patients did and that the mMRD (+) score was an independent prognostic factor for OS and LFS.

Conclusion: Pre-HSCT mMRD has predictive value for haplo-HSCT outcomes in AML patients. Patients who are mMRD (+) before transplantation have poorer OS and LFS. For these patients, intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC), rapid reduction in immunosuppressive agents after 30 days, and pro-donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can improve post-transplant outcomes.

单倍体造血干细胞移植治疗持续性分子MRD患者。
目的:定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和下一代测序(NGS)联合检测分子可测量残留病(mMRD)已被证明对接受匹配造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的患者具有预后价值。然而,目前还没有关于单倍同型HSCT (haplol -HSCT)的相关研究。方法:我们纳入了2019年至2023年在中国武汉联合医院首次完全缓解(CR1)并接受HSCT的148例急性髓系白血病(AML)患者。其中28例患者在移植前经PCR/NGS检测为mMRD(+)。然后,在2017年欧洲白血病网(ELN)风险分层的基础上,我们以1:2的比例随机入组56例mMRD(-)患者。最后,我们比较了两组之间的结果,包括总生存期(OS)、累积复发发生率(CIR)、无白血病生存期(LFS)和非复发死亡率(NRM)。结果:持续mMRD预测接受单倍造血干细胞移植的AML患者的长期临床结果更差。mMRD(+)组和mMRD(-)组的2年OS和LFS分别为77.1% (95%CI 62.5 ~ 95.2) vs 92.3% (95%CI 85.3 ~ 99.9) (P = 0.044)和72.7% (95%CI 56.9 ~ 92.8) vs 90.7% (95%CI 83.2 ~ 98.8) (P = 0.003)。多因素分析结果显示,mMRD(+)患者的OS和LFS均较对照组差,mMRD(+)评分是OS和LFS的独立预后因素。结论:hsct前mMRD对AML患者单倍hsct预后具有预测价值。移植前mMRD(+)患者的OS和LFS较差。对于这些患者,强化骨髓清除调节(MAC), 30天后快速减少免疫抑制剂,以及供体前淋巴细胞输注(DLI)可以改善移植后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Science
Current Medical Science Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Current Medical Science provides a forum for peer-reviewed papers in the medical sciences, to promote academic exchange between Chinese researchers and doctors and their foreign counterparts. The journal covers the subjects of biomedicine such as physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, pathology and pathophysiology, etc., and clinical research, such as surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and otorhinolaryngology etc. The articles appearing in Current Medical Science are mainly in English, with a very small number of its papers in German, to pay tribute to its German founder. This journal is the only medical periodical in Western languages sponsored by an educational institution located in the central part of China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信