A Deep Learning Survival Model for Evaluating the Survival Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-20 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17290-0
Guibin Zheng, Peng Wei, Danxia Li, Xinna Li, Mark Zafereo, Chao Li, Wenbin Yu, Xiaohong Chen, Haitao Zheng, Xicheng Song, Guojun Li
{"title":"A Deep Learning Survival Model for Evaluating the Survival Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Guibin Zheng, Peng Wei, Danxia Li, Xinna Li, Mark Zafereo, Chao Li, Wenbin Yu, Xiaohong Chen, Haitao Zheng, Xicheng Song, Guojun Li","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17290-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning can assess the individual survival prognosis in sizeable datasets with intricate underlying processes. However, studies exploring the performance of deep learning survival in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are lacking. This study aimed to construct a deep learning model based on clinical risk factors for survival prediction in patients with PTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Cox proportional hazards deep neural network (DeepSurv) was developed and validated by using consecutive patients with PTC from 17 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) cancer registries (2000-2020). The performance of the DeepSurv model was further validated on two external test datasets from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using the survival risk scores at 10 years predicted by the DeepSurv model, we classified patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups and explored their overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concordance index of the DeepSurv model for predicting OS was 0.798 in the SEER test dataset, 0.893 in the MDACC dataset, and 0.848 in the TCGA dataset. The DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the survival risk scores at 10 years. Patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse OS than patients in the low-risk group in all three test datasets (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups, which may provide important prognostic information for personalized treatment in patients with PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4780-4789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17290-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep learning can assess the individual survival prognosis in sizeable datasets with intricate underlying processes. However, studies exploring the performance of deep learning survival in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are lacking. This study aimed to construct a deep learning model based on clinical risk factors for survival prediction in patients with PTC.

Methods: A Cox proportional hazards deep neural network (DeepSurv) was developed and validated by using consecutive patients with PTC from 17 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) cancer registries (2000-2020). The performance of the DeepSurv model was further validated on two external test datasets from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using the survival risk scores at 10 years predicted by the DeepSurv model, we classified patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups and explored their overall survival (OS).

Results: The concordance index of the DeepSurv model for predicting OS was 0.798 in the SEER test dataset, 0.893 in the MDACC dataset, and 0.848 in the TCGA dataset. The DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the survival risk scores at 10 years. Patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse OS than patients in the low-risk group in all three test datasets (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups, which may provide important prognostic information for personalized treatment in patients with PTC.

评估甲状腺乳头状癌生存预后的深度学习生存模型:一项基于人群的队列研究。
背景:深度学习可以评估具有复杂潜在过程的大规模数据集的个体生存预后。然而,关于深度学习生存在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)中的表现的研究缺乏。本研究旨在构建基于临床危险因素的PTC患者生存预测深度学习模型。方法:开发Cox比例风险深度神经网络(DeepSurv),并通过17个美国监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(SEER)癌症登记处(2000-2020)的PTC患者进行验证。DeepSurv模型的性能在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的两个外部测试数据集上得到了进一步验证。使用DeepSurv模型预测的10年生存风险评分,我们将PTC患者分为低风险组和高风险组,并探讨他们的总生存期(OS)。结果:DeepSurv模型预测OS的一致性指数在SEER测试数据集中为0.798,在MDACC数据集中为0.893,在TCGA数据集中为0.848。DeepSurv模型能够根据10年的生存风险评分将PTC患者分为低风险组和高风险组。在所有三个测试数据集中,高危组患者的OS均明显差于低危组患者(均P < 0.001)。结论:DeepSurv模型能够将PTC患者分为低危组和高危组,为PTC患者的个性化治疗提供重要的预后信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信